Literature DB >> 24827935

Use of and confidence in administering outcome measures among clinical prosthetists: Results from a national survey and mixed-methods training program.

Ignacio Gaunaurd1, Susan E Spaulding2, Dagmar Amtmann2, Rana Salem2, Robert Gailey1, Sara J Morgan2, Brian J Hafner3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcome measures can be used in prosthetic practices to evaluate interventions, inform decision making, monitor progress, document outcomes, and justify services. Strategies to enhance prosthetists' ability to use outcome measures are needed to facilitate their adoption in routine practice.
OBJECTIVE: To assess prosthetists' use of outcome measures and evaluate the effects of training on their confidence in administering performance-based measures. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional and single-group pretest-posttest survey.
METHODS: Seventy-nine certified prosthetists (mean of 16.0 years of clinical experience) were surveyed about their experiences with 20 standardized outcome measures. Prosthetists were formally trained by the investigators to administer the Timed Up and Go and Amputee Mobility Predictor. Prosthetists' confidence in administering the Timed Up and Go and Amputee Mobility Predictor was measured before and after training.
RESULTS: The majority of prosthetists (62%) were classified as non-routine outcome measure users. Confidence administering the Timed Up and Go and Amputee Mobility Predictor prior to training was low-to-moderate across the study sample. Training significantly (p < 0.0001) improved prosthetists' confidence in administering both instruments.
CONCLUSION: Prosthetists in this study reported limited use of and confidence with standardized outcome measures. Interactive training resulted in a statistically significant increase of prosthetists' confidence in administering the Timed Up and Go and Amputee Mobility Predictor and may facilitate use of outcome measures in clinical practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Frequency of outcome measure use in the care of persons with limb loss has not been studied. Study results suggest that prosthetists may not regularly use standardized outcome measures and report limited confidence in administering them. Training enhances confidence and may encourage use of outcome measures in clinical practice. © The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Standardized outcome measures; confidence; prosthetist; training

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24827935      PMCID: PMC4232484          DOI: 10.1177/0309364614532865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int        ISSN: 0309-3646            Impact factor:   1.895


  16 in total

1.  Outcome measures in neurological physical therapy practice: part I. Making sound decisions.

Authors:  Kirsten Potter; George D Fulk; Yasser Salem; Jane Sullivan
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 2.  Measuring quality of life in prosthetic practice: benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Pamela Gallagher; Deirdre Desmond
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale.

Authors:  L E Powell; A M Myers
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Reliability of outcome measures for people with lower-limb amputations: distinguishing true change from statistical error.

Authors:  Linda Resnik; Matthew Borgia
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-02-10

5.  The Timed "up and go" test: reliability and validity in persons with unilateral lower limb amputation.

Authors:  T Schoppen; A Boonstra; J W Groothoff; J de Vries; L N Göeken; W H Eisma
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications.

Authors:  Diane U Jette; James Halbert; Courtney Iverson; Erin Miceli; Palak Shah
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-12-12

7.  Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life.

Authors:  M W Legro; G D Reiber; D G Smith; M del Aguila; J Larsen; D Boone
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 8.  Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Louise Forsetlund; Arild Bjørndal; Arash Rashidian; Gro Jamtvedt; Mary Ann O'Brien; Fredric Wolf; Dave Davis; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

9.  Six-minute walk test in persons with transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Suh-Jen Lin; Nisha Hathi Bose
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Developing Core Sets for persons following amputation based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a way to specify functioning.

Authors:  Friedbert Kohler; Alarcos Cieza; Gerold Stucki; Jan Geertzen; Helena Burger; Michael P Dillon; Carolina Schiappacasse; Alberto Esquenazi; Robert Steven Kistenberg; Nenad Kostanjsek
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  17 in total

1.  Prosthetists' perceptions and use of outcome measures in clinical practice: Long-term effects of focused continuing education.

Authors:  Brian J Hafner; Susan E Spaulding; Rana Salem; Sara J Morgan; Ignacio Gaunaurd; Robert Gailey
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Psychometric evaluation of self-report outcome measures for prosthetic applications.

Authors:  Brian J Hafner; Sara J Morgan; Robert L Askew; Rana Salem
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2016

3.  Characterizing mobility from the prosthetic limb user's perspective: Use of focus groups to guide development of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility.

Authors:  Brian J Hafner; Sara J Morgan; Daniel C Abrahamson; Dagmar Amtmann
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Construct Validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) in Adults With Lower Limb Amputation.

Authors:  Brian J Hafner; Ignacio A Gaunaurd; Sara J Morgan; Dagmar Amtmann; Rana Salem; Robert S Gailey
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Intuitive Clinician Control Interface for a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis: A Case Study.

Authors:  David Quintero; Emma Reznick; Daniel J Lambert; Siavash Rezazadeh; Leslie Gray; Robert D Gregg
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 3.316

6.  Using Clinical Balance Tests to Assess Fall Risk among Established Unilateral Lower Limb Prosthesis Users: Cutoff Scores and Associated Validity Indices.

Authors:  Andrew Sawers; Brian J Hafner
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  Test-Retest Reliability of Dynamic Balance Performance-Based Measures Among Adults With a Unilateral Lower-Limb Amputation.

Authors:  Jefferson R Cardoso; Emma H Beisheim; John R Horne; J Megan Sions
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Association of self-reported cognitive concerns with mobility in people with lower limb loss.

Authors:  Valerie E Kelly; Sara J Morgan; Dagmar Amtmann; Rana Salem; Brian J Hafner
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  Elastomeric liners for people with transtibial amputation: Survey of prosthetists' clinical practices.

Authors:  Brian J Hafner; John C Cagle; Katheryn J Allyn; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Differences in Physical Performance Measures Among Patients With Unilateral Lower-Limb Amputations Classified as Functional Level K3 Versus K4.

Authors:  Jaclyn Megan Sions; Emma Haldane Beisheim; Tara Jo Manal; Sarah Carolyn Smith; John Robert Horne; Frank Bernard Sarlo
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.