Literature DB >> 24814293

Accuracy analysis of a novel electromagnetic navigation procedure versus a standard minimally invasive method for arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular joint reconstructions.

Michael Hoffmann1, Malte Schroeder2, Maximilian Hartel2, Michael Korecki2, Johannes M Rueger2, Jacob V Nüchtern2, Wolfgang Lehmann2, Jan P Petersen2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this cadaveric study was to evaluate the accuracy, feasibility, and operation time of a novel electromagnetic navigation system (ENS) and procedure for transclavicular-transcoracoid tunnel placement compared with a standard minimally invasive (SMI) reconstruction method for minimally invasive arthroscopically assisted anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.
METHODS: Ten arthroscopically assisted electromagnetic-navigated transclavicular-transcoracoid drilling procedures and 10 SMI procedures were performed on 10 human cadavers using 2 TightRope reconstructions (Arthrex, Naples, FL) for each site. Postoperative computed tomography scans were acquired to determine tunnel placement accuracy. Optimal coracoid tunnel placement was defined according to the anatomic insertions of the trapezoid and conoid ligaments with the oblong button placed in a center-base position at the coracoid undersurface without cortical breach or fracture. Both reconstruction procedures were performed without fluoroscopy.
RESULTS: Successful tunnel placement was accomplished in 98.8% using the ENS method and in 83.8% using the SMI procedure (P = .087). The mean overall operation time was 28.5 ± 6.6 minutes for the ENS method and 35.2 ± 3.9 minutes for the SMI method (P = .012). The ENS procedure required no directional readjustments or restarts. Drill misguidance with subsequent cortical breach occurred twice in the SMI group. In both groups no fractures were documented.
CONCLUSIONS: In this descriptive laboratory study, both the ENS and the SMI techniques achieved the desired anatomic reconstruction. Compared with the SMI method, the ENS procedure showed higher accuracy, required a shorter operation time, and was associated with no complications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Length of surgery, drilling accuracy, and reduction of radiation exposure in acromioclavicular joint reconstruction procedures affect the safety of both patients and surgeons.
Copyright © 2014 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24814293     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  3 in total

1.  Nontraumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head : Arthroscopic and navigation-supported core decompression.

Authors:  Jan Theopold; Sarah Armonies; Philipp Pieroh; Pierre Hepp; Andreas Roth
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic and navigation-assisted two tunnel technique for coracoclavicular ligament augmentation of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Jan Theopold; Ralf Henkelmann; Claus Zhang; Tobias Schöbel; Georg Osterhoff; Pierre Hepp
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Arthroscopically guided navigation for repair of acromioclavicular joint dislocations: a safe technique with reduced intraoperative radiation exposure.

Authors:  Jan Theopold; Bastian Marquass; Nikolaus von Dercks; Maria Mütze; Ralf Henkelmann; Christoph Josten; Pierre Hepp
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2015-12-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.