Literature DB >> 24816980

[E-learning in orthopedics and traumatology. A comparative pilot study on acceptance and knowledge acquisition among users and non-users].

E Hoff1, N Haberstroh, K Sostmann, C Perka, M Putzier, G Schmidmaier, D A Back.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Additional internet-based learning tools (e-learning) are successfully used in the curricula of many disciplines and are highly accepted among students. However, in orthopedics and traumatology e-learning is underrepresented and scientific papers are rare. The aim of the present pilot study was to evaluate the acceptance of the e-learning module network for students in traumatology and orthopedics (NESTOR) among users and non-users and to analyze the effect of this additional learning tool on knowledge acquisition.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 544 students were asked to complete evaluation questionnaires at the end of two semesters using different ones for NESTOR users and non-users. The gain of knowledge was analyzed by two written knowledge tests (pre-post test, 20 multiple choice questions) at the beginning and end of the semester comparing these two groups.
RESULTS: A total of 191 students took part in the evaluation and 152 completed both written tests. The NESTOR users showed a high acceptance of the e-learning system and non-users considered e-learning beneficial as well. Reasons given for not using NESTOR were lack of time, lack of information about the existence of NESTOR and a lack of interest in this discipline and e-learning in general. Both groups significantly increased their level of knowledge during the course of the semester (p < 0.01), whereas users scored significantly higher in the post-test (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The presented data support the high acceptance among users and the benefit of the e-learning project NESTOR in teaching students in orthopedics and traumatology. Based on experience and these results the permanent implementation of an additional e-learning module in the curriculum can be recommended for other faculties. In this process the critical comments of the non-users determined in the present study should be addressed.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24816980     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-014-2313-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  27 in total

Review 1.  The role of blended learning in the clinical education of healthcare students: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Rowe; Jose Frantz; Vivienne Bozalek
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  [The bone and joint decade--chances for orthopedics and traumatic surgery].

Authors:  Karsten E Dreinhöfer
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.923

Review 3.  Joining the podcast revolution.

Authors:  Bruno C Jham; Gabriela V Duraes; Howard E Strassler; Luis G Sensi
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Blended learning positively affects students' satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: results of a mixed-method evaluation.

Authors:  Vanessa Woltering; Andreas Herrler; Klaus Spitzer; Cord Spreckelsen
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.853

5.  [A radiological case collection with interactive character as a new element in the education of medical students].

Authors:  T Heye; P Kurz; M Eiers; G W Kauffmann; A Schipp
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2008-04

6.  [Undergraduate education in orthopaedic and trauma surgery - a nationwide survey in Germany].

Authors:  M Ruesseler; U Obertacke; K E Dreinhöfer; C Waydhas; I Marzi; F Walcher
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 0.923

7.  [A web-based e-learning tool in academic teaching of trauma surgery. First experiences and evaluation results].

Authors:  M Citak; C Haasper; M Behrends; T Kupka; D Kendoff; T Hüfner; H K Matthies; C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Optimal sequencing of bedside teaching and computer-based learning: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Peter Hull; Adnan Chaudry; Anna Prasthofer; Giles Pattison
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  Interactive e-learning courses in human genetics: usage and evaluation by science and medical students at the faculty of medicin.

Authors:  Frank Oeffner; Christine Schäfer; Barbara Fritz; Aurelia Lara Fuchs; Alexander Rauschendorf; Rainer König; Jürgen Kunz
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2011-08-08

10.  Improving education in primary care: development of an online curriculum using the blended learning model.

Authors:  Linda Orkin Lewin; Mamta Singh; Betzi L Bateman; Pamela Bligh Glover
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.