Literature DB >> 24813414

Determinants of antipsychotic response in schizophrenia: implications for practice and future clinical trials.

Jonathan Rabinowitz1, Nomi Werbeloff, Ivo Caers, Francine S Mandel, Virginia Stauffer, François Ménard, Bruce J Kinon, Shitij Kapur.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Response to antipsychotics in schizophrenia is highly variable, and determinants are not well understood or used to design clinical trials.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to understand determinants of response to antipsychotic treatment.
METHOD: Supported by the Innovative Medicines Initiative, as part of a large public-private collaboration (NEWMEDS), we assembled the largest dataset of individual patient level information from randomized placebo-controlled trials of second-generation antipsychotics conducted in adult schizophrenia patients by 5 large pharmaceutical companies. The dataset included all placebo-controlled trials of risperidone, paliperidone, ziprasidone, sertindole, olanzapine, and quetiapine. We examined patient and trial-design-related determinants of outcome as measured by change on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale in 29 placebo-controlled trials (drug, n =6,971; placebo, n = 2,200) and initial findings confirmed in additional data from 5 separate trials (drug, n =1,699; placebo, n = 580).
RESULTS: While it is conventional for trials to be 6 weeks long, drug-placebo differences were observable at week 4 with nearly the same sensitivity, and dropout rates were lower. Having any of these attributes was associated with significantly greater drug versus placebo differences in symptom improvement and rates of study completion: being female (P ≤ .04), being a young adult patient who is a few years beyond the first episode (P ≤ .03), having prominent positive and negative symptoms (P ≤ .03), and living in Eastern Europe versus North America (P ≤ .04). Contrary to prevalent clinical opinion, age at onset and use of benzodiazepines did not show a differential treatment response, and patients just above PANSS inclusion threshold were not overrepresented.
CONCLUSIONS: Proof-of-concept trials can be shorter and efficiency improved by including an even distribution of sexes and of patients with prominent symptomatology, thus reducing patient exposure to placebo and experimental treatments. © Copyright 2014 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24813414     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.13m08853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  18 in total

1.  Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of F17464, a preferential D3 antagonist, in the treatment of acute exacerbation of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Istvan Bitter; Jeffrey A Lieberman; Florence Gaudoux; Pierre Sokoloff; Mélanie Groc; Rajeev Chavda; Cécile Delsol; Laurence Barthe; Valérie Brunner; Carine Fabre; Marine Fagard; Agnès Montagne; Françoise Tonner
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Possibly no baseline severity effect for antidepressants versus placebo but for antipsychotics. Why?

Authors:  Stefan Leucht; S Z Levine; M Samara; A Cipriani; J M Davis; T A Furukawa
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  Are Randomized Controlled Trials on Pharmacotherapy and Psychotherapy for Positive Symptoms of Schizophrenia Comparable? A Systematic Review of Patient and Study Characteristics.

Authors:  Irene Bighelli; Claudia Leucht; Maximilian Huhn; Cornelia Reitmeir; Felicitas Schwermann; Sofia Wallis; John M Davis; Stefan Leucht
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  A pharmacodynamic modelling and simulation study identifying gender differences of daily olanzapine dose and dopamine D2-receptor occupancy.

Authors:  Andy R Eugene; Jolanta Masiak
Journal:  Nord J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.202

5.  Consistency checks to improve measurement with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).

Authors:  Jonathan Rabinowitz; Nina R Schooler; Ariana Anderson; Lindsay Ayearst; David Daniel; Michael Davidson; Anzalee Khan; Bruce Kinon; Francois Menard; Lewis Opler; Mark Opler; Joanne B Severe; David Williamson; Christian Yavorsky; Jun Zhao
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  How Many Patients With Schizophrenia Do Not Respond to Antipsychotic Drugs in the Short Term? An Analysis Based on Individual Patient Data From Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Myrto T Samara; Adriani Nikolakopoulou; Georgia Salanti; Stefan Leucht
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  The GRM7 gene, early response to risperidone, and schizophrenia: a genome-wide association study and a confirmatory pharmacogenetic analysis.

Authors:  E Sacchetti; C Magri; A Minelli; P Valsecchi; M Traversa; S Calza; A Vita; M Gennarelli
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.550

8.  Disconnection of drug-response and placebo-response in acute-phase antipsychotic drug trials on schizophrenia? Meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Leucht; Anna Chaimani; Dimitris Mavridis; Claudia Leucht; Maximilian Huhn; Bartosz Helfer; Myrto Samara; Andrea Cipriani; John R Geddes; John M Davis
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 9.  Does Gender Influence Outcome in Schizophrenia?

Authors:  Mary V Seeman
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2019-03

Review 10.  The acute efficacy of antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a review of recent meta-analyses.

Authors:  Peter M Haddad; Christoph U Correll
Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.