A frontier area in the development of activatable (turn-on) fluorescence-based probes is that concerned with rapid and selective stimulus triggering of probe activation so as to allow for biomarker identification and cellular imaging. The work here is concerned with a cloaked fluorophore composed of a reporter whose fluorescence is efficiently quenched by it being bound to an activatable trigger group through a novel self-immolative linker. Highly selective and rapid activation of the trigger group is achieved by chemical and enzymatic means that result in activated trigger group detachment from the self-immolative linker, with the latter subsequently cleaved from the reporter autonomously, thereby unmasking intense, red-shifted fluorescence emission. To achieve this success, we used a trimethyl-locked quinone propionic acid trigger group and an N-methyl-p-aminobenzyl alcohol self-immolative linker attached to the reporter. Delineated here are the synthesis and characterization of this cloaked fluorophore and the evaluation of its triggered turning on in the presence of an up-regulated enzyme in human cancer cells, NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase-1 (NQO1, DT-diaphorase, EC 1.6.99.2).
A frontier area in the development of activatable (turn-on) fluorescence-based probes is that concerned with rapid and selective stimulus triggering of probe activation so as to allow for biomarker identification and cellular imaging. The work here is concerned with a cloaked fluorophore composed of a reporter whose fluorescence is efficiently quenched by it being bound to an activatable trigger group through a novel self-immolative linker. Highly selective and rapid activation of the trigger group is achieved by chemical and enzymatic means that result in activated trigger group detachment from the self-immolative linker, with the latter subsequently cleaved from the reporter autonomously, thereby unmasking intense, red-shifted fluorescence emission. To achieve this success, we used a trimethyl-locked quinone propionic acid trigger group and an N-methyl-p-aminobenzyl alcohol self-immolative linker attached to the reporter. Delineated here are the synthesis and characterization of this cloaked fluorophore and the evaluation of its triggered turning on in the presence of an up-regulated enzyme in human cancer cells, NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase-1 (NQO1, DT-diaphorase, EC 1.6.99.2).
The success of the ever-growing
field of in vivo and ex vivo fluorescence imaging of diseased cells
for diagnosis, pathology, and treatment applications rests upon the
existence of disease-specific molecules whose spectroscopic signal
is readily differentiated from that of the background of surrounding
normal cells.[1] Molecular probes whose cloaked
fluorescence reporter signal is turned on by endogenous enzymes offer
distinct advantages over always-on reporters, in particular, higher
signal-to-background (positive-to-negative) values.[2] Critical for cancer imaging is the development of libraries
of turn-on probes that will allow for the collection of real-time
information on the diseased tissue cell microenvironment and the high-fidelity
definition of diseased and healthy tissue borders during fluorescence-assisted
surgical resections.[3−5]Unfortunately, the number of pro-fluorogenic
probes that can have
their fluorescence output selectively and quickly revealed by the
presence of cancer-associated enzyme is extremely small, as is the
type of disease-associated activating enzyme. Also, routes to improving
the positive-to-negative value are limited. There are three extant
probes that passively target cancer cells and rapidly (<30 min)
identify the diseased cells by reporter fluorescence that is initiated
by intracellular enzyme action; only three distinct cancer-linked
enzymes have been targeted to date.[5−7] Enzyme-initiated dequenching
of probe fluorescence has been used to improve the signal-to-background
value of the resulting reporter in diseased (positive) cells in comparison
to that of unactivated probe or unaffected (negative) cells. Probe
fluorescence is quenched via fluorescence resonance energy transfer
(FRET) or photoinduced electron-transfer (PeT) mechanisms, and reporter
fluorescence comes about by enzyme-initiated disassociation of the
FRET quencher/donor pair upon enzyme binding[7] or cleavage of the quencher (trigger group) from the probe.[5,6] However, modest signal-to-background (SBR)/positive-to-negative
(PNR) or tumor-to-background (TBR) ratios have been reported.[5,6]Ideal probe characteristics include rapid cell uptake and
highly
selective activation to yield the reporter, low fluorescence efficiency
(Φprobe) of the unactivated probe but high fluorescence
efficiency of the reporter (Φreport), and high-quality
retention of the reporter inside the diseased cells. Furthermore,
the probe–reporter pair will exhibit large differences in energies
of absorption maxima (λabsprobe vs λabsreport) and emission maxima (λemisprobe vs λemisreport), so significantly
enhanced PNR/TBR values arise from the low absorptivity of the probe
at the reporter’s maximum excitation wavelength.A highly
promising approach that incorporates many of the above
desired probe/reporter qualities is one wherein the probe is tripartite,
being composed of a self-immolative linker[8] between the enzyme substrate/trigger group and the reporter moiety
in the fluorescently silent probe. As a result of enzyme activation,
the trigger group is first removed, and then the self-immolative linker
is autonomously eliminated to yield the now highly fluorescent reporter.
