CONTEXT: The acylated/unacylated ghrelin (AG/UAG) ratio has been reported to range from 0·02 to 0·3, suggesting biologically relevant independent regulation of each ghrelin isoform. However, AG is deacylated to UAG by esterases in blood samples, and esterase inhibition is critical for their accurate measurement. Our hypothesis is that at least part of the variation in reported AG and UAG values is due to inconsistent sample preparation. DESIGN: A non-interventional study. Quantification with two different, commercially available, ELISA formats of AG and UAG in venous plasma stabilized or not with 4-(2-aminoethyl) benzenesulphonyl fluoride (AEBSF) and stored for 0-6 months at -20 or -80 °C. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy, non-obese, adults (n = 8; 4 women), age 26-42 yrs, after an overnight fast. MEASUREMENTS: AG and UAG stability following different methods of sample treatment and storage. RESULTS: Non-AEBSF plasma contained low AG and high UAG (>270 pg/ml) indicating rapid conversion of AG to UAG. However, AEBSF plasma, stored at -80 °C and measured at 0, 1, 3 and 6 months contained AG and UAG ranges of 12-350 and 17-170 pg/ml, respectively. Mean (SEM) AG/UAG ratios were 1·7(0·3), 1·2(0·2), 1·5(0·3) and 1·8(0·5) at each time point with no significant effect of storage period. CONCLUSIONS: AG and UAG levels measured in AEBSF-stabilized plasma indicate that the AG/UAG ratio is markedly higher than previously described and that UAG is a physiological component of the circulation. This highlights the importance of immediately stabilizing blood samples on collection for determination of both AG and UAG concentrations and provides a valuable tool for their measurement in physiological and interventional studies.
CONTEXT: The acylated/unacylated ghrelin (AG/UAG) ratio has been reported to range from 0·02 to 0·3, suggesting biologically relevant independent regulation of each ghrelin isoform. However, AG is deacylated to UAG by esterases in blood samples, and esterase inhibition is critical for their accurate measurement. Our hypothesis is that at least part of the variation in reported AG and UAG values is due to inconsistent sample preparation. DESIGN: A non-interventional study. Quantification with two different, commercially available, ELISA formats of AG and UAG in venous plasma stabilized or not with 4-(2-aminoethyl) benzenesulphonyl fluoride (AEBSF) and stored for 0-6 months at -20 or -80 °C. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy, non-obese, adults (n = 8; 4 women), age 26-42 yrs, after an overnight fast. MEASUREMENTS: AG and UAG stability following different methods of sample treatment and storage. RESULTS: Non-AEBSF plasma contained low AG and high UAG (>270 pg/ml) indicating rapid conversion of AG to UAG. However, AEBSF plasma, stored at -80 °C and measured at 0, 1, 3 and 6 months contained AG and UAG ranges of 12-350 and 17-170 pg/ml, respectively. Mean (SEM) AG/UAG ratios were 1·7(0·3), 1·2(0·2), 1·5(0·3) and 1·8(0·5) at each time point with no significant effect of storage period. CONCLUSIONS: AG and UAG levels measured in AEBSF-stabilized plasma indicate that the AG/UAG ratio is markedly higher than previously described and that UAG is a physiological component of the circulation. This highlights the importance of immediately stabilizing blood samples on collection for determination of both AG and UAG concentrations and provides a valuable tool for their measurement in physiological and interventional studies.
Authors: C Tezenas du Montcel; P Duriez; N Lebrun; D Grouselle; B de Grimaudet; R Dardennes; J Epelbaum; M Cuenca; O Viltart; P Gorwood; V Tolle Journal: Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol Date: 2022-05-20
Authors: Jacob E Moose; Katelyn A Leets; Nilamber A Mate; John D Chisholm; James L Hougland Journal: Expert Opin Ther Pat Date: 2020-06-21 Impact factor: 6.674
Authors: R J Kuppens; G Diène; N E Bakker; C Molinas; S Faye; M Nicolino; D Bernoux; P J D Delhanty; A J van der Lely; S Allas; M Julien; T Delale; M Tauber; A C S Hokken-Koelega Journal: Endocrine Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Jamie Matu; John O'Hara; Neil Hill; Sarah Clarke; Christopher Boos; Caroline Newman; David Holdsworth; Theocharis Ispoglou; Lauren Duckworth; David Woods; Adrian Mellor; Kevin Deighton Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Zhong-Cheng Luo; Jean-François Bilodeau; Anne Monique Nuyt; William D Fraser; Pierre Julien; Francois Audibert; Lin Xiao; Carole Garofalo; Emile Levy Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Roxanne C S van Adrichem; Aart Jan van der Lely; Martin Huisman; Piet Kramer; Richard A Feelders; Patric J D Delhanty; Wouter W de Herder Journal: Endocr Connect Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 3.335