Literature DB >> 24810857

Understanding surgical residents' postoperative practices and barriers and enablers to the implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Guideline.

Ashlie Nadler1, Emily A Pearsall2, J Charles Victor3, Mary-Anne Aarts4, Allan Okrainec5, Robin S McLeod6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: An Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) was developed at the University of Toronto. Before implementation, general surgery residents were surveyed to assess their current stated practices and their perceived barriers and enablers to early discharge.
METHODS: The survey, which consisted of 33 questions related to the postoperative management of patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy (LAC), open colectomy (OC) and open low anterior resection (LAR), was distributed to all residents. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to test differences. Open-ended questions were analyzed using content analysis.
RESULTS: Of 77 residents surveyed, 58 (75%) responded. Residents stated that a fluid diet would be ordered on POD#0 and regular diet on POD#1 by 67.9% and 49.1%, respectively, following LAC, and 50.0% and 25.9%, respectively, following OC. On POD#1, 89.3% expected patients to ambulate following LAC compared with 67.9% following OC. Residents indicated that urinary catheters would be removed on POD#1 by 87% following LAC and by 81.3% following OC, and by POD#3 by 89.1% following LAR. However, in patients with an epidural, approximately 50% of residents stated that they would wait until it was removed. Overall, 76.4% of residents agreed that an ERAS CPG should be adopted. Residents cited setting expectations, encouragement of early ambulation and feeding, and good pain control as enablers to early discharge. However, patient and family expectations, surgeon preferences, and beliefs of the health care team were mentioned as barriers to early discharge.
CONCLUSION: Residents have a reasonable approach to the management of patients who underwent LAC, but there are gaps that exist in their management, especially following OC and LAR. Although most residents agreed with the implementation of an ERAS CPG, barriers exist, and strategies aimed at ensuring adherence with the recommendations are required.
Copyright © 2014 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERAS; Medical Knowledge; Patient Care; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Systems-Based Practice; barriers; clinical practice guidelines; colorectal surgery; enablers

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24810857     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  14 in total

1.  Validity of the I-FEED score for postoperative gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Nourah Alsharqawi; Mohsen Alhashemi; Pepa Kaneva; Gabriele Baldini; Julio F Fiore; Liane S Feldman; Lawrence Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Evidence or eminence in abdominal surgery: recent improvements in perioperative care.

Authors:  Josefin Segelman; Jonas Nygren
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  The Evolution of Surgical Enhanced Recovery Pathways: a Review.

Authors:  Amir Elhassan; Ahmed Ahmed; Hamdy Awad; Michelle Humeidan; Viet Nguyen; Elyse M Cornett; Richard D Urman; Alan David Kaye
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-08-31

Review 4.  Clinical management IT system for enhanced recovery.

Authors:  Eunjue Yi; Sanghoon Jheon
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathways and Resident Physicians: Barrier or Opportunity?

Authors:  Alexander B Stone; Ira L Leeds; Jonathan Efron; Elizabeth C Wick
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Enhanced recovery program for minimally invasive and vaginal urogynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Elisa Rodriguez Trowbridge; Sarah L Evans; Bethany M Sarosiek; Susan C Modesitt; Dana L Redick; Mohamed Tiouririne; Robert H Thiele; Traci L Hedrick; Kathie L Hullfish
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Successful implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme for elective colorectal surgery: a process evaluation of champions' experiences.

Authors:  Lesley Gotlib Conn; Marg McKenzie; Emily A Pearsall; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Randomized trial of subfascial infusion of ropivacaine for early recovery in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Lee; Woo-Seog Sim; Go Eun Kim; Hee Cheol Kim; Joo Hyun Jun; Jin Young Lee; Byung-Seop Shin; Heejin Yoo; Sin-Ho Jung; Joungyoun Kim; Seung Hyeon Lee; Deok Kyu Yo; Yu Ri Na
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-09-28

9.  Facilitators and barriers of change toward an elder-friendly surgical environment: perspectives of clinician stakeholder groups.

Authors:  Heather M Hanson; Lindsey Warkentin; Roxanne Wilson; Navtej Sandhu; Susan E Slaughter; Rachel G Khadaroo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Enhanced recovery simulation in colorectal surgery: design of virtual online patients.

Authors:  Laura Beyer-Berjot; Vishal Patel; Paul Ziprin; Dave Taylor; Stéphane Berdah; Ara Darzi; Rajesh Aggarwal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.