Literature DB >> 24808735

A Nudix Hydrolase Protein, Ysa1, Regulates Oxidative Stress Response and Antifungal Drug Susceptibility in Cryptococcus neoformans.

Kyung-Tae Lee1, Hyojeong Kwon1, Dohyun Lee2, Yong-Sun Bahn1.   

Abstract

A nucleoside diphosphate-linked moiety X (Nudix) hydrolase-like gene, YSA1, has been identified as one of the gromwell plant extract-responsive genes in Cryptococcus neoformans. Ysa1 is known to control intracellular concentrations of ADP-ribose or O-acetyl-ADP-ribose, and has diverse biological functions, including the response to oxidative stress in the ascomycete yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In this study, we characterized the role of YSA1 in the stress response and adaptation of the basidiomycete yeast, C. neoformans. We constructed three independent deletion mutants for YSA1, and analyzed their mutant phenotypes. We found that ysa1 mutants did not show increased sensitivity to reactive oxygen species-producing oxidative damage agents, such as hydrogen peroxide and menadione, but exhibited increased sensitivity to diamide, which is a thiol-specific oxidant. Ysa1 was dispensable for the response to most environmental stresses, such as genotoxic, osmotic, and endoplasmic reticulum stress. In conclusion, modulation of YSA1 may regulate the cellular response and adaptation of C. neoformans to certain oxidative stresses and contribute to the evolution of antifungal drug resistance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cryptococcus neoformans; Nudix hydrolase; Oxidative stress; Ysa1

Year:  2014        PMID: 24808735      PMCID: PMC4004948          DOI: 10.5941/MYCO.2014.42.1.52

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mycobiology        ISSN: 1229-8093            Impact factor:   1.858


The nucleoside diphosphate-linked moiety X (Nudix, NDP-X) hydrolase superfamily is ubiquitous in all organisms ranging from bacteria to mammals, and catalyzes degradation of NDP-X to NMP plus P-X [1]. In bacteria and fungi, but not in mammals, the number of Nudix hydrolases is generally proportional to genome size [1]. In the budding yeast model organism, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, six Nudix hydrolases have been discovered and partially characterized [1]: Npy1p is an NAD(P)H/NAD(P)+ hydrolase localized in peroxisomes [2, 3]; Pcd1p is a CoA hydrolase that is also localized in peroxisomes [4]; Ddp1p is a diadenosine hexaphosphate hydrolase, and belongs to the diphosphoinositol polyphosphate phosphohydrolase family [5, 6]; Dcp2p is a Nudix hydrolase, which is the catalytic subunit of the Dcp1-Dcp2 mRNA decapping enzyme complex [7]; Ysa1p is an NDP-sugar hydrolase [8]; and YJR142W is an uncharacterized Nudix hydrolase. Among the S. cerevisiae Nudix hydrolases, Ysa1p catalyzes the enzymatic degradation of ADP-ribose (ADPr) or O-acetyl-ADP-ribose (OAADPr) to AMP and acetylated phosphoribose, and plays a key role in modulating intracellular concentrations of ADPr or OAADPr [9]. ADPr is produced by the enzymatic cleavage of the glycosidic bond of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) by NAD+ glycohydrolases, ADPr transferases, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs), and cyclic ADPr synthases [10, 11]. OAADPr is generated by sirtuins, which catalyze NAD+-dependent lysine deacetylation. Both ADPr and OAADPr are known to act as secondary messengers and play diverse biological roles in yeast and mammals. In S. cerevisiae, ADPr or OAADPr counteract the increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) through the inhibition of complex I of the electron transport chain in mitochondria and re-routing of glucose metabolism from the glycolytic pathway to the pentose phosphate pathway, which generates NADPH to detoxify ROS [9]. Therefore, the deletion of the Nudix hydrolase gene, YSA1, increases intracellular concentrations of ADPr and OAADPr, which result in enhanced cellular resistance to oxidative stress (e.g., H2O2) and ROS-generating copper ions [9]. In a previous study, we performed a global transcriptome analysis of eukaryotic genes affected by gromwell extract by using Cryptococcus neoformans as a eukaryotic model system [12]. Gromwell is a perennial herb, which belongs to the family Boragniaceae, and is known to have a plethora of pharmacological, cosmetic, and nutritional properties [12]. Interestingly, a gene (CNAG_02986) that is highly orthologous to the S. cerevisiae YSA1 gene was found to be downregulated by gromwell extract treatment [12]. Based on this finding, we hypothesized that gromwell extract could potentially decrease expression levels of YSA1, which may contribute to increased intracellular levels of ADPr and OAADPr, and subsequently help cells to resist oxidative stress and efficiently counteract ROS. However, it remains unclear whether Ysa1 plays similar biological roles in other eukaryotes such as C. neoformans. In this study, we characterized the functions of Ysa1 through construction of targeted gene deletion mutants by homologous recombination in C. neoformans and analyzed their phenotypes, providing further insight into the Nudix hydrolase-dependent stress defense mechanism in eukaryotic cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and media

