Literature DB >> 24806542

Is eye gaze direction always determined without intent?

Shannon O'Malley1, Derek Besner.   

Abstract

It is widely assumed that processing of gaze direction occurs "automatically," in the sense that it is reflexive (unfolds in the absence of intention). We assessed this view in a task in which participants saw a schematic face in which the eyes were gazing left or right, along with a second directional target (an arrow in Experiment 1; a directional word in Experiment 2). The eyes and other directional target were sometimes congruent and other times incongruent. On each trial, participants were cued with a tone to respond to either the direction the eyes were gazing, or the direction the noneye target indicated. The time between the onset of the task cue and the onset of the face was manipulated so that on half the trials the face and the cue were presented at the same time. Regardless of the type of target, the congruency effect was the same size at the zero SOA as it was at the 750 SOA, suggesting that eyes were not processed until participants knew what task to perform. These results are consistent with the claim that processing of gaze direction is, at least some of the time, secondary to an intent (i.e., it is not reflexive).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24806542     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0642-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  Symbolic control of visual attention.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Pratt; L Colzato; R Godijn
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-09

2.  Action-based and vision-based selection of input: two sources of control.

Authors:  Hagit Magen; Asher Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2002-09-11

3.  A paradigm for exploring what the mind does while deciding what it should do.

Authors:  Derek Besner; Stephanie Care
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2003-12

4.  Eye gaze is not unique: automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows.

Authors:  Jason Tipples
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

5.  Modularity beyond perception: evidence from the PRP paradigm.

Authors:  Hagit Magen; Asher Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Location specificity in response selection processes for visual stimuli.

Authors:  Hagit Magen; Asher Cohen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

7.  Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis.

Authors:  Agnes Moors; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  On the role of set when reading aloud: a dissociation between prelexical and lexical processing.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Paulitzki; Evan F Risko; Shannon O'Malley; Jennifer A Stolz; Derek Besner
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2009-01-13

9.  Reading aloud and the question of intent.

Authors:  Shannon O'Malley; Derek Besner
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2012-08-04

10.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  2 in total

1.  Do eyes and arrows elicit automatic orienting? Three mutually exclusive hypotheses and a test.

Authors:  Derek Besner; David McLean; Torin Young
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  If not When, then Where? Ignoring Temporal Information Eliminates Reflexive but not Volitional Spatial Orienting.

Authors:  Kaitlin E W Laidlaw; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.