Literature DB >> 24812040

Endophytic bacteria in plant tissue culture: differences between easy- and difficult-to-propagate Prunus avium genotypes.

Mona Quambusch1, Anna Maria Pirttilä2, Mysore V Tejesvi2, Traud Winkelmann3, Melanie Bartsch3.   

Abstract

The endophytic bacterial communities of six Prunus avium L. genotypes differing in their growth patterns during in vitro propagation were identified by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Five morphologically distinct isolates from tissue culture material were identified by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. To detect and analyze the uncultivable fraction of endophytic bacteria, a clone library was established from the amplified 16S rDNA of total plant extract. Bacterial diversity within the clone libraries was analyzed by amplified ribosomal rDNA restriction analysis and by sequencing a clone for each identified operational taxonomic unit. The most abundant bacterial group was Mycobacterium sp., which was identified in the clone libraries of all analyzed Prunus genotypes. Other dominant bacterial genera identified in the easy-to-propagate genotypes were Rhodopseudomonas sp. and Microbacterium sp. Thus, the community structures in the easy- and difficult-to-propagate cherry genotypes differed significantly. The bacterial genera, which were previously reported to have plant growth-promoting effects, were detected only in genotypes with high propagation success, indicating a possible positive impact of these bacteria on in vitro propagation of P. avium, which was proven in an inoculation experiment.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rDNA sequencing; amplified ribosomal rDNA restriction analysis; bacterial endophytes; in vitro culture; plant growth-promoting bacteria

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24812040     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpu027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  15 in total

1.  Endophytic bacterial communities associated with two explant sources of Eucalyptus benthamii Maiden & Cambage.

Authors:  Natalia Pimentel Esposito-Polesi; Pedro Avelino Maia de Andrade; Cristina Vieira de Almeida; Fernando Dini Andreote; Marcílio de Almeida
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Metagenomics of two gnotobiotically grown aromatic rice cultivars reveals genotype-dependent and tissue-specific colonization of endophytic bacterial communities attributing multiple plant growth promoting traits.

Authors:  Anagha Krishnamoorthy; Abhishek Gupta; Pinaki Sar; Mrinal K Maiti
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  Using plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) to improve plant development under in vitro culture conditions.

Authors:  Daniel Cantabella; Ramon Dolcet-Sanjuan; Neus Teixidó
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  Use of Plant Preservative Mixture™ for establishing in vitro cultures from field plants: Experience with papaya reveals several PPM™ tolerant endophytic bacteria.

Authors:  Pious Thomas; Mukta Agrawal; C B Bharathkumar
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.570

5.  High taxonomic diversity of cultivation-recalcitrant endophytic bacteria in grapevine field shoots, their in vitro introduction, and unsuspected persistence.

Authors:  Pious Thomas; Aparna C Sekhar; Sadiq Pasha Shaik
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 6.  The Hidden World within Plants: Ecological and Evolutionary Considerations for Defining Functioning of Microbial Endophytes.

Authors:  Pablo R Hardoim; Leonard S van Overbeek; Gabriele Berg; Anna Maria Pirttilä; Stéphane Compant; Andrea Campisano; Matthias Döring; Angela Sessitsch
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 11.056

7.  Rhizosphere microorganisms enhance in vitro root and plantlet development of Pyrus and Prunus rootstocks.

Authors:  Daniel Cantabella; Neus Teixidó; Guillem Segarra; Rosario Torres; Maria Casanovas; Ramon Dolcet-Sanjuan
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 4.116

8.  Seasonal variation of bacterial endophytes in urban trees.

Authors:  Shu Yi Shen; Roberta Fulthorpe
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  The intracellular Scots pine shoot symbiont Methylobacterium extorquens DSM13060 aggregates around the host nucleus and encodes eukaryote-like proteins.

Authors:  Janne J Koskimäki; Anna Maria Pirttilä; Emmi-Leena Ihantola; Outi Halonen; A Carolin Frank
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 7.867

10.  Commentary: Agroforestry leads to shifts within the gammaproteobacterial microbiome of banana plants cultivated in Central America.

Authors:  Anna Maria Pirttilä
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.