It is anticipated that by the careful selection of linker characteristics,
the optical properties of the probe can be made distinct from those
of the reporter, and the linker can be quickly cleaved from the reporter
subsequent to trigger group activation.To that end, we developed probe 1,[9] consisting of a trimethyl-locked quinone propionic
acid
(Q3PA) trigger group[10] linked
to a fluorescently masked naphthalimide (reporter 2)
by N-methyl-p-aminobenzyl alcohol,
NMPABA. The Q3PA trigger group was selected due to its
known rapid and highly selective reduction[10] by NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase-1 (NQO1),[11,12] an enzyme intimately associated with cancer[13] and overexpressed 2- to 50-fold in the cytosol of numerous human
tumor cells (e.g., colon, breast, pancreas, and nonsmall cell lung).[11] The previously unreported NQO1-selective, turn-on
fluorescence probe 1 relies on tuning the push–pull
internal charge transfer (ICT)[14] of the
naphthalimide scaffold via its attachment to the self-immolative NMPABA
linker using an electron-withdrawing carbamate connection. We show
here that upon initiation of trigger group removal from the tripartite
probe, subsequent rapid cleavage of linker occurs so as to afford
reporter 2, which has distinct spectral properties such
that NQO1-positive cancer cells can be imaged and identified with
a positive-to-negative ratio of ∼500:1.Absorbance and emission
spectra of 2 μM probe 1 and reporter 2 in pH 7.40, 0.1 M phosphate buffer. T = 25 °C.As seen in Figure 1, the spectroscopic properties
of probe 1 and reporter 2 in buffered aqueous
media are strikingly different, and these differences are attributed
to the presence of the quinone propionic acid trigger group (Q3PA), as well as the carbamate connection between the N-methyl-p-aminobenzyl alcohol, NMPABA,
linker, and the naphthalimide fluorophore. The λabsreport is red
shifted roughly 50 nm in comparison to λabsprobe (432 nm vs 380 nm), as
is λemisreport vs λemisprobe (532 nm vs 480 nm), with both observations being in accord with
the presence of the electron-deficient carbamate[14] in probe 1. Interestingly, the absorptivity
of probe 1 at the maximum absorption wavelength of reporter 2 is ∼5 times lower than that for reporter 2. The Φprobe value of 0.002, which is 95 times less
than Φreport = 0.19,[9] is
due to photoinduced electron transfer (PeT)[15] quenching of the naphthalimide reporter by the Q3PA group.
This conclusion is supported by outcomes based on voltammetric and
spectroscopic data for probe 1, reporter 2, and Q3PA;[9] the free energy
of the PeT process is −0.98 eV, indicating ready electron transfer
from the excited naphthalimide to the electron-poor Q3PA
group of probe 1. In comparison to the previously reported
probe Q3NI,[5] there is a 3-fold-larger
change in fluorescence efficiency for probe 1 upon NQO1
action to yield the corresponding reporter (Φreport/Φprobe), and the fluorescence energy range of reporter 2 is more attractive for possible imaging applications.
Figure 1
Absorbance and emission
spectra of 2 μM probe 1 and reporter 2 in pH 7.40, 0.1 M phosphate buffer. T = 25 °C.
