Literature DB >> 24807595

Evaluation of mesorectal fascia in mid and low anterior rectal cancer using endorectal ultrasound is feasible and reliable: a comparison with MRI findings.

Pablo Granero-Castro1, Elena Muñoz, Matteo Frasson, Alvaro García-Granero, Pedro Esclapez, Salvador Campos, Blas Flor-Lorente, Eduardo Garcia-Granero.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accuracy of MRI in assessing mesorectal fascia and predicting circumferential resection margin decreases in low anterior rectal tumors.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the accuracy of endorectal ultrasound in predicting the pathologic circumferential resection margin in low rectal anterior tumors and to compare it with MRI findings.
DESIGN: This was a prospective series comparing the preoperative circumferential resection margin assessed by endorectal ultrasound and MRI with pathologic examination. SETTINGS: The study was conducted by a specialized colorectal multidisciplinary team at a tertiary teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Between 2002 and 2008, 76 patients with mid to low rectal cancer were preoperatively evaluated by endorectal ultrasound and MRI and underwent total mesorectal excision without neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Twenty-seven patients with posterior or postero-lateral tumors were excluded, leaving 49 patients with anterior or antero-lateral tumors for the present subanalysis. We compared preoperative circumferential resection margin status using endorectal ultrasound and MRI with pathologic examination.
INTERVENTIONS: We conducted a comparison between preoperative circumferential resection margin status and pathologic examination after total mesorectal excision surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accuracy in predicting pathologic circumferential resection margin status was measured.
RESULTS: Overall accuracy of endorectal ultrasound and MRI in assessing circumferential resection margin status was 83.7% and 91.8%, with negative predictive values of 97.2% and 97.5%. When focusing on low rectal tumors, the overall accuracy of endorectal ultrasound increased to 87.5%, whereas the accuracy of MRI decreased to 87.5%, with a negative predictive value of 95.6% for both diagnostic tests. LIMITATIONS: The sample size is small, and interobserver variability in radiologic assessment was not evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS: Endorectal ultrasound can help MRI in predicting circumferential resection margin involvement in mid to low anterior rectal cancer, especially at the low third of the rectum, with a high negative predictive value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24807595     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  8 in total

Review 1.  Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the loco-regional staging of patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Pietro Marone; Mario de Bellis; Valentina D'Angelo; Paolo Delrio; Valentina Passananti; Elena Di Girolamo; Giovanni Battista Rossi; Daniela Rega; Maura Claire Tracey; Alfonso Mario Tempesta
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-06-25

2.  Can CRM Status on MRI Predict Survival in Rectal Cancers: Experience from the Indian Subcontinent.

Authors:  Mihir Chandarana; Supreeta Arya; Jean-Louis de Menezes; Reena Engineer; Vikas Ostwal; Prachi Patil; Suman Kumar; Rohit Dusane; Ashwin D'souza; Avanish Saklani
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-02-21

Review 3.  Advances in endoscopic ultrasound imaging of colorectal diseases.

Authors:  Elena Tatiana Cârțână; Dan Ionuț Gheonea; Adrian Săftoiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Concordance and survival implications of preoperative subclassification of T3 rectal cancers by depth of mesorectal invasion using a 5-mm cut-off point with endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Stephanie García Botello; Rosa Martí Fernández; Coral Cozar Lozano; Salvador Campos Salher; Jose Martín Arévalo; David Moro Valdezate; Vicente Pla Martí; Alejandro Espí Macías
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-04

Review 5.  Practical approach to linear endoscopic ultrasound examination of the rectum and anal canal.

Authors:  Hussein Hassan Okasha; Katarzyna M Pawlak; Amr Abou-Elmagd; Ahmed El-Meligui; Hassan Atalla; Mohamed O Othman; Sameh Abou Elenin; Ahmed Alzamzamy; Reem Ezzat Mahdy
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-10-17

6.  Value of endorectal ultrasonography in measuring the extent of mesorectal invasion and substaging of T3 stage rectal cancer.

Authors:  Guangxi Zhong; Yi Xiao; Weixun Zhou; Weidong Pan; Qingli Zhu; Jing Zhang; Yuxin Jiang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 7.  Endoscopic ultrasound in oncology: An update of clinical applications in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Manuel Valero; Carlos Robles-Medranda
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-06-16

8.  The Optimal Application of Transrectal Ultrasound in Staging of Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Pragmatic Study for Accuracy Investigation.

Authors:  Yufeng Ren; Jinning Ye; Yan Wang; Weixin Xiong; Jianbo Xu; Yulong He; Shirong Cai; Min Tan; Yujie Yuan
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 4.207

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.