Literature DB >> 24826901

Positive selection drives faster-Z evolution in silkmoths.

Timothy B Sackton1, Russell B Corbett-Detig, Javaregowda Nagaraju, Lakshmi Vaishna, Kallare P Arunkumar, Daniel L Hartl.   

Abstract

Genes linked to X or Z chromosomes, which are hemizygous in the heterogametic sex, are predicted to evolve at different rates than those on autosomes. This "faster-X effect" can arise either as a consequence of hemizygosity, which leads to more efficient selection for recessive beneficial mutations in the heterogametic sex, or as a consequence of reduced effective population size of the hemizygous chromosome, which leads to increased fixation of weakly deleterious mutations due to genetic drift. Empirical results to date suggest that, while the overall pattern across taxa is complicated, systems with male heterogamy show a faster-X effect attributable to more efficient selection, whereas the faster-Z effect in female-heterogametic taxa is attributable to increased drift. To test the generality of the faster-Z pattern seen in birds and snakes, we sequenced the genome of the lepidopteran silkmoth Bombyx huttoni. We show that silkmoths experience faster-Z evolution, but unlike in birds and snakes, the faster-Z effect appears to be attributable to more efficient positive selection. These results suggest that female heterogamy alone is unlikely to explain the reduced efficacy of selection on vertebrate Z chromosomes. It is likely that many factors, including differences in overall effective population size, influence Z chromosome evolution.
© 2014 The Author(s). Evolution © 2014 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bombyx mori; sex chromosome evolution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24826901      PMCID: PMC4122604          DOI: 10.1111/evo.12449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  63 in total

1.  Impact of genetic architecture on the relative rates of X versus autosomal adaptive substitution.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Nadia D Singh; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Enhanced adaptive evolution of sperm-expressed genes on the mammalian X chromosome.

Authors:  D G Torgerson; R S Singh
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Effective population size and the Faster-X effect: empirical results and their interpretation.

Authors:  Judith E Mank; Beatriz Vicoso; Sofia Berlin; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Paucity of genes on the Drosophila X chromosome showing male-biased expression.

Authors:  Michael Parisi; Rachel Nuttall; Daniel Naiman; Gerard Bouffard; James Malley; Justen Andrews; Scott Eastman; Brian Oliver
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Are all sex chromosomes created equal?

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog; Mark Kirkpatrick; Judith E Mank; Stuart F McDaniel; J Chris Pires; William Rice; Nicole Valenzuela
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Comparative sex chromosome genomics in snakes: differentiation, evolutionary strata, and lack of global dosage compensation.

Authors:  Beatriz Vicoso; J J Emerson; Yulia Zektser; Shivani Mahajan; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Large scale full-length cDNA sequencing reveals a unique genomic landscape in a lepidopteran model insect, Bombyx mori.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Suetsugu; Ryo Futahashi; Hiroyuki Kanamori; Keiko Kadono-Okuda; Shun-ichi Sasanuma; Junko Narukawa; Masahiro Ajimura; Akiya Jouraku; Nobukazu Namiki; Michihiko Shimomura; Hideki Sezutsu; Mizuko Osanai-Futahashi; Masataka G Suzuki; Takaaki Daimon; Tetsuro Shinoda; Kiyoko Taniai; Kiyoshi Asaoka; Ryusuke Niwa; Shinpei Kawaoka; Susumu Katsuma; Toshiki Tamura; Hiroaki Noda; Masahiro Kasahara; Sumio Sugano; Yutaka Suzuki; Haruhiko Fujiwara; Hiroshi Kataoka; Kallare P Arunkumar; Archana Tomar; Javaregowda Nagaraju; Marian R Goldsmith; Qili Feng; Qingyou Xia; Kimiko Yamamoto; Toru Shimada; Kazuei Mita
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler.

Authors:  Ruibang Luo; Binghang Liu; Yinlong Xie; Zhenyu Li; Weihua Huang; Jianying Yuan; Guangzhu He; Yanxiang Chen; Qi Pan; Yunjie Liu; Jingbo Tang; Gengxiong Wu; Hao Zhang; Yujian Shi; Yong Liu; Chang Yu; Bo Wang; Yao Lu; Changlei Han; David W Cheung; Siu-Ming Yiu; Shaoliang Peng; Zhu Xiaoqian; Guangming Liu; Xiangke Liao; Yingrui Li; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Tak-Wah Lam; Jun Wang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 6.524

9.  Fast statistical alignment.

Authors:  Robert K Bradley; Adam Roberts; Michael Smoot; Sudeep Juvekar; Jaeyoung Do; Colin Dewey; Ian Holmes; Lior Pachter
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  REAPR: a universal tool for genome assembly evaluation.

Authors:  Martin Hunt; Taisei Kikuchi; Mandy Sanders; Chris Newbold; Matthew Berriman; Thomas D Otto
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  31 in total

1.  High nucleotide diversity and limited linkage disequilibrium in Helicoverpa armigera facilitates the detection of a selective sweep.

Authors:  S V Song; S Downes; T Parker; J G Oakeshott; C Robin
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Molecular Mechanisms and Evolutionary Processes Contributing to Accelerated Divergence of Gene Expression on the Drosophila X Chromosome.

Authors:  Joseph D Coolon; Kraig R Stevenson; C Joel McManus; Bing Yang; Brenton R Graveley; Patricia J Wittkopp
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  The Relative Contributions of the X Chromosome and Autosomes to Local Adaptation.

Authors:  Clémentine Lasne; Carla M Sgrò; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  The faster-X effect: integrating theory and data.

Authors:  Richard P Meisel; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Z chromosome divergence, polymorphism and relative effective population size in a genus of lekking birds.

Authors:  S J Oyler-McCance; R S Cornman; K L Jones; J A Fike
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Support for faster and more adaptive Z chromosome evolution in two divergent lepidopteran lineages.

Authors:  Andrew J Mongue; Megan E Hansen; James R Walters
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Sex linkage of the skeletal muscle sodium channel gene (SCN4A) explains apparent deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium of tetrodotoxin-resistance alleles in garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis).

Authors:  Kerry L Gendreau; Michael T J Hague; Chris R Feldman; Edmund D Brodie; Edmund D Brodie; Joel W McGlothlin
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Contrasting Levels of Molecular Evolution on the Mouse X Chromosome.

Authors:  Erica L Larson; Dan Vanderpool; Sara Keeble; Meng Zhou; Brice A J Sarver; Andrew D Smith; Matthew D Dean; Jeffrey M Good
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Positive Selection Underlies Faster-Z Evolution of Gene Expression in Birds.

Authors:  Rebecca Dean; Peter W Harrison; Alison E Wright; Fabian Zimmer; Judith E Mank
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Postcopulatory sexual selection reduces Z-linked genetic variation and might contribute to the large Z effect in passerine birds.

Authors:  Václav Janoušek; Jitka Fischerová; Libor Mořkovský; Jiří Reif; Marcin Antczak; Tomáš Albrecht; Radka Reifová
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.