We next wanted to demonstrate rapid turning on of reporter 2 by the self-immolative cleavage of the NMPABA linker subsequent
to the reduction of probe 1. Dithionite reduction of
the Q3PA moiety is complete within 1 s, and the half-life
of the lactonization reaction is less than 2 min.[16] Thus, sodium dithionite was added to aqueous solutions
of probe 1, and the resulting fluorescence from reporter 2 was used to determine the extent of probe 1 conversion to reporter 2 (Figure 2). Reporter 2 is quickly turned on (t1/2 ∼6 min) under physiologically relevant conditions,
pointing to the rapid self-immolative cleavage of the N-methyl-p-aminobenzyl alcohol and CO2 loss[8] to yield reporter 2; this occurs because of the electron-rich character of the N-methyl-p-aminobenzyl alcohol vs that
of the more typically encountered p-aminobenzyl alcohol
linker.[8,17] Conversion was confirmed by mass spectrometry
analysis of probe 1 solutions treated with dithionite.[9] On the basis of the relatively short time for
the turn-on process, the use of probe 1 should allow
for detecting the presence of NQO1 enzyme activity.
Figure 2
Reduction-stimulated
turning on of reporter 2. Time-course
fluorescence (λex = 432 nm, λemis = 540 nm) from 10 μM probe 1 (pH 7.40, 0.1 M
phosphate buffer) after reduction by 16 μM sodium dithionite.
The inset contains time-dependent spectra of 2 μM probe 1 upon reduction. T = 25 °C.
Reduction-stimulated
turning on of reporter 2. Time-course
fluorescence (λex = 432 nm, λemis = 540 nm) from 10 μM probe 1 (pH 7.40, 0.1 M
phosphate buffer) after reduction by 16 μM sodium dithionite.
The inset contains time-dependent spectra of 2 μM probe 1 upon reduction. T = 25 °C.Kinetics of human NQO1 (40 μg) with probe 1 (2–60
μM) in pH 7.4, 0.1 M phosphate buffer. Values (n = 3) are the average ±1 sample standard deviation. The curve
is the best fit to the average data. T = 25 °C.To evaluate the ability of human
NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase-1
(hNQO1) to initiate the decloaking of probe 1 and reveal
free reporter 2 upon Q3PA trigger group activation,
we utilized the fluorescent product formation technique.[18] Under in vitro conditions, solutions of probe 1 (2–60 μM) incubated with hNQO1 (40 μg)
and its cofactor NADH (100 μM) exhibited steady increases in
fluorescence, suggesting a relatively fast rate of reporter 2 production; control experiments with NADH alone did not
yield significant changes in fluorescence, a result in accord with
that previously shown for the Q3PA trigger group.[10] In addition, the Q3PA trigger group
is stable to reduction/addition reactions in the presence of glutathione
and ascorbate as well as dithiothreitol.[5] Furthermore, hNQO2 plus its cofactor[13] is ineffective at releasing reporter 2. From the hNQO1
enzyme experiments, the initial rate of reporter 2 formation, V (μmol min–1 mg hNQO1–1), was calculated and then plotted as a function of probe 1 concentration (Figure 3). Apparent kinetic
parameters were obtained by fitting the data in Figure 3 to Michaelis–Menten kinetics,[19] namely, the Michaelis constant (Km)
= 10.4 ± 1.0 μM, maximum velocity (Vmax) = 0.00225 ± 0.00008 μmol min–1 mg hNQO1–1, catalytic constant (kcat) = 0.068 ± 0.002 min–1, and
catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) = 6.52 ± 0.67 × 103 M–1 min–1. Also, there is no apparent inhibition of
hNQO1 activity with the [probe 1] values studied. Thus,
substantial reporter 2 release occurs upon probe 1 interaction with hNQO1 under physiologically relevant conditions.
Figure 3
Kinetics of human NQO1 (40 μg) with probe 1 (2–60
μM) in pH 7.4, 0.1 M phosphate buffer. Values (n = 3) are the average ±1 sample standard deviation. The curve
is the best fit to the average data. T = 25 °C.
Microscopy
images of hNQO1-positive HT29 colon (A, B, C) and hNQO1-negative
H596 lung (D, E, F) cancer cells after incubation at 37 °C with
20 μM probe 1. Confocal images in A, B, D, and
E; differential interference contrast in C and F. DRAQ5 nuclear stain
was used for B and E. Scale bar = 20 μm.To investigate the possibility of differentiating types of
cancer
cells based on hNQO1 content (positive vs negative), we exposed live
hNQO1-positive and hNQO1-negative cells to probe 1 under
typical culture conditions (37 °C/CO2 atmosphere).
