Literature DB >> 28699116

High taxonomic diversity of cultivation-recalcitrant endophytic bacteria in grapevine field shoots, their in vitro introduction, and unsuspected persistence.

Pious Thomas1, Aparna C Sekhar2, Sadiq Pasha Shaik2.   

Abstract

MAIN
CONCLUSION: Molecular and microscopic analyses reveal enormous non-cultivable endophytic bacteria in grapevine field shoots with functional significance. Diverse bacteria enter tissue cultures through surface-sterilized tissues and survive surreptitiously with varying taxonomic realignments. The study was envisaged to assess the extent of endophytic bacterial association with field shoot tissues of grapevine and the likelihood of introduction of such internally colonizing bacteria in vitro adopting molecular techniques targeting the non-cultivable bacterial community. PowerFood®-kit derived DNA from surface-sterilized field shoot tips of grapevine Flame Seedless was employed in a preliminary bacterial class-specific PCR screening proving positive for major prokaryotic taxa including Archaea. Taxonomic and functional diversity were analyzed through whole metagenome profiling (WMG) which revealed predominantly phylum Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and minor shares of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Deinococcus-Thermus with varying functional roles ascribable to the whole bacterial community. Field shoot tip tissues and callus derived from stem segments were further employed in 16S rRNA V3-V4 amplicon taxonomic profiling. This revealed elevated taxonomic diversity in field shoots over WMG, predominantly Proteobacteria succeeded by Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and 15 other phyla including several candidate phyla (135 families, 179 genera). Callus stocks also displayed broad bacterial diversity (16 phyla; 96 families; 141 genera) bearing resemblance to field tissues with Proteobacterial dominance but a reduction in its share, enrichment of Actinobacteria and Firmicutes, disappearance of some field-associated phyla and detection of a few additional taxonomic groups over field community. Similar results were documented during 16S V3-V4 amplicon taxonomic profiling on Thompson Seedless field shoot tip and callus tissues. Video microscopy on tissue homogenates corroborated enormous endophytic bacteria. This study elucidates a vast diversity of cultivation-recalcitrant endophytic bacteria prevailing in grapevine field shoots, their in vitro introduction, and unsuspecting sustenance with possible silent participation in tissue culture processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endophytic bacterial community; Metagenomics; Non-cultivable bacteria; Plant microbe interactions; Plant tissue culture; Video microscopy; Vitis vinifera L.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28699116     DOI: 10.1007/s00425-017-2733-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  45 in total

1.  Analysis of actinomycete communities by specific amplification of genes encoding 16S rRNA and gel-electrophoretic separation in denaturing gradients.

Authors:  H Heuer; M Krsek; P Baker; K Smalla; E M Wellington
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Physical impaction injury effects on bacterial cells during spread plating influenced by cell characteristics of the organisms.

Authors:  P Thomas; M M Mujawar; A C Sekhar; R Upreti
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.772

3.  Investigation of Endophytic Bacterial Community in Supposedly Axenic Cultures of Pineapple and Orchids with Evidence on Abundant Intracellular Bacteria.

Authors:  Natalia Pimentel Esposito-Polesi; Monita Fiori de Abreu-Tarazi; Cristina Vieira de Almeida; Siu Mui Tsai; Marcílio de Almeida
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Ubiquitous presence of fastidious endophytic bacteria in field shoots and index-negative apparently clean shoot-tip cultures of papaya.

Authors:  Pious Thomas; Sima Kumari; Ganiga K Swarna; Devalakere P Prakash; Makki R Dinesh
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 4.570

5.  Endophytic bacteria associated with growing shoot tips of banana (Musa sp.) cv. Grand Naine and the affinity of endophytes to the host.

Authors:  Pious Thomas; Thyvalappil A Soly
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Plant-endophyte interplay protects tomato against a virulent Verticillium.

Authors:  Hakeem O Shittu; Danve C M Castroverde; Ross N Nazar; Jane Robb
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  SEED: efficient clustering of next-generation sequences.

Authors:  Ergude Bao; Tao Jiang; Isgouhi Kaloshian; Thomas Girke
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  The soil microbiome influences grapevine-associated microbiota.

Authors:  Iratxe Zarraonaindia; Sarah M Owens; Pamela Weisenhorn; Kristin West; Jarrad Hampton-Marcell; Simon Lax; Nicholas A Bokulich; David A Mills; Gilles Martin; Safiyh Taghavi; Daniel van der Lelie; Jack A Gilbert
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 7.867

9.  Structure and function of the bacterial root microbiota in wild and domesticated barley.

Authors:  Davide Bulgarelli; Ruben Garrido-Oter; Philipp C Münch; Aaron Weiman; Johannes Dröge; Yao Pan; Alice C McHardy; Paul Schulze-Lefert
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 21.023

10.  Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome.

Authors:  Derek S Lundberg; Sarah L Lebeis; Sur Herrera Paredes; Scott Yourstone; Jase Gehring; Stephanie Malfatti; Julien Tremblay; Anna Engelbrektson; Victor Kunin; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Robert C Edgar; Thilo Eickhorst; Ruth E Ley; Philip Hugenholtz; Susannah Green Tringe; Jeffery L Dangl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  7 in total

1.  Metagenomics of two gnotobiotically grown aromatic rice cultivars reveals genotype-dependent and tissue-specific colonization of endophytic bacterial communities attributing multiple plant growth promoting traits.

Authors:  Anagha Krishnamoorthy; Abhishek Gupta; Pinaki Sar; Mrinal K Maiti
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Use of Plant Preservative Mixture™ for establishing in vitro cultures from field plants: Experience with papaya reveals several PPM™ tolerant endophytic bacteria.

Authors:  Pious Thomas; Mukta Agrawal; C B Bharathkumar
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.570

Review 3.  The Role of the Endophytic Microbiome in the Grapevine Response to Environmental Triggers.

Authors:  Davide Pacifico; Andrea Squartini; Dalila Crucitti; Elisabetta Barizza; Fiorella Lo Schiavo; Rosella Muresu; Francesco Carimi; Michela Zottini
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Intracellular Bacteria in Plants: Elucidation of Abundant and Diverse Cytoplasmic Bacteria in Healthy Plant Cells Using In Vitro Cell and Callus Cultures.

Authors:  Pious Thomas; Christopher M M Franco
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-01-28

5.  Cytobacts: Abundant and Diverse Vertically Seed-Transmitted Cultivation-Recalcitrant Intracellular Bacteria Ubiquitous to Vascular Plants.

Authors:  Pious Thomas; Thekepat P Rajendran; Christopher M M Franco
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  The microbiota of the grapevine holobiont: A key component of plant health.

Authors:  Pauline Bettenfeld; Jasmine Cadena I Canals; Lucile Jacquens; Olivier Fernandez; Florence Fontaine; Evert van Schaik; Pierre-Emmanuel Courty; Sophie Trouvelot
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 12.822

7.  Enduring Effect of Antibiotic Timentin Treatment on Tobacco In Vitro Shoot Growth and Microbiome Diversity.

Authors:  Inga Tamošiūnė; Elena Andriūnaitė; Jurgita Vinskienė; Vidmantas Stanys; Rytis Rugienius; Danas Baniulis
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.