Literature DB >> 24811401

Ecosystem stability in space: α, β and γ variability.

Shaopeng Wang1, Michel Loreau.   

Abstract

The past two decades have seen great progress in understanding the mechanisms of ecosystem stability in local ecological systems. There is, however, an urgent need to extend existing knowledge to larger spatial scales to match the scale of management and conservation. Here, we develop a general theoretical framework to study the stability and variability of ecosystems at multiple scales. Analogously to the partitioning of biodiversity, we propose the concepts of alpha, beta and gamma variability. Gamma variability at regional (metacommunity) scale can be partitioned into local alpha variability and spatial beta variability, either multiplicatively or additively. On average, variability decreases from local to regional scales, which creates a negative variability-area relationship. Our partitioning framework suggests that mechanisms of regional ecosystem stability can be understood by investigating the influence of ecological factors on alpha and beta variability. Diversity can provide insurance effects at the various levels of variability, thus generating alpha, beta and gamma diversity-stability relationships. As a consequence, the loss of biodiversity and habitat impairs ecosystem stability at the regional scale. Overall, our framework enables a synthetic understanding of ecosystem stability at multiple scales and has practical implications for landscape management.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Keywords:  Diversity partitioning; diversity-stability relationship; hierarchical theory; insurance hypothesis; metacommunity; spatial synchrony; species synchrony; variability partitioning; variability-area relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24811401     DOI: 10.1111/ele.12292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  36 in total

1.  An objective view of biological diversity: how history and epistemology shaped current treatment.

Authors:  Anderson A Eduardo; Ricardo Carmo
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 1.919

2.  Spatial heterogeneity contributes more to portfolio effects than species variability in bottom-associated marine fishes.

Authors:  James T Thorson; Mark D Scheuerell; Julian D Olden; Daniel E Schindler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Information use during movement regulates how fragmentation and loss of habitat affect body size.

Authors:  Jasmijn Hillaert; Martijn L Vandegehuchte; Thomas Hovestadt; Dries Bonte
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Rare species contribute disproportionately to the functional structure of species assemblages.

Authors:  Rafael P Leitão; Jansen Zuanon; Sébastien Villéger; Stephen E Williams; Christopher Baraloto; Claire Fortunel; Fernando P Mendonça; David Mouillot
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Biotic homogenization can decrease landscape-scale forest multifunctionality.

Authors:  Fons van der Plas; Pete Manning; Santiago Soliveres; Eric Allan; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Kris Verheyen; Christian Wirth; Miguel A Zavala; Evy Ampoorter; Lander Baeten; Luc Barbaro; Jürgen Bauhus; Raquel Benavides; Adam Benneter; Damien Bonal; Olivier Bouriaud; Helge Bruelheide; Filippo Bussotti; Monique Carnol; Bastien Castagneyrol; Yohan Charbonnier; David Anthony Coomes; Andrea Coppi; Cristina C Bastias; Seid Muhie Dawud; Hans De Wandeler; Timo Domisch; Leena Finér; Arthur Gessler; André Granier; Charlotte Grossiord; Virginie Guyot; Stephan Hättenschwiler; Hervé Jactel; Bogdan Jaroszewicz; François-Xavier Joly; Tommaso Jucker; Julia Koricheva; Harriet Milligan; Sandra Mueller; Bart Muys; Diem Nguyen; Martina Pollastrini; Sophia Ratcliffe; Karsten Raulund-Rasmussen; Federico Selvi; Jan Stenlid; Fernando Valladares; Lars Vesterdal; Dawid Zielínski; Markus Fischer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Biotic stability mechanisms in Inner Mongolian grassland.

Authors:  Yonghui Wang; Xiaxia Niu; Liqing Zhao; Cunzhu Liang; Bailing Miao; Qing Zhang; Jinghui Zhang; Bernhard Schmid; Wenhong Ma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Local species diversity, β-diversity and climate influence the regional stability of bird biomass across North America.

Authors:  Christopher P Catano; Trevor S Fristoe; Joseph A LaManna; Jonathan A Myers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Bacterial Signatures of "Red-Operculum" Disease in the Gut of Crucian Carp (Carassius auratus).

Authors:  Tongtong Li; Huan Li; François-Joël Gatesoupe; Rong She; Qiang Lin; Xuefeng Yan; Jiabao Li; Xiangzhen Li
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Adaptation to Fasting in Crucian Carp (Carassius auratus): Gut Microbiota and Its Correlative Relationship with Immune Function.

Authors:  Tongtong Li; Mengting Qi; François-Joël Gatesoupe; Dongcan Tian; Weihua Jin; Jun Li; Qiang Lin; Shijin Wu; Huan Li
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  The relationship between the spatial scaling of biodiversity and ecosystem stability.

Authors:  Robin Delsol; Michel Loreau; Bart Haegeman
Journal:  Glob Ecol Biogeogr       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 7.144

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.