| Literature DB >> 24804777 |
Boris P Ilyashuk1, Elena A Ilyashuk, Roland Psenner, Richard Tessadri, Karin A Koinig.
Abstract
Despite the fact that rock glaciers are one of the most common geomorphologicpan> class="Chemical">al expressions of mountain permafrost, the impacts of their solute fluxes on lakes still remain largely obscure. We examined water and sediment chemistry, and biota of two neighboring water bodies with and without a rock glacier in their catchments in the European Alps. Paleolimnological techniques were applied to track long-term temporal trends in the ecotoxicological state of the water bodies and to establish their baseline conditions. We show that the active rock glacier in the mineralized catchment of Lake Rasass (RAS) represents a potent source of acid rock drainage that results in enormous concentrations of metals in water, sediment, and biota of RAS. The incidence of morphological abnormalities in the RAS population of Pseudodiamesa nivosa, a chironomid midge, is as high as that recorded in chironomid populations inhabiting sites heavily contaminated by trace metals of anthropogenic origin. The incidence of morphological deformities in P. nivosa of ∼70% persisted in RAS during the last 2.5 millennia and was ∼40% in the early Holocene. The formation of RAS at the toe of the rock glacier most probably began at the onset of acidic drainage in the freshly deglaciated area. The present adverse conditions are not unprecedented in the lake's history and cannot be associated exclusively with enhanced thawing of the rock glacier in recent years.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24804777 PMCID: PMC4045335 DOI: 10.1021/es500180c
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Technol ISSN: 0013-936X Impact factor: 9.028
Figure 1Map showing the location of the study site (a) and photograph of Lake Rasass (RAS) and the adjacent pond (RPD) and their catchments (b). The red arrows indicate the boundary of the active rock glacier. The map of Italy is reproduced from http://d-maps.com/.
Physical and Chemical Properties of Water in RAS and RPD in the Early Open-Water Seasona
| RAS | RPD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| parameter | 0–5 m ( | 5–9 m ( | ( | EU limit value |
| conductivity (μS cm–1 at 25 °C) | 231 ± 46k | 857 ± 117m | 47 ± 6n | 2500 |
| total ions (μequiv·L–1) | 4,185 ± 1169k | 18,513 ± 2938m | 779 ± 103n | NA |
| Ca2+ (mg L–1) | 18 ± 6k | 76 ± 10m | 3 ± 1k | NA |
| Mg2+ (mg L–1) | 13 ± 4k | 63 ± 10m | 0.7 ± 0.1n | NA |
| Na+ (mg L–1) | 0.6 ± 0.1k | 4.0 ± 0.4m | 0.2 ± 0.1k | 200 |
| K+ (mg L–1) | 0.3 ± 0.1k | 1.1 ± 0.1m | 0.2 ± 0.1k | NA |
| SO42– (mg L–1) | 99 ± 28k | 15 ± 3n | 250 | |
| TP | 1.4 ± 0.1k | 1.6 ± 0.1k | 1.5 ± 0.5k | NA |
| NO3–-N | 191 ± 23k | 208 ± 14k | 172 ± 22k | NA |
| NH4–-N | 18 ± 5k,m | 35 ± 13m | 5 ± 1k | NA |
| Al (μg L–1) | 3 ± 1n | 200 | ||
| Cu (μg L–1) | 4 ± 1k | 9 ± 4k | <2m | 2000 |
| Fe (μg L–1) | 1 ± 1k,m | 7 ± 4m | <1k | 200 |
| Mn (μg L–1) | <1n | 50 | ||
| Ni (μg L–1) | 2 ± 2n | 20 | ||
| Sr (μg L–1) | 72 ± 19k | 277 ± 37m | 14 ± 5n | NA |
| Zn (μg L–1) | 85 ± 23k | 311 ± 29m | 3 ± 2n | NA |
| pH | 6.51 ± 0.14n | ≥6.5 | ||
RAS data for 2011–2012, and RPD data for 2010–2012.
For each parameter, values (mean ± SE) that share common letters (k, m, or n) do not differ significantly (one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test, p < 0.05).
Values are for the upper (0–5 m depth) and lower (5–9 m depth) parts of the RAS water column.
NA: not available, i.e. parameter is not regulated by the European Drinking Water Directive;[47] parameter values exceeding the appropriate European Union limit values for drinking water[47] are shown in bold.
TP = total phosphorus.
NO3–-N = nitrate-nitrogen.
NH4–-N = ammonium-nitrogen.
Figure 2Depth profiles of selected physical and chemical properties of the RAS water. Electrical conductivity (a), pH (b), total ion (c), calcium (d), magnesium (e), and sulfate (f) profiles in the RAS water column on fourth July 2012 (closed circles; the lake was ∼70% ice covered) and 29th August 2012 (open circles; ∼1.5 months prior to lake ice freeze-up).
Figure 3Concentrations (mean ± SE; n = 3) of copper (a), zinc (b), lead (c), nickel (d), chromium (e), aluminum (f), iron (g), titanium (h), manganese (i), and vanadium (j) in surface sediments and biota of RPD and the RAS shallow and deep waters. For each metal, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (one-way ANOVA, Bonferroni post hoc test, p < 0.05). The abundances of the chemical elements in the Earth’s continental crust[22] are shown with green lines.
Figure 4Micrographs (200× magnification) of larval menta of the chironomid Pseudodiamesa nivosa from the RAS modern and subfossil material: normal mentum (a) and deformed menta (b–e). The severity of the observed deformities was categorized into two classes following Lenat:[41] Class I (slight deformities)—fused median tooth (b, c), and Class II (more conspicuous deformities)—large median gap (d) and extra teeth (e). Scale bars = 0.1 mm.
Figure 5Relative abundance of Pseudodiamesa nivosa in chironomid assemblages and the total incidence of P. nivosa mentum deformities in the sediment records from RPD (a) and RAS (b), and Holocene July air temperatures (TJuly) reconstructed for the Eastern Alps (c).[65]