C. neoformans strains listed in Table 1 [13] were cultured and maintained in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) medium or yeast extract-peptone (YP) medium for inducing glucose starvation.
Table 1

Strains used in this study

Construction of the ysa1Δ mutants

YSA1 gene disruption cassettes were generated by using the nourseothricin acetyltransferase (NAT)-split marker-based double joint (DJ) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method as previously described [14, 15] with some modifications. In the first round of PCR, the 3'- and 5'-flanking regions of YSA1 were amplified with primer pairs B5567/B5568, and B5569/B5570, respectively (Fig. 1C). A dominant selection marker was also amplified from a plasmid that contains the NAT gene with the primer pair B1026/B1027. In the second round of PCR, YSA1::NAT disruption cassettes with the 5' or 3' NAT-split markers were amplified by DJ-PCR with primer pairs B5567/B1455 and B1454/B5570, respectively, by combining the first-round PCR products (Fig. 1C). These split cassettes were then introduced into the wild-type H99 strain by biolistic transformation. Stable transformants selected on YPD medium containing 100 µg/mL nourseothricin were screened using diagnostic PCR with the primer pair B5566/B79. Finally, the correct genotypes of positive ysa1Δ mutants (YSB2544, YSB2545, and YSB2546) were verified by Southern blot analysis, using a YSA1-specific probe that was PCR-amplified with the primer pair B5567/B5755. Each primer sequence was described in Table 2.
Fig. 1

Discovery and disruption of a Nudix hydrolase gene, YSA1, in Cryptococcus neoformans. A, Phylogenetic analysis of Nudix hydrolase proteins in fungi. The phylogenetic tree was generated using Phylodendron Phylogenetic Tree Printer software (http://iubio.bio.indiana.edu/treeapp/treeprint-form.html). The scale bar indicates an evolutionary distance of 0.1. Species names are abbreviated as follows: S.kud, Saccharomyces kudriavzevii; S.cer, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; C.gla, Candida glabrata; A.fum, Aspergillus fumigatus; A.cla, Aspergillus clavatus; A.fla, Aspergillus flavus; A.ory, Aspergillus oryzae; A.ter, Aspergillus terreus; A.nig, Aspergillus niger; A.nid, Aspergillus nidulans; N.cra, Neosartorya fischeri; C.ort, Candida orthopsilosis; C.alb, Candida albicans; S.pom, Schizosaccharomyces pombe; C.cin, Coprinopsis cinerea; U.may, Ustilago maydis; C.neo, Cryptococcus neoformans; P.gra, Puccinia graminis; P.tri, Puccinia triticina; P.str, Puccinia striiformis; B, Conserved Nudix hydrolase domains of Ysa1 proteins in fungi and humans. Species names are abbreviated as follows: C.n, C. neoformans; S.c, S. cerevisiae; S.p, S. pombe; S.k, S. kudriavzevii; C.a, C. albicans; H.s, Homo sapiens. C, The YSA1 gene disruption strategy. X; XbaI restriction site; D, Verification of the ysa1Δ mutants. The correct genotypes of the ysa1Δ mutants were verified by Southern blot analysis using genomic DNA digested with the restriction enzyme XbaI and the YSA1-specific probe denoted in panel (C).

