| Literature DB >> 24809058 |
Kohei Yamamoto1, Kazunari Igawa1, Kouji Sugimoto1, Yuu Yoshizawa1, Kajiro Yanagiguchi1, Takeshi Ikeda1, Shizuka Yamada1, Yoshihiko Hayashi1.
Abstract
Marine collagen derived from fish scales, skin, and bone has been widely investigated for application as a scaffold and carrier due to its bioactive properties, including excellent biocompatibility, low antigenicity, and high biodegradability and cell growth potential. Fish type I collagen is an effective material as a biodegradable scaffold or spacer replicating the natural extracellular matrix, which serves to spatially organize cells, providing them with environmental signals and directing site-specific cellular regulation. This study was conducted to confirm the safety of fish (tilapia) atelocollagen for use in clinical application. We performed in vitro and in vivo biological studies of medical materials to investigate the safety of fish collagen. The extract of fish collagen gel was examined to clarify its sterility. All present sterility tests concerning bacteria and viruses (including endotoxin) yielded negative results, and all evaluations of cell toxicity, sensitization, chromosomal aberrations, intracutaneous reactions, acute systemic toxicity, pyrogenic reactions, and hemolysis were negative according to the criteria of the ISO and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. The present study demonstrated that atelocollagen prepared from tilapia is a promising biomaterial for use as a scaffold in regenerative medicine.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24809058 PMCID: PMC3997882 DOI: 10.1155/2014/630757
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Individual score of the skin reaction on challenge sites.
| Group | Animal no. | Treatment | Grading scale* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induction | Challenge | 24 hr** | 48 hr** | |||
| Intradermal injection | Topical application | |||||
| 2 | 6 | Fish collagen (0.1%) | Fish collagen (0.1%) | Fish collagen (0.1%) | 0 | 0 |
| Water for injection | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 7 | Fish collagen (0.1%) | Fish collagen (0.1%) | Fish collagen (0.1%) | 0 | 0 | |
| Water for injection | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 8 | Fish collagen (0.1%) | Fish collagen (0.1%) | Fish collagen (0.1%) | 0 | 0 | |
| Water for injection | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 9 | Fish collagen (0.1%) | Fish collagen (0.1%) | Fish collagen (0.1%) | 0 | 0 | |
| Water for injection | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 10 | Fish collagen (0.1%) | Fish collagen (0.1%) | Fish collagen (0.1%) | 0 | 0 | |
| Water for injection | 0 | 0 | ||||
Notes: *Grading scale. Patch test reaction:
0: no reaction,
1: discrete or porphyritic erythema,
2: moderately fused erythema,
3: extremely severe erythema and swelling.
**Time (hours) after challenge.
Figure 4The NOS-1 cells maintained a globular shape in the FC gel cultured in the mineralization medium at seven days after seeding. Scale bar = 15 μm.
Figure 5The NOS-1 cells exhibited a grape cluster, consisting of a stratified structure in the FC gel cultured in the mineralization medium at 14 days after seeding. Scale bar = 15 μm.
Figure 6A representative photograph of the extracellular matrix mineralization in the FC gel (A). Note the lack of staining of the extracellular matrix in the control medium (B).
(a)
| Test area | Colonies/well | Mean ± SD | Colony-formation ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control (MEM10 medium) | 38, 43, 42, 40 | 40.8 ± 2.2 | 100 |
| Negative control material | |||
| Plastic sheet, toluene resisting | 36, 40, 41, 41 | 39.5 ± 2.4 | 96.8 |
| Positive control material B | |||
| Polyurethane film containing 0.25% ZDBC | 0, 0, 0, 0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Test article | |||
| Fish collagen | 38, 40, 36, 39 | 38.3 ± 1.7 | 93.9 |
(b)
| Test solution | Concentration ( | Colonies/well | Mean ± SD | Colony-formation ratio (%) | IC50 ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (DMSO) | 0 | 41, 37, 41, 44 | 40.8 ± 2.9 | 100 | — |
|
| |||||
| Positive control article | 1 | 37, 43, 37, 41 | 39.5 ± 3.0 | 96.8 | 1.60 |
| 2 | 5, 11, 6, 6 | 7.0 ± 2.7 | 17.2 | ||
| 3 | 0, 0, 0, 0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
ZDBC: Zinc dibutyldithiocarbamate.
DMSO: Dimethyl sulfoxide.
Irritation score (intracutaneous) in male rabbits.
| Animal no. | Test and control articles* | Total | Total score |
Irritation**score ∑( | Total irritation score | Mean# | Difference of mean## | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Time (hour) after administration | |||||||||
| 24 | 48 | 72 | ||||||||
| 1 | Physiological saline extract of Fish collagen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 1 | Physiological saline extract (control) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
|
| ||||||||||
| 1 | Sesame oil extract of Fish collargen | 0 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 18 | 1.20 | 3.60 | 1.20 | −0.24 |
| 1 | Sesame oil extract (control) | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 1.00 | 4.33 | 1.44 | |
Notes: *Each test and control article was administered to 5 sites per animal.
**Total score [erythema and eschar formation (A) and edema formation (B) of 24, 48, and 72 hours after administration of per animal]/15 [3 grading periods (24, 48, and 72 hours after administration) × 5 administered sites].
#Total irritation score/3 animals.
##Mean (each test article) − Mean (each control article).
Body temperature in male rabbits.
| Test article | Animal no. | Rectal temperature (°C) | Temperature rise (°C) | Total# (°C) | Pyrogenicity | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before administration | Control temperature | After administration | |||||||||||
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | 8th | ||||||
| Physiological saline extract of fish collagen | 1 | 38.8 | 38.7 | 38.75 | 38.9 | 39.1 | 39.2 | 39.2 | 39.2 | 39.2 | 0.45 | 1.15 | − |
| 2 | 39.0 | 39.0 | 39.00 | 39.3 | 39.4 | 39.4 | 39.4 | 39.3 | 39.2 | 0.40 | |||
| 3 | 38.7 | 38.7 | 38.70 | 38.9 | 38.8 | 38.8 | 39.0 | 39.0 | 39.0 | 0.30 | |||
Notes: #The total of the temperature rise.
−: Negative.