Literature DB >> 24825304

The effect of Twitter exposure on false memory formation.

Kimberly M Fenn1, Nicholas R Griffin, Mitchell G Uitvlugt, Susan M Ravizza.   

Abstract

Social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter have increased drastically in popularity. However, information on these sites is not verified and may contain inaccuracies. It is well-established that false information encountered after an event can lead to memory distortion. Therefore, social media may be particularly harmful for autobiographical memory. Here, we tested the effect of Twitter on false memory. We presented participants with a series of images that depicted a story and then presented false information about the images in a scrolling feed that bore either a low or high resemblance to a Twitter feed. Confidence for correct information was similar across the groups, but confidence for suggested information was significantly lower when false information was presented in a Twitter format. We propose that individuals take into account the medium of the message when integrating information into memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24825304     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0639-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  8 in total

1.  Individual differences in false memory from misinformation: cognitive factors.

Authors:  Bi Zhu; Chuansheng Chen; Elizabeth F Loftus; Chongde Lin; Qinghua He; Chunhui Chen; He Li; Gui Xue; Zhonglin Lu; Qi Dong
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2010-07

2.  Individual differences in susceptibility to false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.

Authors:  Jason M Watson; Michael F Bunting; Bradley J Poole; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  An automated version of the operation span task.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Richard P Heitz; Josef C Schrock; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

4.  Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips.

Authors:  Betsy Sparrow; Jenny Liu; Daniel M Wegner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Neural activity during encoding predicts false memories created by misinformation.

Authors:  Yoko Okado; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics.

Authors:  Gerald Echterhoff; William Hirst; Walter Hussy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-07

Review 7.  Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Loftus
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Major memory for microblogs.

Authors:  Laura Mickes; Ryan S Darby; Vivian Hwe; Daniel Bajic; Jill A Warker; Christine R Harris; Nicholas J S Christenfeld
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-05
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Potential for False Memories is Bigger than What Brewin and Andrews Suggest.

Authors:  Henry Otgaar; Harald Merckelbach; Marko Jelicic; Tom Smeets
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-10-14

2.  Reading the news on Twitter: Source and item memory for social media in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Kimberly A Bourne; Sarah C Boland; Grace C Arnold; Jennifer H Coane
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-03-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.