Table 2

Primers used in this study

Phenotypic analysis

For antifungal drug sensitivity and stress response tests, wild-type and mutant strains were incubated in YPD medium for 16 hr at 30℃, 10-fold serially diluted (1~104 dilutions) in dH2O, and spotted onto solid YPD medium containing indicated concentrations (Figs. 2, 3, 4) of stress-inducers and antifungal drugs. Stress-inducers included oxidizing agents (hydrogen peroxide, tert-butyl hydroperoxide, menadione, and diamide), a reducing reagent (dithiothreitol [DTT]), an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-inducing agent (tunicamycin [TM]), a cell membrane destabilizer (sodium dodecyl sulfate), cell wall stress agents (calcofluor white and Congo red), genotoxic agents (hydroxyurea [HU], methyl methanesulfonate [MMS]), osmotic shock agents (NaCl and KCl), and heavy metal stress agents (CdSO4 and CuSO4). The antifungal drugs tested included a polyene drug (amphotericin B) and azole drugs (fluconazole, ketoconazole, and itraconazole). To measure cellular sensitivity to ultraviolet (UV) radiation, cells were spotted onto YPD medium and exposed to UV (300 J/m2) using a UV cross-linker (model CK-2000; UVP, Upland, CA, USA). The plates were then further incubated for 2~4 days at 30℃ and photographed.
Fig. 2

Ysa1 was dispensable for resistance to reactive oxygen species-generating oxidizing agents and reducing agents, but promoted resistance to a thiol-specific oxidant diamide. Cryptococcus neoformans strains (wild-type [H99] and ysa1Δ [YSB2544-2546]) were grown for 16 hr at 30℃ in liquid yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) medium, 10-fold serially diluted (1~104 dilutions), and spotted (3 µL of dilution) onto YPD agar containing the indicated concentration of hydrogen peroxide or menadione (A), CuSO4 (B), diamide (C), and dithiothreitol (D). Cells were incubated at 30℃ for 3 or 4 days and photographed.

Fig. 3

Ysa1 was dispensable for the genotoxic stress response and other general environmental stress responses. Cryptococcus neoformans strains (wild-type [H99] and ysa1Δ [YSB2544-2546]) were grown for 16 hr at 30℃ in liquid yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) medium, 10-fold serially diluted (1~104 dilutions), and spotted (3 µL of dilution) onto YPD agar containing the indicated levels of ultraviolet (UV) radiation (250 J/m2), hydroxyurea (HU; 110 mM), methyl methanesulfonate (MMS; 0.04%) (A), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; 0.04%), Congo red (CR; 1%), Calcofluor white (CFW; 5 mg/mL) (C), tunicamycin (TM; 0.3 µg/mL), or CdSO4 (32.5 µM) (D). For measuring osmosensitivity, cells were spotted on YP agar containing 1M or 1.5M NaCl or KCl (B). Cells were incubated at 30℃ for 3 days and photographed.

Fig. 4

Ysa1 was involved in itraconazole resistance of Cryptococcus neoformans. C. neoformans strains (wild-type [H99] and ysa1Δ [YSB2544-254]) were grown for 16 hr at 30℃ in liquid yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) medium, 10-fold serially diluted (1~104 dilutions), and spotted (3 µL of dilution) onto YPD agar containing the indicated concentration of amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, or ketoconazole (KCZ). Cells were incubated at 30℃ for 3~4 days and photographed.