Confocal fluorescence microscopy images of hNQO1-positive colorectal
cancer cells (HT29) incubated with probe 1 indicated
significant probe 1 uptake and activation, resulting
in intense intracellular reporter 2 production. However,
hNQO1-negative nonsmall cell lung cancer cells (H596) treated with
probe 1 revealed minimal signal (Figure 4), pointing to the intracellular stability of probe 1 in NQO1-negative cells, similar to what we have observed
for another amide-linked napthalimide reporter, Q3NI.[5] Wide-field fluorescence micrographs yielded similar
results. Upon statistical evaluation of the fluorescence intensities
in confocal images of hNQO1-positive (35 samples) and hNQO1-negative
(29 samples) cells like those in Figure 4,
a value of 11 was found for the positive-to-negative ratio (PNR).[9] Similarly, for wide-field fluorescence images
(33 positive samples/20 negative samples), a PNR of 510 was observed.[9] As a direct point for comparison, a PNR of 23
was obtained for the Q3NI probe using the same HT29(NQO1-positive)/H596(NQO1-negative)
cells during wide-field microscopy imaging experiments.[5] Thus, the PNR value of ∼500 obtained with
probe 1/reporter 2 is unprecedented in the
context of our previous work with identical cell lines, and this value
can be improved in wide-field measurements by the use of a filter
set (BCECF) that more completely encompasses the emission profile
of reporter 2. It is clear that the outcomes discussed
here come about from the exceedingly large difference in fluorescence
efficiency of reporter 2 vs probe 1 (95-fold
increase) that results from the hNQO1-initiated removal of the trigger
group quencher and self-immolative linker, the very high fluorescence
efficiency of reporter 2, the significantly energy-shifted
absorption maxima, and the correspondingly lower molar absorptivity
of probe 1 vs reporter 2 at the excitation
maximum of reporter 2. Also, the energies over which
probe 1/reporter 2 is excited/emits light
are shifted to the red by roughly 100 nm when compared to those of
the previously documented Q3NI probe,[5] leading to a significantly decreased background (negative)
signal.
Figure 4
Microscopy
images of hNQO1-positive HT29 colon (A, B, C) and hNQO1-negative
H596 lung (D, E, F) cancer cells after incubation at 37 °C with
20 μM probe 1. Confocal images in A, B, D, and
E; differential interference contrast in C and F. DRAQ5 nuclear stain
was used for B and E. Scale bar = 20 μm.
In summary, we have presented the synthesis, properties,
and biological
evaluation of a novel turn-on fluorescent probe for the cancer-linked
enzyme NQO1. The discrimination of human cells possessing NQO1, from
those that do not, is achieved in a highly selective fashion, which
results from the dramatically increased fluorescence efficiency of
the red-shifted reporter 2 that is generated only upon
hNQO1 action on the trigger group of probe 1. We are
now using the ICT-tunable probe 1 and its variants to
develop methods, including multiphoton imaging routes,[5] that allow for the identification of hard-to-detect NQO1-expressing
cancerous tissues, as well as the diversification of disease targets[20,21] for the activation of new trigger groups. With regard to longer-term
impacts, enzyme-activatable probes will play important roles as “intelligent”
imaging agents applied to the fluorescence-assisted resection of cancerous
tissues[22] and efficacy studies of personalized
chemotherapy.[23]
Authors: William C Silvers; Bijeta Prasai; David H Burk; Matthew L Brown; Robin L McCarley Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-12-27 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Martijn Verdoes; Kristina Oresic Bender; Ehud Segal; Wouter A van der Linden; Salahuddin Syed; Nimali P Withana; Laura E Sanman; Matthew Bogyo Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Quyen T Nguyen; Emilia S Olson; Todd A Aguilera; Tao Jiang; Miriam Scadeng; Lesley G Ellies; Roger Y Tsien Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-02-16 Impact factor: 11.205