Literature DB >> 12396495

Dynamics of extinction and the selection of nature reserves.

Miguel B Araújo1, Paul H Williams, Robert J Fuller.   

Abstract

Familiar quantitative reserve-selection techniques are tailored to simple decision problems, where the representation of species is sought at minimum cost. However, conservationists have begun to ask whether representing species in reserve networks is sufficient to avoid local extinctions within selected areas. An attractive, but previously untested idea is to model current species' probabilities of occurrence as an estimate of local persistence in the near future. Using distribution data for passerine birds in Great Britain, we show that (i) species' probabilities of occurrence are negatively related to local probabilities of extinction, at least when a particular 20-year period is considered, and (ii) local extinctions can be reduced if areas are selected to maximize current species' probabilities of occurrence We suggest that more extinctions could be avoided if even a simple treatment of persistence were to be incorporated within reserve selection methods.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12396495      PMCID: PMC1691129          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  10 in total

1.  Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity.

Authors:  M Cabeza; A Moilanen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 2.  Systematic conservation planning.

Authors:  C R Margules; R L Pressey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Robustness of reserve selection procedures under temporal species turnover.

Authors:  A S Rodrigues; R D Gregory; K J Gaston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species.

Authors:  R Channell; M V Lomolino
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Using probability of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  P H Williams; M B Araújo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins.

Authors:  C D Thomas; E J Bodsworth; R J Wilson; A D Simmons; Z G Davies; M Musche; L Conradt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-31       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios.

Authors:  A Townsend Peterson; Miguel A Ortega-Huerta; Jeremy Bartley; Victor Sánchez-Cordero; Jorge Soberón; Robert H Buddemeier; David R B Stockwell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  ECOLOGY: Conservation Targets: Do They Help?

Authors:  M E Soulé; M A Sanjayan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Metapopulation dynamics, abundance, and distribution in a microecosystem

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming.

Authors:  A J Davis; L S Jenkinson; J H Lawton; B Shorrocks; S Wood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Environmental stochasticity in dispersal areas can explain the "mysterious" disappearance of breeding populations.

Authors:  Vincenzo Penteriani; Fermín Otalora; Fabrizio Sergio; Miguel Ferrer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Predictors of contraction and expansion of area of occupancy for British birds.

Authors:  Corey J A Bradshaw; Barry W Brook; Steven Delean; Damien A Fordham; Salvador Herrando-Pérez; Phillip Cassey; Regan Early; Cagan H Sekercioglu; Miguel B Araújo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Avoiding costly conservation mistakes: the importance of defining actions and costs in spatial priority setting.

Authors:  Josie Carwardine; Kerrie A Wilson; Matt Watts; Andres Etter; Carissa J Klein; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Matching species traits to projected threats and opportunities from climate change.

Authors:  Raquel A Garcia; Miguel B Araújo; Neil D Burgess; Wendy B Foden; Alexander Gutsche; Carsten Rahbek; Mar Cabeza
Journal:  J Biogeogr       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.324

5.  Less favourable climates constrain demographic strategies in plants.

Authors:  Anna M Csergő; Roberto Salguero-Gómez; Olivier Broennimann; Shaun R Coutts; Antoine Guisan; Amy L Angert; Erik Welk; Iain Stott; Brian J Enquist; Brian McGill; Jens-Christian Svenning; Cyrille Violle; Yvonne M Buckley
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Protected areas network is not adequate to protect a critically endangered East Africa Chelonian: Modelling distribution of pancake tortoise, Malacochersus tornieri under current and future climates.

Authors:  Abraham Eustace; Luíz Fernando Esser; Rudolf Mremi; Patrick K Malonza; Reginald T Mwaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Species distribution models of European Turtle Doves in Germany are more reliable with presence only rather than presence absence data.

Authors:  Melanie Marx; Petra Quillfeldt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.