Literature DB >> 24819098

Low anterior resection syndrome and quality of life: an international multicenter study.

Therese Juul1, Madelene Ahlberg, Sebastiano Biondo, Eloy Espin, Luis Miguel Jimenez, Klaus E Matzel, Gabriella Jansson Palmer, Anna Sauermann, Loris Trenti, Wei Zhang, Søren Laurberg, Peter Christensen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of patients are surviving a diagnosis of rectal cancer. The majority of the patients are treated with the sphincter-sparing surgical procedure low anterior resection, and 50% to 90% of these patients experience bowel dysfunction, known as the low anterior resection syndrome. No previous studies have investigated the association between the low anterior resection syndrome and quality of life in an international setting with the use of a validated instrument for the classification of the low anterior resection syndrome.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between quality of life and the low anterior resection syndrome in European patients who have had rectal cancer.
DESIGN: The study was designed as an international cross-sectional study involving 5 centers in 4 European countries. PATIENTS: All patients had undergone low anterior resection for rectal cancer, had no stoma, had no dissemination or recurrence at the time of the study, and were at least 16 months past surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: The patients received by mail the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score and the quality-of-life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eight subscales were selected to be the focus of this study: global quality of life; physical, role, emotional, and social functioning; fatigue; constipation; and diarrhea.
RESULTS: A total of 796 patients were included, which corresponds to a response rate of 75.0%. In comparison with patients without low anterior resection syndrome, patients with major low anterior resection syndrome fared substantially worse in all selected subscales (difference ≥ 10 points, p < 0.01), with the exception of constipation. LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional design prevents an evaluation of causality.
CONCLUSIONS: The quality of life of patients who have had rectal cancer is closely associated with the severity of the low anterior resection syndrome. Therefore, it is important that clinicians and researchers focus on this syndrome to improve the prevention and the treatment of bowel dysfunction and the information given to patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24819098     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  64 in total

1.  Quality of life in non-early rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy and endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Giancarlo D'Ambrosio; Alessandro M Paganini; Andrea Balla; Silvia Quaresima; Pietro Ursi; Paolo Bruzzone; Andrea Picchetto; Fabrizio I Mattei; Emanuele Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  [Late complications and functional disorders after rectal resection : Prevention, detection and therapy].

Authors:  J Reibetanz; M Kim; C-T Germer; N Schlegel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Overlooked Long-Term Complications of Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Matthew D Giglia; Sharon L Stein
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-04-02

4.  Two-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through coloanal anastomosis versus coloanal anastomosis with protective loop ileostomy for low rectal cancer. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial (Turnbull-BCN).

Authors:  Sebastiano Biondo; Loris Trenti; Ana Galvez; Eloy Espin-Basany; Francesco Bianco; Giovanni Romano; Esther Kreisler
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Side-to-end vs. straight stapled colorectal anastomosis after low anterior resection: results of randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  E G Rybakov; D Yu Pikunov; O Yu Fomenko; S V Chernyshov; Yu A Shelygin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Current Management and Future Directions.

Authors:  Timothy J Ridolfi; Nicholas Berger; Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

Review 7.  The incidence and risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving surgery of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rui Sun; Ziyi Dai; Yin Zhang; Junyang Lu; Yuelun Zhang; Yi Xiao
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Patient-Reported Unmet Needs in Colorectal Cancer Survivors After Treatment for Curative Intent.

Authors:  Joceline Vuong-Thu Vu; Niki Matusko; Samantha Hendren; Scott E Regenbogen; Karin M Hardiman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Predictors of Bowel Function in Long-term Rectal Cancer Survivors with Anastomosis.

Authors:  Mubarika Alavi; Christopher S Wendel; Robert S Krouse; Larissa Temple; Mark C Hornbrook; Joanna E Bulkley; Carmit K McMullen; Marcia Grant; Lisa J Herrinton
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation for Bowel Dysfunction After Intersphincteric Resection for Lower Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hideaki Nishigori; Masayuki Ishii; Yujiro Kokado; Kouji Fujimoto; Hiroshi Higashiyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.