Literature DB >> 24825250

Hemolysis-free blood plasma separation.

Jun Ho Son1, Sang Hun Lee, Soongweon Hong, Seung-min Park, Joseph Lee, Andrea M Dickey, Luke P Lee.   

Abstract

Hemolysis, involving the rupture of red blood cells (RBCs) and release of their contents into blood plasma, is a major issue of concern in clinical fields. Hemolysis in vitro can occur as a result of errors in clinical trials; in vivo, hemolysis can be caused by a variety of medical conditions. Blood plasma separation is often the first step in blood-based clinical diagnostic procedures. However, inhibitors released from RBCs due to hemolysis during plasma separation can lead to problems in diagnostic tests such as low sensitivity, selectivity and inaccurate results. In particular, a general lack of simple and reliable blood plasma separation methods has been a major obstacle for microfluidic-based point-of-care (POC) diagnostic devices. Here we present a hemolysis-free microfluidic blood plasma separation platform. A membrane filter was positioned on top of a vertical up-flow channel (filter-in-top configuration) to reduce clogging of RBCs by gravity-assisted cells sedimentation. With this device, separated plasma volume was increased approximately 4-fold (2.4 μL plasma after 20 min with 38% hematocrit human whole blood), and hemoglobin concentration in separated plasma was decreased approximately 90% due to the prevention of RBCs hemolysis, when compared to conventional filter-in-bottom configuration blood plasma separation platforms. On-chip plasma contained ~90% of protein and ~100% of nucleic acids found in off-chip centrifuged plasma, confirming comparable target molecule recovery efficiency. This simple and robust on-chip blood plasma separation device integrates with downstream detection modules to ultimately create sample-to-answer microfluidic POC diagnostics devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24825250     DOI: 10.1039/c4lc00149d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  13 in total

1.  Phaseguide-assisted blood separation microfluidic device for point-of-care applications.

Authors:  Linfeng Xu; Hun Lee; Mariana Vanderlei Brasil Pinheiro; Phil Schneider; Deekshitha Jetta; Kwang W Oh
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Wicking microfluidic approach to separate blood plasma from whole blood to facilitate downstream assays.

Authors:  Gayan C Bandara; Linus J Unitan; Matthew H Kremer; Owen T Shellhammer; Shay Bracha; Vincent T Remcho
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  Capillary flow of blood in a microchannel with differential wetting for blood plasma separation and on-chip glucose detection.

Authors:  M Sneha Maria; P E Rakesh; T S Chandra; A K Sen
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  A low cost, membranes based serum separator modular.

Authors:  Xiaosong Su; Shiyin Zhang; Shengxiang Ge; Mengyuan Chen; Jianzhong Zhang; Jun Zhang; Ningshao Xia
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Screening of multiple hemoprotein-specific aptamers and their applications for the binding, quantification, and extraction of hemoproteins in a microfluidic system.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Wang; Gwo-Bin Lee
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 2.800

6.  A high-efficiency superhydrophobic plasma separator.

Authors:  Changchun Liu; Shih-Chuan Liao; Jinzhao Song; Michael G Mauk; Xuanwen Li; Gaoxiang Wu; Dengteng Ge; Robert M Greenberg; Shu Yang; Haim H Bau
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 6.799

7.  Molecular diffusion analysis of dynamic blood flow and plasma separation driven by self-powered microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Sung Oh Woo; Myungkeun Oh; Kyle Nietfeld; Bailey Boehler; Yongki Choi
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.800

8.  Capillary flow-driven microfluidic device with wettability gradient and sedimentation effects for blood plasma separation.

Authors:  M Sneha Maria; P E Rakesh; T S Chandra; A K Sen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Novel Opportunities for Improving the Quality of Preanalytical Phase. A Glimpse to the Future?

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Janne Cadamuro
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  From Point-of-Care Testing to eHealth Diagnostic Devices (eDiagnostics).

Authors:  Dionysios C Christodouleas; Balwinder Kaur; Parthena Chorti
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 14.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.