Literature DB >> 24810792

Treatment plan complexity metrics for predicting IMRT pre-treatment quality assurance results.

S B Crowe1, T Kairn, J Kenny, R T Knight, B Hill, C M Langton, J V Trapp.   

Abstract

The planning of IMRT treatments requires a compromise between dose conformity (complexity) and deliverability. This study investigates established and novel treatment complexity metrics for 122 IMRT beams from prostate treatment plans. The Treatment and Dose Assessor software was used to extract the necessary data from exported treatment plan files and calculate the metrics. For most of the metrics, there was strong overlap between the calculated values for plans that passed and failed their quality assurance (QA) tests. However, statistically significant variation between plans that passed and failed QA measurements was found for the established modulation index and for a novel metric describing the proportion of small apertures in each beam. The 'small aperture score' provided threshold values which successfully distinguished deliverable treatment plans from plans that did not pass QA, with a low false negative rate.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24810792     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-014-0274-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 0158-9938            Impact factor:   1.430


  14 in total

Review 1.  Complexity metrics for IMRT and VMAT plans: a review of current literature and applications.

Authors:  Sophie Chiavassa; Igor Bessieres; Magali Edouard; Michel Mathot; Alexandra Moignier
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Treatment plan complexity does not predict IROC Houston anthropomorphic head and neck phantom performance.

Authors:  Mallory C Glenn; Victor Hernandez; Jordi Saez; David S Followill; Rebecca M Howell; Julianne M Pollard-Larkin; Shouhao Zhou; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Validation of in-house knowledge-based planning model for advance-stage lung cancer patients treated using VMAT radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nilesh S Tambe; Isabel M Pires; Craig Moore; Christopher Cawthorne; Andrew W Beavis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Impact of different optimization strategies on the compatibility between planned and delivered doses during radiation therapy of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Agata Jodda; Tomasz Piotrowski; Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska; Julian Malicki
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-04-12

5.  Are simple IMRT beams more robust against MLC error? Exploring the impact of MLC errors on planar quality assurance and plan quality for different complexity beams.

Authors:  Jiazhou Wang; Xiance Jin; Jiayuan Peng; Jiang Xie; Junchao Chen; Weigang Hu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  On the complexity of helical tomotherapy treatment plans.

Authors:  Tania Santos; Tiago Ventura; Josefina Mateus; Miguel Capela; Maria do Carmo Lopes
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Improving accuracy for stereotactic body radiotherapy treatments of spinal metastases.

Authors:  James Rijken; Barry Jordan; Scott Crowe; Tanya Kairn; Jamie Trapp
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Mechanical performance of a commercial knowledge-based VMAT planning for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mikoto Tamura; Hajime Monzen; Kenji Matsumoto; Kazuki Kubo; Masakazu Otsuka; Masahiro Inada; Hiroshi Doi; Kazuki Ishikawa; Kiyoshi Nakamatsu; Iori Sumida; Hirokazu Mizuno; Do-Kun Yoon; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Impact of delivery characteristics on dose delivery accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy for different treatment sites.

Authors:  Jiaqi Li; Xile Zhang; Jun Li; Rongtao Jiang; Jing Sui; Maria F Chan; Ruijie Yang
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Comparison of VMAT complexity-reduction strategies for single-target cranial radiosurgery with the Eclipse treatment planning system.

Authors:  Eric C Lobb; Michael Degnan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.