Alexander H Flannery1, Melissa L Thompson Bastin2. 1. University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA alex.flannery@uky.edu. 2. University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the literature for published reports regarding the efficacy of standard versus higher dosing of oseltamivir in critically ill patients with severe influenza. DATA SOURCES: An English-language literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (1966-February 2014) using the terms oseltamivir and influenza limited to humans and adults older than 19 years. Additional articles were identified through a manual search of the references obtained from the MEDLINE search. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Articles were manually screened for inclusion related to pharmacokinetic or clinical studies comparing varying doses of oseltamivir, particularly in the critically ill patient population. Studies investigating the pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were also included. DATA SYNTHESIS: During the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, the World Health Organization suggested 150 mg twice daily as a consideration in critically ill patients with severe influenza. The basis for the recommendation can be traced back to animal studies investigating the H5N1 virus. Three different studies in humans investigating higher doses in severe influenza have found no differences in clinical outcomes between standard and higher dosing. Pharmacokinetic studies suggest adequate absorption in critically ill patients. Although no dosage adjustment appears to be needed for ECMO patients, reduction may berequired for CRRT.. CONCLUSIONS: . Although additional data are needed for a definitive conclusion, the small body of literature available in humans does not support routine use of high-dose oseltamivir in critically ill patients.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the literature for published reports regarding the efficacy of standard versus higher dosing of oseltamivir in critically illpatients with severe influenza. DATA SOURCES: An English-language literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (1966-February 2014) using the terms oseltamivir and influenza limited to humans and adults older than 19 years. Additional articles were identified through a manual search of the references obtained from the MEDLINE search. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Articles were manually screened for inclusion related to pharmacokinetic or clinical studies comparing varying doses of oseltamivir, particularly in the critically illpatient population. Studies investigating the pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were also included. DATA SYNTHESIS: During the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, the World Health Organization suggested 150 mg twice daily as a consideration in critically illpatients with severe influenza. The basis for the recommendation can be traced back to animal studies investigating the H5N1 virus. Three different studies in humans investigating higher doses in severe influenza have found no differences in clinical outcomes between standard and higher dosing. Pharmacokinetic studies suggest adequate absorption in critically illpatients. Although no dosage adjustment appears to be needed for ECMO patients, reduction may berequired for CRRT.. CONCLUSIONS: . Although additional data are needed for a definitive conclusion, the small body of literature available in humans does not support routine use of high-dose oseltamivir in critically illpatients.
Authors: Timothy M Uyeki; Henry H Bernstein; John S Bradley; Janet A Englund; Thomas M File; Alicia M Fry; Stefan Gravenstein; Frederick G Hayden; Scott A Harper; Jon Mark Hirshon; Michael G Ison; B Lynn Johnston; Shandra L Knight; Allison McGeer; Laura E Riley; Cameron R Wolfe; Paul E Alexander; Andrew T Pavia Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Katharina Karsch; Xi Chen; Oliver Miera; Björn Peters; Patrick Obermeier; Roland C Francis; Válerie Amann; Susanne Duwe; Pieter Fraaij; Alla Heider; Marcel de Zwart; Felix Berger; Albert Osterhaus; Brunhilde Schweiger; Barbara Rath Journal: Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 2.441
Authors: Carmen Andrea Pfortmueller; Maria Teresa Barbani; Joerg Christian Schefold; Elias Hage; Albert Heim; Stefan Zimmerli Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 3.425