RESULTS

Discovery and disruption of a Nudix hydrolase gene, YSA1, in C. neoformans

The structural features of CNAG_02986, which was previously found to be a gromwell extract-responsive gene [12], were analyzed to confirm that CNAG_02986 was indeed a Ysa1 ortholog in C. neoformans. The annotated C. neoformans var. grubii H99 strain genome appeared to have 11 Nudix domain-containing proteins (CNAG_01864, 02986, 04731, 04732, 04718, 04852, 01900, 06903, 03396, 00265, and 00076). Six of these were homologous to Nudix hydrolase family proteins in S. cerevisiae (Fig. 1A). However, a BLAST search of an S. cerevisiae Ysa1 ortholog in the C. neoformans genome database (http://www.broadinstitute.org) generated a single hit: CNAG_02986 (score of 130.183 and e-value of 3.36E-31). The expected protein size of CNAG-02986 (215 amino acids [aa]) was comparable to that of S. cerevisiae Ysa1 (231 aa). A reverse BLAST search of the CNAG_02986 ortholog in the S. cerevisiae genome database (http://www.yeastgenome.org) also revealed Ysa1 as its closest hit. Furthermore, based on protein domain analysis conducted using Pfam (http://www.pfam.janelia.org), CNAG_02986 contains a typical Nudix domain (PF00293), which is widely found in a protein family of phosphohydrolases, with the Nudix motif (GxxxxxExxxxxxxREUxEExGU, where x is any amino acid) (Fig. 1B). Therefore we named CNAG_02986 YSA1. To characterize the functions of YSA1, we performed a gene knockout study. To this end, we constructed ysa1Δ mutants in the C. neoformans H99 strain genetic background by employing DJ-PCR with NAT-split markers and biolistic transformation (Fig. 1C) as previously reported [14, 15]. Positive ysa1Δ mutants were initially screened using diagnostic PCR (data not shown), and the correct genotype was confirmed by Southern hybridization (Fig. 1D). To confirm Ysa1-dependent phenotypic traits, and exclude phenotypes caused by unwanted mutation or genome alteration during the transformation and gene disruption process, we generated three independent ysa1Δ mutants (YSB2544, YSB2545, and YSB546). All of these mutants grew as well as the wild-type strain at different temperature ranges (from 25℃ to 39℃), suggesting that Ysa1 is dispensable for the growth of C. neoformans (data not shown).

Ysa1 was dispensable in C. neoformans for stress response to ROS-generating oxidizing agents, but promoted cellular resistance to diamide, a thiol-specific oxidant

The well-known function of Ysa1 in S. cerevisiae is its ability to control intracellular ROS levels. Accordingly, S. cerevisiae ysa1Δ mutants show increased resistance to H2O2 [9]. Therefore, we first measured the H2O2 sensitivity of C. neoformans ysa1Δ mutants. Unexpectedly, ysa1Δ mutants were as resistant to H2O2 as the wild-type strain (Fig. 2A). In response to organic peroxides, such as tert-butyl hydroperoxide, the ysa1Δ mutants also showed wild-type levels of resistance (data not shown). We tested another ROS-generating agent, menadione, which is a superoxide generator. Similarly, the ysa1Δ mutants exhibited wild-type levels of resistance to menadione (Fig. 2A). In addition to peroxides and menadione, copper ions are also able to generate endogenous ROS as a transition metal [16, 17]. In fact, S. cerevisiae ysa1Δ mutants also exhibit enhanced resistance to CuSO4 [9]. Therefore, we also measured copper ion sensitivity in the C. neoformans ysa1Δ mutants. Similarly, the ysa1Δ mutants showed wild-type levels of resistance to CuSO4 (Fig. 2B). Next, we tested the cellular susceptibility of the ysa1Δ mutants to diamide, a different type of oxidizing agent. Diamide is a thiol (SH) group-specific oxidant, but does not generate endogenous ROS when exogenously introduced. Surprisingly, all three ysa1Δ mutants exhibited enhanced sensitivity to diamide (Fig. 2C), suggesting that Ysa1 promotes cellular resistance to diamide in C. neoformans. Diamide is able to induce abnormal disulfide bond formation and perturb normal protein structure. Therefore, we examined whether the ysa1Δ mutants also exhibit enhanced sensitivity to DTT, which is a reducing agent that also perturbs protein structure by breaking disulfide bonds. Unlike diamide, the ysa1Δ mutants showed wild-type levels of sensitivity to DTT (Fig. 2D). In conclusion, Ysa1 appears to play a specific role in diamide resistance in C. neoformans.

Ysa1 was dispensable for genotoxic stress and other environmental stress responses in C. neoformans

