Literature DB >> 24828219

Patterns of hearing aid usage predict hearing aid use amount (data logged and self-reported) and overreport.

Ariane Laplante-Lévesque1, Claus Nielsen2, Lisbeth Dons Jensen2, Graham Naylor2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies found that, on average, users overreport their daily amount of hearing aid use compared to objective measures such as data logging. However, the reasons for this are unclear.
PURPOSE: This study assessed data-logged and self-reported amount of hearing aid use in a clinical sample of hearing aid users. It identified predictors of data-logged hearing aid use, self-reported hearing aid use, and hearing aid use overreport. RESEARCH
DESIGN: This observational study recruited adult hearing aid users from 22 private dispensers in the Netherlands and in Denmark. STUDY SAMPLE: The sample consisted of 228 hearing aid users. Typical participants were over the age of 65 and retired, were fitted binaurally, and had financially contributed to the cost of their hearing aids. Participants had on average a mild-to-severe sloping bilateral hearing impairment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Participants completed a purposefully designed questionnaire regarding hearing aid usage and the International Outcome Inventory-Hearing Aids. Dispensers collected audiometric results and data logging. Multiple linear regression identified predictors of data-logged hearing aid use, self-reported hearing aid use, and hearing aid use overreport when controlling for covariates.
RESULTS: Data logging showed on average 10.5 hr of hearing aid use (n = 184), while participants reported on average 11.8 hr of daily hearing aid use (n = 206). In participants for which both data-logged and self-reported hearing aid use data were available (n = 166), the average absolute overreport of daily hearing aid use was 1.2 (1 hr and 11 min). Relative overreport was expressed as a rate of absolute overreport divided by data-logged hearing aid use. A positive rate denotes hearing aid use overreport: the average overreport rate was .38. Cluster analysis identified two data-logged patterns: "Regular," where hearing aids are typically switched on for between 12 and 20 hr before their user powers them off (57% of the sample), and "On-off," where hearing aids are typically switched on for shorter periods of time before being powered off (43% of the sample). In terms of self-report, 77% of the sample described their hearing aid use to be the same every day, while 23% of the sample described their hearing aid use to be different from day to day. Participants for whom data logging showed an On-off pattern or who reported their hearing aid use to be different from day to day had significantly fewer data-logged and self-reported hours of hearing aid use. Having an On-off data-logging pattern or describing hearing aid use as the same every day was associated with a significantly greater hearing aid use overreport.
CONCLUSIONS: Data-logged and self-reported usage patterns significantly predicted data-logged hearing aid use, self-reported hearing aid use, and overreport when controlling for covariates. The results point to patterns of hearing aid usage as being at least as important a concept as amount of hearing aid use. Dispensers should discuss not only the "how much", but also the "how" of hearing aid usage with their clients. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24828219     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.25.2.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  14 in total

Review 1.  Developing Foundational Counseling Skills for Addressing Adherence Issues in Auditory Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Carole E Johnson; Anna Marie Jilla; Jeffrey L Danhauer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-02-07

Review 2.  Bilateral versus unilateral hearing aids for bilateral hearing impairment in adults.

Authors:  Anne Gm Schilder; Lee Yee Chong; Saoussen Ftouh; Martin J Burton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-12-19

3.  The Effect of the Use of Hearing Aids in Elders: Perspectives.

Authors:  Daniele Monzani; Riccardo Nocini; Maria Teresa Presutti; Chiara Gherpelli; Federica Di Berardino; Silvia Ferrari; Gian Maria Galeazzi; Gaia Federici; Elisabetta Genovese; Silvia Palma
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2022-03-05

4.  The Cochlear Implant Use Questionnaire: Assessing Habits and Barriers to Use.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Lindsay S Mayberry; René Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Associations of Hearing Loss Severity and Hearing Aid Use With Hospitalization Among Older US Adults.

Authors:  Anthony Thai; Suleman I Khan; Jeff Choi; Yifei Ma; Uchechukwu C Megwalu
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 8.961

6.  Speech audiometry and data logging in CI patients : Implications for adequate test levels.

Authors:  M Hey; T Hocke; P Ambrosch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  [Speech audiometry and data logging in CI patients : Implications for adequate test levels. German version].

Authors:  M Hey; T Hocke; P Ambrosch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Effectiveness of an online SUpport PRogramme (SUPR) for older hearing aid users: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Janine Fj Meijerink; Marieke Pronk; Bernadette Paulissen; Birgit I Witte; Bregje van der Wouden; Vera Jansen; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Clinical validation of a public health policy-making platform for hearing loss (EVOTION): protocol for a big data study.

Authors:  Giorgos Dritsakis; Dimitris Kikidis; Nina Koloutsou; Louisa Murdin; Athanasios Bibas; Katherine Ploumidou; Ariane Laplante-Lévesque; Niels Henrik Pontoppidan; Doris-Eva Bamiou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Application of Data Mining to a Large Hearing-Aid Manufacturer's Dataset to Identify Possible Benefits for Clinicians, Manufacturers, and Users.

Authors:  Joseph Mellor; Michael A Stone; John Keane
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.