| Literature DB >> 24822200 |
M R V Fernandes1, A E C S Azzolini1, M L L Martinez1, C R F Souza1, Y M Lucisano-Valim1, W P Oliveira1.
Abstract
This work evaluated the physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity of spray dried extracts (SDE) from Psidium guajava L. leaves. Different drying carriers, namely, maltodextrin, colloidal silicon dioxide, Arabic gum, and β -cyclodextrin at concentrations of 40 and 80% relative to solids content, were added to drying composition. SDE were characterized through determination of the total phenolic, tannins, and flavonoid content. Antioxidant potential of the SDE was assessed by two assays: cellular test that measures the luminol-enhanced chemiluminescence (LumCL) produced by neutrophils stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) and the DPPH radical scavenging (DPPH∗ method). In both assays the antioxidant activity of the SDE occurred in a concentration-dependent manner and showed no toxicity to the cells. Using the CLlum method, the IC50 ranged from 5.42 to 6.50 µg/mL. The IC50 of the SDE ranged from 7.96 to 8.11 µg/mL using the DPPH(•) method. Psidium guajava SDE presented significant antioxidant activity; thus they show high potential as an active phytopharmaceutical ingredient. Our findings in human neutrophils are pharmacologically relevant since they indicate that P. guajava SDE is a potential antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent in human cells.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24822200 PMCID: PMC4005054 DOI: 10.1155/2014/382891
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Drying carriers added to feed compositions.
| Samples code | Drying Aids | Ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|
| MA 80 | Maltodextrin DE10 : aerosil | 7 : 1 |
| MDEA 80 | Maltodextrin DE10 : gum Arabic : aerosil | 5 : 2 : 1 |
|
|
| 8 |
Equations used to determine the spray dryer performance.
| Parameter | Equation | Unit | Equation |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Product recovery ( |
| (%) g/g | (1) |
|
| |||
|
Thermal efficiency ( |
| (—) | (2) |
Mc: mass collected (g); X : product moisture content (g/g); W : flow rate of feed composition (g/min); C : concentration of total solids (g/g), θ: processing time (min); T gi: inlet gas temperature (°C); T go: outlet gas temperature (°C); T amb: environment temperature (°C).
Physicochemical characterization of the extractive solution (ES) and of concentrated extract (CE) of P. guajava.
| Samples |
|
| pH (—) | Alcoholic grade (°GL) | TF (mg/m db) | TP (% m/m db) | TT (% m/m db) | DPPH• 1 (µg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE | 3.27 (0.03) | 0.89 (0.00) | 5.94 (0.02) | 70 | 23.55 (0.01) | 26.29 (0.03) | 11.31 (0.02) | 3.94 (0.10) |
| CE | 10.7 (0.12) | 0.93 (0.00) | 4.90 (0.07) | 0 | 22.52 (0.01) | 23.17 (0.07) | 12.61 (0.10) | 3.34 (0.11) |
C : concentration of solids; ρ: density; TF: total flavonoids; TP: total polyphenols; TT: total tannins; db: dry base; antioxidant activity by the DPPH• method, expressed as IC50. Values are presented as the mean (standard deviation).
Spray dryer performance.
| Samples |
|
| RH (%) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA 80 | 109.0 | 28.9 | 42.1 | 51.38 | 33.9 |
| MDEA 80 | 100.0 | 21.2 | 46.6 | 59.63 | 38.8 |
|
| 102.0 | 20.2 | 58.1 | 61.48 | 37.0 |
T go: outlet gas temperature; T rm: room temperature; RH: relative humidity; R: product recovery; η: thermal efficiency.
Physical characterization of Psidium guajava spray dried extracts.
| Samples |
|
| Water solub. (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA 80 | 4.34 (0.18) | 0.16 (0.03) | 94.4 (1.9) | 13.3 (12.0) |
| MDEA 80 | 5.82 (0.36) | 0.19 (0.03) | 87.7 (5.7) | 12.1 (12.7) |
|
| 3.93 (0.05) | 0.18 (0.03) | 83.4 (1.6) | 15.8 (16.4) |
X : product moisture (Karl-Fischer titration); a : water activity *d : mean diameter of the particles (deviation of particle size distribution, not the mean particle size). Values are presented as the mean (standard deviation).
Figure 1Comparisons between the total polyphenols from the concentrated extract and spray dried extracts using the Kruskal-Wallis test (P < 0.05). ∗abStatistical difference determined by Dunn's posttest.
