Literature DB >> 24827448

Predictors of contraction and expansion of area of occupancy for British birds.

Corey J A Bradshaw1, Barry W Brook2, Steven Delean2, Damien A Fordham2, Salvador Herrando-Pérez3, Phillip Cassey2, Regan Early4, Cagan H Sekercioglu5, Miguel B Araújo6.   

Abstract

Geographical range dynamics are driven by the joint effects of abiotic factors, human ecosystem modifications, biotic interactions and the intrinsic organismal responses to these. However, the relative contribution of each component remains largely unknown. Here, we compare the contribution of life-history attributes, broad-scale gradients in climate and geographical context of species' historical ranges, as predictors of recent changes in area of occupancy for 116 terrestrial British breeding birds (74 contractors, 42 expanders) between the early 1970s and late 1990 s. Regional threat classifications demonstrated that the species of highest conservation concern showed both the largest contractions and the smallest expansions. Species responded differently to climate depending on geographical distribution-northern species changed their area of occupancy (expansion or contraction) more in warmer and drier regions, whereas southern species changed more in colder and wetter environments. Species with slow life history (larger body size) tended to have a lower probability of changing their area of occupancy than species with faster life history, whereas species with greater natal dispersal capacity resisted contraction and, counterintuitively, expansion. Higher geographical fragmentation of species' range also increased expansion probability, possibly indicating a release from a previously limiting condition, for example through agricultural abandonment since the 1970s. After accounting statistically for the complexity and nonlinearity of the data, our results demonstrate two key aspects of changing area of occupancy for British birds: (i) climate is the dominant driver of change, but direction of effect depends on geographical context, and (ii) all of our predictors generally had a similar effect regardless of the direction of the change (contraction versus expansion). Although we caution applying results from Britain's highly modified and well-studied bird community to other biogeographic regions, our results do indicate that a species' propensity to change area of occupancy over decadal scales can be explained partially by a combination of simple allometric predictors of life-history pace, average climate conditions and geographical context.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biogeography; body size; climate; demography; dispersal; threatened species

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24827448      PMCID: PMC4046421          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  28 in total

1.  Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change.

Authors:  M S Warren; J K Hill; J A Thomas; J Asher; R Fox; B Huntley; D B Roy; M G Telfer; S Jeffcoate; P Harding; G Jeffcoate; S G Willis; J N Greatorex-Davies; D Moss; C D Thomas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Dynamics of extinction and the selection of nature reserves.

Authors:  Miguel B Araújo; Paul H Williams; Robert J Fuller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Ecosystem consequences of bird declines.

Authors:  Cağan H Sekercioğlu; Gretchen C Daily; Paul R Ehrlich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Climate change and distribution shifts in marine fishes.

Authors:  Allison L Perry; Paula J Low; Jim R Ellis; John D Reynolds
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Multiple Allee effects and population management.

Authors:  Ludek Berec; Elena Angulo; Franck Courchamp
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Coupling of dispersal and aggression facilitates the rapid range expansion of a passerine bird.

Authors:  Renée A Duckworth; Alexander V Badyaev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Phylogenetic distributions of British birds of conservation concern.

Authors:  Gavin H Thomas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The predictability of extinction: biological and external correlates of decline in mammals.

Authors:  Marcel Cardillo; Georgina M Mace; John L Gittleman; Kate E Jones; Jon Bielby; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Dynamics of range margins for metapopulations under climate change.

Authors:  B J Anderson; H R Akçakaya; M B Araújo; D A Fordham; E Martinez-Meyer; W Thuiller; B W Brook
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change.

Authors:  W A Kurz; C C Dymond; G Stinson; G J Rampley; E T Neilson; A L Carroll; T Ebata; L Safranyik
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  6 in total

1.  Velocity of density shifts in Finnish landbird species depends on their migration ecology and body mass.

Authors:  Kaisa Välimäki; Andreas Lindén; Aleksi Lehikoinen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Traits influencing range contraction in New Zealand's endemic forest birds.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Parlato; Doug P Armstrong; John G Innes
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Ocean currents modify the coupling between climate change and biogeographical shifts.

Authors:  J García Molinos; M T Burrows; E S Poloczanska
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Associations of breeding-bird abundance with climate vary among species and trait-based groups in southern California.

Authors:  Frank A Fogarty; Daniel R Cayan; Laurel L DeHaan; Erica Fleishman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Improvements in reports of species redistribution under climate change are required.

Authors:  Shirin Taheri; Babak Naimi; Carsten Rahbek; Miguel B Araújo
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Crop diversity loss as primary cause of grey partridge and common pheasant decline in Lower Saxony, Germany.

Authors:  Katrin Ronnenberg; Egbert Strauß; Ursula Siebert
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.964

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.