Literature DB >> 24816536

Pretreatment with remifentanil, fentanyl, or lidocaine to prevent withdrawal after rocuronium using venous occlusion technique in children and adolescents: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study.

S A Abu-Halaweh1, A K Aloweidi, I Y Qudaisat, M O Al-Hussami, K R Al Zaben, A S Abu-Halaweh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain caused by intravenous injection of the muscle relaxant rocuronium bromide is common in children and adolescents. The cause of this unwanted effect is still unclear, and different pretreatment drugs have been administered in attempts to alleviate this side effect, with varying degrees of success.
PURPOSE: This study used a 60-s venous occlusion technique to evaluate the effectiveness of pretreatment with lidocaine, fentanyl, or remifentanil in preventing pain-induced withdrawal caused by intravenous injection of rocuronium bromide during the induction of general anesthesia.
METHOD: One hundred and one child and adolescent patients, ASA Ι-II, requiring various surgical procedures under general anesthesia with muscle relaxation and mechanical ventilation, were enrolled. Patients were allocated randomly using computer-generated randomization into one of four pretreatment groups: a remifentanil group (1 µg/kg, n = 25), fentanyl group (1 µg/kg, n = 26), lidocaine 1% group (0.5 mg/kg, n = 25), and normal saline group (n = 25). Drug doses were prepared in normal saline to a total volume of 5 ml. Venous occlusion was applied 10 cm above the venous access site. Pretreatment drugs were injected and retained for 60 s at the site of injection by an anesthetist blinded to group allocation. After release of the tourniquet, rocuronium (0.5 mg/kg) was then injected over 5 s, and withdrawal was recorded by another anesthetist blinded to group allocation. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and a chi-squared test were used to statistically analyze the results as appropriate.
RESULTS: Compared to normal saline, all other pretreatment groups scored a significantly lower mean of withdrawal response (P < 0.001). Lidocaine was superior to both remifentanil (P < 0.05) and fentanyl (P < 0.05) in suppressing the withdrawal response to rocuronium injection. Remifentanil was superior to fentanyl in suppressing the withdrawal response caused by rocuronium injection (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Using a venous occlusion technique for 60 s, lidocaine was found to be most effective in preventing the withdrawal effect caused by rocuronium injection in children and adolescents. Lidocaine was superior to remifentanil which, in turn, was more effective than fentanyl.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24816536     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-014-1836-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  23 in total

1.  Pain on injection of rocuronium bromide.

Authors:  M A Steegers; E N Robertson
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Rocuronium-induced generalized spontaneous movements cause pulmonary aspiration.

Authors:  Jiin-Tarng Lui; Shin-Jen Huang; Ching-Yue Yang; Jee-Ching Hsu; Ping-Wing Lui
Journal:  Chang Gung Med J       Date:  2002-09

3.  Pain on injection of rocuronium: influence of two doses of lidocaine pretreatment.

Authors:  K F Cheong; W H Wong
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Venous occlusion with lidocaine for preventing propofol induced pain. A prospective double-blind randomized study.

Authors:  Islam M Massad; Hamdi M Abu-Ali; Sami A Abu-Halaweh; Izdiad Z Badran
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  Effects of fentanyl and sufentanil on peripheral mammalian nerves.

Authors:  A J Gissen; L D Gugino; S Datta; J Miller; B G Covino
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  The use of lidocaine for preventing the withdrawal associated with the injection of rocuronium in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Y Shevchenko; J C Jocson; V A McRae; S A Stayer; R E Schwartz; M Rehman; D K Choudhry
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Prevention of withdrawal movement associated with injection of rocuronium in children: comparison of remifentanil, alfentanil and fentanyl.

Authors:  A Y Oh; K S Seo; E K Goo; Y O Park; S J Kim; J H Kim
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.105

8.  A comparison of the local anesthetic effects of meperidine, fentanyl, and sufentanil on dorsal root axons.

Authors:  R A Jaffe; M A Rowe
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Comparison of the effectiveness of pretreatment by fentanyl and remifentanil on rocuronium induced injection pain.

Authors:  Mine Sari; Leyla Iyilikci; Selen Bayindir; Hulya Ellidokuz; Ali Gunerli
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.484

10.  Rocuronium-induced withdrawal movement: influence of ketorolac or a combination of lidocaine and ketorolac pretreatment.

Authors:  Younghoon Jeon; Jae Hyun Ha; Jeong-Eun Lee; Hyung-Chul Lee; Taeha Ryu; Kyung-Hwa Kwak
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-01-21
View more
  5 in total

1.  Preventive effect of a vapocoolant spray on propofol-induced pain: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study.

Authors:  Young Eun Moon; Michael Y Lee; Dong Hyun Kim
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Prevention of Withdrawal Movement Associated with the Injection of Rocuronium in Children: Comparison of Paracetamol and Lidocaine.

Authors:  Reyhan Polat; Mine Akın; Gülsen Keskin; Dilek Ünal; Aslı Dönmez
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2016-04-01

3.  Pretreatment with Oxycodone Simultaneously Reduces Etomidate-Induced Myoclonus and Rocuronium-Induced Withdrawal Movements During Rapid-Sequence Induction.

Authors:  Xiaoxia An; Caixia Li; Zayd Sahebally; Xiaohong Wen; Bing Zhao; Xiangming Fang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-10-19

Review 4.  Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for reducing rocuronium bromide induced pain on injection in children and adults.

Authors:  Hemanshu Prabhakar; Gyaninder Pal Singh; Zulfiqar Ali; Mani Kalaivani; Martha A Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-12

5.  Time interval between alfentanil and rocuronium administration necessary to prevent rocuronium-induced withdrawal movement.

Authors:  Xiao-Dan Wang; Ling-Yang Chen; Chun-Lian Zhou; Hai-Tao Cong; Nan-Jin Chen; Ming-Cang Wang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.