Based on a large-scale survey of S. cerevisiae phenotypes, S. cerevisiae ysa1Δ mutants also exhibit increased sensitivity to MMS, indicating that Ysa1 could also be involved in genotoxic stress responses. Furthermore, under massive genotoxic stress, NAD+-dependent PARPs, which are involved in ADPr production along with poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolases (PARGs), are over-activated and deplete cellular NAD+, resulting in ATP loss and cell death [18, 19]. In C. neoformans, however, ysa1 mutants exhibited wild-type levels of resistance to UV radiation and genotoxic agents such as HU and MMS (Fig. 3A), suggesting that Ysa1 is mostly dispensable for genotoxic stress responses in C. neoformans. In addition, we evaluated whether Ysa1 is involved in cellular responses and adaptations to other types of stresses. In response to osmotic stress conferred by high salt concentrations (1~1.5 M NaCl or KCl), ysa1Δ mutants were as resistant as the wild-type strain (Fig. 3B). Ysa1 also appeared to be dispensable for resistance to cell membrane and wall stress (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, in response to an ER stress agent (TM) and a heavy metal (CdSO4), ysa1Δ mutants showed wild-type levels of resistance (Fig. 3D). In conclusion, Ysa1 appears to be generally dispensable for the response and adaptation to environmental stresses.

Deletion of YSA1 promoted cellular resistance to an azole drug, itraconazole, in C. neoformans

Finally, we examined the role of Ysa1 in antifungal drug resistance. Notably, the activity of some antifungal drugs has been related to ROS production. Amphotericin B, which binds to ergosterol and forms a lethal pore through the plasma membrane, has been shown to produce ROS through autoxidation, resulting in lipid peroxidation in fungi [20, 21]. Itraconazole, which inhibits sterol 14-α-demethylase and sterol biosynthesis, is also known to produce ROS, and causes lipid peroxidation in Cryptococcus gattii [20]. Therefore, we also measured the cellular susceptibility of ysa1Δ mutants to polyene (amphotericin B) and azole drugs (fluconazole, itraconazole, and ketoconazole). Interestingly, the ysa1 mutants exhibited weakly enhanced resistance to itraconazole, but not to amphotericin B and other azole drugs (fluconazoles and ketoconazoles) (Fig. 4). In summary, inhibition of YSA1 may promote resistance to itraconazole in C. neoformans.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we characterized the function of a Nudix hydrolase gene, YSA1, for the first time in C. neoformans, which appeared to contain 11 putative Nudix hydrolase genes in its genome. The functions of C. neoformans Ysa1 were shown to differ from those of S. cerevisiae Ysa1p. First, C. neoformans ysa1Δ mutants did not show any growth defects, whereas S. cerevisiae ysa1Δ mutants do have growth defects [22]. Second, C. neoformans ysa1Δ mutants were as resistant to ROS-generating oxidizing agents (H2O2 and CuSO4) as the wild-type strain, whereas S. cerevisiae ysa1Δ mutants exhibited enhanced resistance to these agents [9]. By contrast, Ysa1 appeared to be involved in resistance to diamide in C. neoformans, which is a thiol-specific oxidant but does not generate ROS. Therefore, it remains unclear whether Ysa1 directly controls intracellular ROS levels in C. neoformans. However, it is possible that other ROS defense systems sufficiently compensate for a loss of Ysa1 in C. neoformans. In fact, our study showed that the C. neoformans ysa1Δ mutants exhibited weakly increased resistance to itraconazole, but not to fluconazole. Interestingly, itraconazole, but not fluconazole, has the ability to produce intracellular ROS in addition to its Erg11 inhibitory activity [20]. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that Ysa1 may modulate intracellular ROS levels under certain circumstances. Third, C. neoformans ysa1Δ mutants did not show any altered sensitivity to MMS, whereas S. cerevisiae ysa1Δ mutants show decreased resistance to MMS [23]. Taken together, our data demonstrate that the functions of Ysa1 are likely to be divergent among eukaryotic species. The involvement of Ysa1 catalytic activity in the degradation of ADPr/OAADPr has not been biochemically demonstrated in C. neoformans. Therefore, whether or not Ysa1 is the key regulator for modulating intracellular levels of ADPr/OAADPr in C. neoformans remains elusive. Twelve Nudix hydrolases were discovered in the Aspergillus nidulans genome. Among these, NdxA and NdxC are able to hydrolyze NAD+, NADH, NADPH, and ADPr, like S. cerevisiae Nyp1, whereas NdxB and NdxD can hydrolyze ADPr, but not NAD(H) or NADPH, like S. cerevisiae Ysa1 [24]. However, the cellular functions of NdxB, which is the closest Ysa1 ortholog, have not been characterized. The role of ADPr/OAADPr as second messenger signaling molecules in C. neoformans needs to be addressed in future studies. Regardless of the limited role of Ysa1 in C. neoformans, complete elucidation of the biological roles of ADPr derivatives, which could be major Ysa1 substrates, in the pathogen requires further study. Mono- or poly(ADP-ribosyl) ation of proteins is an important post-translational modification for bacterial toxin activity as well as mammalian cell signaling and cell cycle regulation [19, 25]. Some PARPs, such as PARP-1 and PARP-2 in mammals, serve as genotoxic sensors by targeting and modifying a number of proteins involved in chromatin structure and DNA repair, with NAD+ as a substrate [19]. The breakdown of poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) is mediated by PARGs, generating a free ADPr. Mice deleted of all PARG isoforms have been reported to die at the embryonic stage due to accumulated PAR and subsequent apoptosis [26]. Therefore, coordinated action of PARP and PARG is critical for cell survival as well as ADPr metabolism. Furthermore, OAADPr, which is generated during the deacetylation of lysine residues by the SIRT family of NAD+-dependent histone deacetylases, also acts as a cellular signaling molecule, modulating gene silencing and DNA repair [27]. Interestingly, it has been reported that poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation does not occur in S. cerevisiae, but this organism does contain a sirtuin gene, SIR2 [28], and nutrient restriction is known to extend the lifespan of the budding yeast through activation of Sir2 [29, 30]. In filamentous fungi (e.g., Aspergillus fumigatus and Neurospora crassa) and mushrooms, however, PARPs were identified [25, 31, 32]. C. neoformans appears to have a single gene (CNAG_02941) containing a PARP-like domain, suggesting that poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation may also occur in C. neoformans. There is no obvious yeast ortholog to CNAG_02941. Furthermore, C. neoformans has two Sir2-like NAD+-dependent histone deacetylases (CNAG_04866.7 and _07712.7) in its genome. Therefore, the role of PARP/Sir2-dependent NAD+ metabolism and ADPr/OAADPr in cell signaling should be further addressed in other diverse fungi, as well as in C. neoformans.
  32 in total

