Di Liu1, Wei Sun2, Yaowu Yuan3, Ning Zhang4, Alice Hayward5, Yongliang Liu1, Ying Wang6. 1. Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China. 2. Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Beijing 100700, China Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China. 3. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA. 4. Department of Biology, the Huck Institute of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. 5. Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China. 6. Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China yingwang@wbgcas.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The OVATE gene encodes a nuclear-localized regulatory protein belonging to a distinct family of plant-specific proteins known as the OVATE family proteins (OFPs). OVATE was first identified as a key regulator of fruit shape in tomato, with nonsense mutants displaying pear-shaped fruits. However, the role of OFPs in plant development has been poorly characterized. METHODS: Public databases were searched and a total of 265 putative OVATE protein sequences were identified from 13 sequenced plant genomes that represent the major evolutionary lineages of land plants. A phylogenetic analysis was conducted based on the alignment of the conserved OVATE domain from these 13 selected plant genomes. The expression patterns of tomato SlOFP genes were analysed via quantitative real-time PCR. The pattern of OVATE gene duplication resulting in the expansion of the gene family was determined in arabidopsis, rice and tomato. KEY RESULTS: Genes for OFPs were found to be present in all the sampled land plant genomes, including the early-diverged lineages, mosses and lycophytes. Phylogenetic analysis based on the amino acid sequences of the conserved OVATE domain defined 11 sub-groups of OFPs in angiosperms. Different evolutionary mechanisms are proposed for OVATE family evolution, namely conserved evolution and divergent expansion. Characterization of the AtOFP family in arabidopsis, the OsOFP family in rice and the SlOFP family in tomato provided further details regarding the evolutionary framework and revealed a major contribution of tandem and segmental duplications towards expansion of the OVATE gene family. CONCLUSIONS: This first genome-wide survey on OFPs provides new insights into the evolution of the OVATE protein family and establishes a solid base for future functional genomics studies on this important but poorly characterized regulatory protein family in plants.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The OVATE gene encodes a nuclear-localized regulatory protein belonging to a distinct family of plant-specific proteins known as the OVATE family proteins (OFPs). OVATE was first identified as a key regulator of fruit shape in tomato, with nonsense mutants displaying pear-shaped fruits. However, the role of OFPs in plant development has been poorly characterized. METHODS: Public databases were searched and a total of 265 putative OVATE protein sequences were identified from 13 sequenced plant genomes that represent the major evolutionary lineages of land plants. A phylogenetic analysis was conducted based on the alignment of the conserved OVATE domain from these 13 selected plant genomes. The expression patterns of tomato SlOFP genes were analysed via quantitative real-time PCR. The pattern of OVATE gene duplication resulting in the expansion of the gene family was determined in arabidopsis, rice and tomato. KEY RESULTS: Genes for OFPs were found to be present in all the sampled land plant genomes, including the early-diverged lineages, mosses and lycophytes. Phylogenetic analysis based on the amino acid sequences of the conserved OVATE domain defined 11 sub-groups of OFPs in angiosperms. Different evolutionary mechanisms are proposed for OVATE family evolution, namely conserved evolution and divergent expansion. Characterization of the AtOFP family in arabidopsis, the OsOFP family in rice and the SlOFP family in tomato provided further details regarding the evolutionary framework and revealed a major contribution of tandem and segmental duplications towards expansion of the OVATE gene family. CONCLUSIONS: This first genome-wide survey on OFPs provides new insights into the evolution of the OVATE protein family and establishes a solid base for future functional genomics studies on this important but poorly characterized regulatory protein family in plants.
Authors: G A Tuskan; S Difazio; S Jansson; J Bohlmann; I Grigoriev; U Hellsten; N Putnam; S Ralph; S Rombauts; A Salamov; J Schein; L Sterck; A Aerts; R R Bhalerao; R P Bhalerao; D Blaudez; W Boerjan; A Brun; A Brunner; V Busov; M Campbell; J Carlson; M Chalot; J Chapman; G-L Chen; D Cooper; P M Coutinho; J Couturier; S Covert; Q Cronk; R Cunningham; J Davis; S Degroeve; A Déjardin; C Depamphilis; J Detter; B Dirks; I Dubchak; S Duplessis; J Ehlting; B Ellis; K Gendler; D Goodstein; M Gribskov; J Grimwood; A Groover; L Gunter; B Hamberger; B Heinze; Y Helariutta; B Henrissat; D Holligan; R Holt; W Huang; N Islam-Faridi; S Jones; M Jones-Rhoades; R Jorgensen; C Joshi; J Kangasjärvi; J Karlsson; C Kelleher; R Kirkpatrick; M Kirst; A Kohler; U Kalluri; F Larimer; J Leebens-Mack; J-C Leplé; P Locascio; Y Lou; S Lucas; F Martin; B Montanini; C Napoli; D R Nelson; C Nelson; K Nieminen; O Nilsson; V Pereda; G Peter; R Philippe; G Pilate; A Poliakov; J Razumovskaya; P Richardson; C Rinaldi; K Ritland; P Rouzé; D Ryaboy; J Schmutz; J Schrader; B Segerman; H Shin; A Siddiqui; F Sterky; A Terry; C-J Tsai; E Uberbacher; P Unneberg; J Vahala; K Wall; S Wessler; G Yang; T Yin; C Douglas; M Marra; G Sandberg; Y Van de Peer; D Rokhsar Journal: Science Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jana Hackbusch; Klaus Richter; Judith Müller; Francesco Salamini; Joachim F Uhrig Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-03-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Aaron T Hamilton; Stuart Huntley; Mary Tran-Gyamfi; Daniel M Baggott; Laurie Gordon; Lisa Stubbs Journal: Genome Res Date: 2006-04-10 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Shan Wu; Biyao Zhang; Neda Keyhaninejad; Gustavo R Rodríguez; Hyun Jung Kim; Manohar Chakrabarti; Eudald Illa-Berenguer; Nathan K Taitano; M J Gonzalo; Aurora Díaz; Yupeng Pan; Courtney P Leisner; Dennis Halterman; C Robin Buell; Yiqun Weng; Shelley H Jansky; Herman van Eck; Johan Willemsen; Antonio J Monforte; Tea Meulia; Esther van der Knaap Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 14.919