John T Lucas1, Jeffrey G Kuremsky2, Mike Soike2, William W Hinson2, William T Kearns2, Carnell J Hampton3, A William Blackstock2, James Urbanic2. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, NC, United States. Electronic address: johnthomas75@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, NC, United States. 3. Southeastern Radiation Oncology Physics Group, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, NC, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and accelerated hypofractionated radiation therapy (AHRT) have favorable local control (LC) relative to conventional fractionation in the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report the results of our single institution experience with the treatment of early stage NSCLC with SBRT or AHRT in cases where SBRT was felt to be suboptimal. METHODS: One hundred and sixty patients with Stage 1 and node negative Stage 2 NSCLC were treated with SBRT or AHRT from 2003 to 2011. Median follow-up was 29.4 and 19 months (mo), respectively. The median dose was 54Gy in 3 fractions (fx) (SBRT) and 70.2Gy in 26 fx (AHRT). Acute and late toxicities (tox) were graded (G) per CTCAE v4. Time to local (LF), regional (RF) and distant (DF) failure were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The impact of patient and tumor related factors on LF were estimated by multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Three-year LC rates were 87.7% (SBRT) and 71.7% (AHRT). The 3-year freedom from DF was 73.3% and 68.1%. Median OS was 38.4 (95% CI 29.7-51.6) and 35 (95% CI 22-48.3) mo. No G3 or 4 tox were observed. At 1 year, 30% and 50% of complications resolved, while (5-6%) had persistent chest wall pain. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that increasing dose per fraction and tumor size (>5.5 vs. 4cm) in the AHRT and SBRT group were found to be associated with a reduced (HR 0.33 95% CI 0.13-0.84, p=0.021) and increased (HR: 6.372 95% CI 1.23-32.92, p=0.027) hazard for local failure respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results compare favorably with other reports of treatment for early stage NSCLC. AHRT patients had comparable LC despite increased size and central disease. Toxicity was limited and overall survival, regional and distant recurrences were similar between groups. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and accelerated hypofractionated radiation therapy (AHRT) have favorable local control (LC) relative to conventional fractionation in the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report the results of our single institution experience with the treatment of early stage NSCLC with SBRT or AHRT in cases where SBRT was felt to be suboptimal. METHODS: One hundred and sixty patients with Stage 1 and node negative Stage 2 NSCLC were treated with SBRT or AHRT from 2003 to 2011. Median follow-up was 29.4 and 19 months (mo), respectively. The median dose was 54Gy in 3 fractions (fx) (SBRT) and 70.2Gy in 26 fx (AHRT). Acute and late toxicities (tox) were graded (G) per CTCAE v4. Time to local (LF), regional (RF) and distant (DF) failure were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The impact of patient and tumor related factors on LF were estimated by multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Three-year LC rates were 87.7% (SBRT) and 71.7% (AHRT). The 3-year freedom from DF was 73.3% and 68.1%. Median OS was 38.4 (95% CI 29.7-51.6) and 35 (95% CI 22-48.3) mo. No G3 or 4 tox were observed. At 1 year, 30% and 50% of complications resolved, while (5-6%) had persistent chest wall pain. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that increasing dose per fraction and tumor size (>5.5 vs. 4cm) in the AHRT and SBRT group were found to be associated with a reduced (HR 0.33 95% CI 0.13-0.84, p=0.021) and increased (HR: 6.372 95% CI 1.23-32.92, p=0.027) hazard for local failure respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results compare favorably with other reports of treatment for early stage NSCLC. AHRT patients had comparable LC despite increased size and central disease. Toxicity was limited and overall survival, regional and distant recurrences were similar between groups. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Authors: Robert Timmerman; Rebecca Paulus; James Galvin; Jeffrey Michalski; William Straube; Jeffrey Bradley; Achilles Fakiris; Andrea Bezjak; Gregory Videtic; David Johnstone; Jack Fowler; Elizabeth Gore; Hak Choy Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Stanley H Benedict; Kamil M Yenice; David Followill; James M Galvin; William Hinson; Brian Kavanagh; Paul Keall; Michael Lovelock; Sanford Meeks; Lech Papiez; Thomas Purdie; Ramaswamy Sadagopan; Michael C Schell; Bill Salter; David J Schlesinger; Almon S Shiu; Timothy Solberg; Danny Y Song; Volker Stieber; Robert Timmerman; Wolfgang A Tomé; Dirk Verellen; Lu Wang; Fang-Fang Yin Journal: Med Phys Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Joe Y Chang; Peter A Balter; Lei Dong; Qiuan Yang; Zhongxing Liao; Melenda Jeter; M Kara Bucci; Mary F McAleer; Reza J Mehran; Jack A Roth; Ritsuko Komaki Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jeffrey A Bogart; Lydia Hodgson; Stephen L Seagren; A William Blackstock; Xiaofei Wang; Robert Lenox; Andrew T Turrisi; John Reilly; Ajeet Gajra; Everett E Vokes; Mark R Green Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jeffrey Bradley; Wade L Thorstad; Sasa Mutic; Tom R Miller; Farrokh Dehdashti; Barry A Siegel; Walter Bosch; Rudi J Bertrand Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-05-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Inga S Grills; Victor S Mangona; Robert Welsh; Gary Chmielewski; Erika McInerney; Shannon Martin; Jennifer Wloch; Hong Ye; Larry L Kestin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-01-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Feng Liu; An Tai; Percy Lee; Tithi Biswas; George X Ding; Isaam El Naqa; Jimm Grimm; Andrew Jackson; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Tamara LaCouture; Billy Loo; Moyed Miften; Timothy Solberg; X Allen Li Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: N Rodríguez de Dios; X Sanz; P Foro; I Membrive; A Reig; A Ortiz; R Jiménez; M Algara Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Cole R Steber; Ryan T Hughes; Michael H Soike; Corbin A Helis; Karina Nieto; Travis Jacobson; Moeko Nagatsuka; Hamilton S McGinnis; C Marc Leyrer; Michael K Farris Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2021-02-27 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: Percy Lee; Billy W Loo; Tithi Biswas; George X Ding; Issam M El Naqa; Andrew Jackson; Feng-Ming Kong; Tamara LaCouture; Moyed Miften; Timothy Solberg; Wolfgang A Tome; An Tai; Ellen Yorke; X Allen Li Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2019-04-05 Impact factor: 8.013