Figure 2Comparisons between the total tannins from the concentrated extract and spray dried extracts using the Kruskal-Wallis test (P < 0.05). abStatistical difference determined by Dunn's posttest.
Figure 3Comparisons between the total flavonoids from the concentrated extract and spray dried extracts using the Kruskal-Wallis test (P < 0.05). abStatistical difference determined by Dunn's posttest.
Antioxidant activity of the dry extracts of P. guajava using the DPPH• method.
| Samples | IC50 (µg/mL) | % Inhibition |
|---|---|---|
| MA 80 | 8.11 (0.05) | 88.5 (0.5) |
| MDEA 80 | 9.76 (0.21)* | 85.9 (0.9) |
| CD 80 | 7.96 (0.18) | 86.1 (0.8) |
| Conc. Ext. | 3.34 (0.11)* | 87.3 (0.6) |
| Quercetin | 0.96 (0.01) | 86.2 (0.9) |
P < 0.05. *Statistical difference determined by Dunn's posttest.
Values are presented as the mean (standard deviation).
Figure 4Modulatory effect of different concentrations of the extracts studied on ROS production in human neutrophils stimulated with PMA, determined by luminol-dependent chemiluminescence assay. (a) Conc. Ext. (concentrated extract) (b) MA 80, (c) MDEA 80, and (d) βCD 80. Data expressed as the integrated area of CL 0–20 min. The figure is representative of three independent experiments with similar profiles performed in duplicate.
Inhibitory effect of the concentrated extract and spray dried extracts of Psidium guajava on CLlum produced by neutrophils stimulated with PMA.
| Conc. (µg/mL)a | Percentage inhibition (%)b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conc. Ext. | MA 80 | MDEA 80 |
| |
| 1.25 | 22.40 (10.77) | 26.46 (1.56) | 26.36 (4.73) | 27.98 (4.92) |
| 2.5 | 35.23 (6.69) | 32.0 (6.79) | 37.54 (7.89) | 34.6 (8.60) |
| 5.0 | 48.25 (5.22) | 51.52 (8.68) | 50.72 (9.63) | 47.62 (9.11) |
| 25.0 | 74.37 (4.02) | 77.4 (8.55) | 77.27 (8.40) | 77.29 (10.0) |
| 50.0 | 86.39 (3.02) | 87.56 (5.99) | 88.76 (5.56) | 88.6 (7.95) |
|
| ||||
|
| 6.03 (1.77) | 5.54 (2.24) | 5.42 (2.85) | 6.50 (3.60) |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
|
| ||||
|
| 1.67 (1.57) | |||
aFinal concentration of the concentrated extract and spray dried product evaluated; bpercentage inhibition of CLlum produced by neutrophils stimulated with PMA.
Values are presented as the mean (standard deviation).
I C 50: sample concentration that promotes 50% inhibition of chemiluminescence.
n: number of independent experiments performed in duplicate.
IC50: P = 0.08 (no statistically significant difference was determined by Dunn's posttest).
Analysis of the cytotoxicity of concentrated extract and spray dried extracts of Psidium guajava on stimulated neutrophils.
| Samples | Viable cells (%)c Trypan blue | LDHd activity (U/mL) | Liberated LDH (% positive control)e |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive controla | — | 0.1516 (0.00) | 100 |
| Negative controlb | 96.5 (0.71) | 0.0126 (0.01) | 8.40 (5.85) |
| DMSO control (0.2%) | 97.0 (0.71) | 0.0166 (0.002) | 11.10 (1.55) |
| Conc. Ext. | 94.00 (2.83) | 0.0137 (0.02) | 7.58 (8.76) |
|
| 94.2 (3.18) | 0.0158 (0.01) | 10.53 (3.68) |
|
| 96.7 (1.06) | 0.0153 (0.001) | 10.20 (0.47) |
|
| 93.2 (1.06) | 0.0166 (0.00) | 11.07 (0.19) |
Values are presented as the mean (standard deviation). a1 × 106 neutrophils/mL lysed with 0.2% Triton X-100; b1 × 106 neutrophils/mL incubated with Hanks; DMSO: solvent control; c% of viable cells, determined by Trypan blue exclusion assay, based on counts of 200 cells; dLDH enzyme activity, evaluated by the Liquiform (Labtest Diagnóstica) LDH kit; epercentage of LDH liberated in the supernatant compared with neutrophils completely lysed with Triton X-100.