Britt McKinnon1, Sam Harper2, Jay S Kaufman2, Yves Bergevin2. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada and United Nations Population Fund, New York, USA brittmckinnon@gmail.com. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada and United Nations Population Fund, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several countries in sub-Saharan Africa have recently adopted policies that remove user fees for facility-based delivery services. There is little rigorous evidence of the impact of these policies on utilization of delivery services and no evaluations have examined effects on neonatal mortality rates (NMR). In this article, we estimate the causal effect of removing user fees on the proportion of births delivered in facilities, the proportion of births delivered by Caesarean section, and NMR. METHODS: We used data from Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in 10 African countries between 1997 and 2012. Kenya, Ghana and Senegal adopted policies removing user fees for facility-based deliveries between 2003 and 2007, while seven other countries not changing user fee policies were used as controls. We used a difference-in-differences (DD) regression approach to control for secular trends in the outcomes that are common across countries and for time invariant differences between countries. RESULTS: According to covariate-adjusted DD models, the policy change was consistent with an increase of 3.1 facility-based deliveries per 100 live births (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9, 5.2) and an estimated reduction of 2.9 neonatal deaths per 1000 births (95% CI: -6.8, 1.0). In relative terms, this corresponds to a 5% increase in facility deliveries and a 9% reduction in NMR. There was no evidence of an increase in Caesarean deliveries. We examined lead and lag-time effects, finding evidence that facility deliveries continued to increase following fee removal. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest removing user fees increased facility-based deliveries and possibly contributed to a reduction in NMR. Evidence from this evaluation may be useful to governments weighing the potential benefits of removing user fees. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
BACKGROUND: Several countries in sub-Saharan Africa have recently adopted policies that remove user fees for facility-based delivery services. There is little rigorous evidence of the impact of these policies on utilization of delivery services and no evaluations have examined effects on neonatal mortality rates (NMR). In this article, we estimate the causal effect of removing user fees on the proportion of births delivered in facilities, the proportion of births delivered by Caesarean section, and NMR. METHODS: We used data from Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in 10 African countries between 1997 and 2012. Kenya, Ghana and Senegal adopted policies removing user fees for facility-based deliveries between 2003 and 2007, while seven other countries not changing user fee policies were used as controls. We used a difference-in-differences (DD) regression approach to control for secular trends in the outcomes that are common across countries and for time invariant differences between countries. RESULTS: According to covariate-adjusted DD models, the policy change was consistent with an increase of 3.1 facility-based deliveries per 100 live births (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9, 5.2) and an estimated reduction of 2.9 neonatal deaths per 1000 births (95% CI: -6.8, 1.0). In relative terms, this corresponds to a 5% increase in facility deliveries and a 9% reduction in NMR. There was no evidence of an increase in Caesarean deliveries. We examined lead and lag-time effects, finding evidence that facility deliveries continued to increase following fee removal. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest removing user fees increased facility-based deliveries and possibly contributed to a reduction in NMR. Evidence from this evaluation may be useful to governments weighing the potential benefits of removing user fees. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Authors: Joy E Lawn; Mary V Kinney; Robert E Black; Catherine Pitt; Simon Cousens; Kate Kerber; Erica Corbett; Allisyn C Moran; Claudia S Morrissey; Mikkel Z Oestergaard Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Mikkel Zahle Oestergaard; Mie Inoue; Sachiyo Yoshida; Wahyu Retno Mahanani; Fiona M Gore; Simon Cousens; Joy E Lawn; Colin Douglas Mathers Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2011-08-30 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Alexi C Matousek; Stephen R Addington; Joseph Kahan; Herriot Sannon; Thelius Luckner; Chauvet Exe; Rodolphe R Eisenhower Jean Louis; Stuart Lipsitz; John G Meara; Robert Riviello Journal: World J Surg Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Cheick Oumar Tiendrebeogo; Vena Joseph; Frank Bicaba; Alice Bila; Abel Bicaba; Thomas Druetz Journal: J Glob Health Date: 2022-10-14 Impact factor: 7.664