AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to investigate whether small doses of intense exercise before each main meal ('exercise snacks') would result in better blood glucose control than a single bout of prolonged, continuous, moderate-intensity exercise in individuals with insulin resistance. METHODS: Nine individuals completed three exercise interventions in randomised order. Measures were recorded across 3 days with exercise performed on the middle day, as either: (1) traditional continuous exercise (CONT), comprising 30 min moderate-intensity (60% of maximal heart rate [HRmax]) incline walking before dinner; (2) exercise snacking (ES), consisting of 6 × 1 min intense (90% HRmax) incline walking intervals 30 min before each meal; or (3) composite exercise snacking (CES), encompassing 6 × 1 min intervals alternating between walking and resistance-based exercise, 30 min before meals. Meal timing and composition were controlled within participants for exercise interventions. RESULTS:ES attenuated mean 3 h postprandial glucose concentration following breakfast (by 1.4 ± 1.5 mmol/l, p = 0.02) but not lunch (0.4 ± 1.0 mmol/l, p = 0.22), and was more effective than CONT following dinner (0.7 ± 1.5 mmol/l below CONT; p = 0.04). ES also reduced 24 h mean glucose concentration by 0.7 ± 0.6 mmol/l (p = 0.01) and this reduction persisted for the subsequent 24 h (lower by 0.6 ± 0.4 mmol/l vs CONT, relative to their baselines; p = 0.01). CES was just as effective as ES (p > 0.05 for all glycaemic variables) at improving glycaemic control. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Dosing exercise as brief, intense 'exercise snacks' before main meals is a time-efficient and effective approach to improve glycaemic control in individuals with insulin resistance.
RCT Entities:
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to investigate whether small doses of intense exercise before each main meal ('exercise snacks') would result in better blood glucose control than a single bout of prolonged, continuous, moderate-intensity exercise in individuals with insulin resistance. METHODS: Nine individuals completed three exercise interventions in randomised order. Measures were recorded across 3 days with exercise performed on the middle day, as either: (1) traditional continuous exercise (CONT), comprising 30 min moderate-intensity (60% of maximal heart rate [HRmax]) incline walking before dinner; (2) exercise snacking (ES), consisting of 6 × 1 min intense (90% HRmax) incline walking intervals 30 min before each meal; or (3) composite exercise snacking (CES), encompassing 6 × 1 min intervals alternating between walking and resistance-based exercise, 30 min before meals. Meal timing and composition were controlled within participants for exercise interventions. RESULTS:ES attenuated mean 3 h postprandial glucose concentration following breakfast (by 1.4 ± 1.5 mmol/l, p = 0.02) but not lunch (0.4 ± 1.0 mmol/l, p = 0.22), and was more effective than CONT following dinner (0.7 ± 1.5 mmol/l below CONT; p = 0.04). ES also reduced 24 h mean glucose concentration by 0.7 ± 0.6 mmol/l (p = 0.01) and this reduction persisted for the subsequent 24 h (lower by 0.6 ± 0.4 mmol/l vs CONT, relative to their baselines; p = 0.01). CES was just as effective as ES (p > 0.05 for all glycaemic variables) at improving glycaemic control. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Dosing exercise as brief, intense 'exercise snacks' before main meals is a time-efficient and effective approach to improve glycaemic control in individuals with insulin resistance.
Authors: Stephan F E Praet; Ralph J F Manders; Ruth C R Meex; A G Lieverse; Coen D A Stehouwer; Harm Kuipers; Hans A Keizer; Luc J C van Loon Journal: Clin Sci (Lond) Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 6.124
Authors: Jenna B Gillen; Michael E Percival; Alison Ludzki; Mark A Tarnopolsky; Martin J Gibala Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2013-05-31 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Jonathan P Little; Jenna B Gillen; Michael E Percival; Adeel Safdar; Mark A Tarnopolsky; Zubin Punthakee; Mary E Jung; Martin J Gibala Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2011-08-25
Authors: Jaana Lindström; Pirjo Ilanne-Parikka; Markku Peltonen; Sirkka Aunola; Johan G Eriksson; Katri Hemiö; Helena Hämäläinen; Pirjo Härkönen; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; Mauri Laakso; Anne Louheranta; Marjo Mannelin; Merja Paturi; Jouko Sundvall; Timo T Valle; Matti Uusitupa; Jaakko Tuomilehto Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-11-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: A Ceriello; N Bortolotti; E Motz; A Crescentini; S Lizzio; A Russo; L Tonutti; C Taboga Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Ronald J Sigal; Glen P Kenny; Normand G Boulé; George A Wells; Denis Prud'homme; Michelle Fortier; Robert D Reid; Heather Tulloch; Douglas Coyle; Penny Phillips; Alison Jennings; James Jaffey Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-09-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Monique E Francois; Cody Durrer; Kevin J Pistawka; Frank A Halperin; Jonathan P Little Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Jonathan P Little; Jodi Langley; Michael Lee; Etienne Myette-Côté; Garett Jackson; Cody Durrer; Martin J Gibala; Mary E Jung Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Jakob S Hansen; Xinjie Zhao; Martin Irmler; Xinyu Liu; Miriam Hoene; Mika Scheler; Yanjie Li; Johannes Beckers; Martin Hrabĕ de Angelis; Hans-Ulrich Häring; Bente K Pedersen; Rainer Lehmann; Guowang Xu; Peter Plomgaard; Cora Weigert Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Gunes Uzer; William R Thompson; Buer Sen; Zhihui Xie; Sherwin S Yen; Sean Miller; Guniz Bas; Maya Styner; Clinton T Rubin; Stefan Judex; Keith Burridge; Janet Rubin Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 6.277