1.  Gene disruption by biolistic transformation in serotype D strains of Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  R C Davidson; M C Cruz; R A Sia; B Allen; J A Alspaugh; J Heitman
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 2.  The recognition and removal of cellular poly(ADP-ribose) signals.

Authors:  Eva Barkauskaite; Gytis Jankevicius; Andreas G Ladurner; Ivan Ahel; Gyula Timinszky
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 5.542

3.  Failure to degrade poly(ADP-ribose) causes increased sensitivity to cytotoxicity and early embryonic lethality.

Authors:  David W Koh; Ann M Lawler; Marc F Poitras; Masayuki Sasaki; Sigrid Wattler; Michael C Nehls; Tobias Stöger; Guy G Poirier; Valina L Dawson; Ted M Dawson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Studies on the ADP-ribose pyrophosphatase subfamily of the nudix hydrolases and tentative identification of trgB, a gene associated with tellurite resistance.

Authors:  C A Dunn; S F O'Handley; D N Frick; M J Bessman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-11-05       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Metals, toxicity and oxidative stress.

Authors:  M Valko; H Morris; M T D Cronin
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Nicotinamide and PNC1 govern lifespan extension by calorie restriction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Rozalyn M Anderson; Kevin J Bitterman; Jason G Wood; Oliver Medvedik; David A Sinclair
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Synthesis and degradation of cyclic ADP-ribose by NAD glycohydrolases.

Authors:  H Kim; E L Jacobson; M K Jacobson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-09-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Global transcriptome analysis of eukaryotic genes affected by gromwell extract.

Authors:  Soohyun Bang; Dohyun Lee; Hanhe Kim; Jiyong Park; Yong-Sun Bahn
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.638

9.  Mechanism of inactivation of the polyene antibiotic amphotericin B. Evidence for radical formation in the process of autooxidation.

Authors:  M T Lamy-Freund; V F Ferreira; S Schreier
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  PARP is involved in replicative aging in Neurospora crassa.

Authors:  Gregory O Kothe; Maki Kitamura; Mitsuko Masutani; Eric U Selker; Hirokazu Inoue
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 3.495

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Nudix Effectors: A Common Weapon in the Arsenal of Plant Pathogens.

Authors:  Suomeng Dong; Yuanchao Wang
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 6.823

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.