Andrea L Deierlein1, Maida P Galvez1, Irene H Yen2, Susan M Pinney3, Frank M Biro4, Lawrence H Kushi5, Susan Teitelbaum1, Mary S Wolff1. 1. 1Department of Preventive Medicine,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,17 East 102nd Street D3-130,New York,NY 10029,USA. 2. 2Department of Medicine,University of California at San Francisco,San Francisco,CA,USA. 3. 3Department of Environmental Health,University of Cincinnati College of Medicine,Cincinnati,OH,USA. 4. 4Division of Adolescent Medicine,Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center,Cincinnati,OH,USA. 5. 5Division of Research,Kaiser Permanente Northern California,Oakland,CA,USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe availability and frequency of use of local snack-food outlets and determine whether reported use of these outlets was associated with dietary intakes. DESIGN: Data were cross-sectional. Availability and frequency of use of three types of local snack-food outlets were reported. Daily dietary intakes were based on the average of up to four 24 h dietary recalls. Multivariable linear regression models estimated average daily intakes of energy, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) and snack foods/sweets associated with use of outlets. SETTING: Multi-site, observational cohort study in the USA, 2004-2006. SUBJECTS: Girls aged 6-8 years (n 1010). RESULTS: Weekly frequency of use of local snack-food outlets increased with number of available types of outlets. Girls with access to only one type of outlet reported consuming food/beverage items less frequently than girls with access to two or three types of outlets (P <0·001). Girls' daily energy, SSB and snack foods/sweets intakes increased with greater use of outlets. Girls who reported using outlets>1 to 3 times/week consumed 0·27 (95 % CI 0·13, 0·40) servings of SSB more daily than girls who reported no use. Girls who reported using outlets>3 times/week consumed 449·61 (95 % CI 134·93, 764·29) kJ, 0·43 (95 % CI 0·29, 0·58) servings of SSB and 0·38 (95 % CI 0·12, 0·65) servings of snack foods/sweets more daily than those who reported no use. CONCLUSIONS: Girls' frequency of use of local snack-food outlets increases with the number of available types of outlets and is associated with greater daily intakes of energy and servings of SSB and snack foods/sweets.
OBJECTIVE: To describe availability and frequency of use of local snack-food outlets and determine whether reported use of these outlets was associated with dietary intakes. DESIGN: Data were cross-sectional. Availability and frequency of use of three types of local snack-food outlets were reported. Daily dietary intakes were based on the average of up to four 24 h dietary recalls. Multivariable linear regression models estimated average daily intakes of energy, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) and snack foods/sweets associated with use of outlets. SETTING: Multi-site, observational cohort study in the USA, 2004-2006. SUBJECTS:Girls aged 6-8 years (n 1010). RESULTS: Weekly frequency of use of local snack-food outlets increased with number of available types of outlets. Girls with access to only one type of outlet reported consuming food/beverage items less frequently than girls with access to two or three types of outlets (P <0·001). Girls' daily energy, SSB and snack foods/sweets intakes increased with greater use of outlets. Girls who reported using outlets>1 to 3 times/week consumed 0·27 (95 % CI 0·13, 0·40) servings of SSB more daily than girls who reported no use. Girls who reported using outlets>3 times/week consumed 449·61 (95 % CI 134·93, 764·29) kJ, 0·43 (95 % CI 0·29, 0·58) servings of SSB and 0·38 (95 % CI 0·12, 0·65) servings of snack foods/sweets more daily than those who reported no use. CONCLUSIONS:Girls' frequency of use of local snack-food outlets increases with the number of available types of outlets and is associated with greater daily intakes of energy and servings of SSB and snack foods/sweets.
Authors: Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Jill Reedy; Eboneé N Butler; Kevin W Dodd; Amy F Subar; Frances E Thompson; Robin A McKinnon Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Meizi He; Patricia Tucker; Jennifer D Irwin; Jason Gilliland; Kristian Larsen; Paul Hess Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Cindy W Leung; Barbara A Laraia; Maggi Kelly; Dana Nickleach; Nancy E Adler; Lawrence H Kushi; Irene H Yen Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Brian E Saelens; James F Sallis; Lawrence D Frank; Sarah C Couch; Chuan Zhou; Trina Colburn; Kelli L Cain; James Chapman; Karen Glanz Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Andraea Van Hulst; Tracie A Barnett; Lise Gauvin; Mark Daniel; Yan Kestens; Madeleine Bird; Katherine Gray-Donald; Marie Lambert Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2012-07-26
Authors: S M Pinney; G C Windham; C Xie; R L Herrick; A M Calafat; K McWhorter; C S Fassler; R A Hiatt; L H Kushi; F M Biro Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 5.840