Literature DB >> 24804447

Comment on Murtaugh.

Michael Lavine.   

Abstract

Murtaugh and I agree on an important point: abandon accept/reject declarations. That alone will go a long way to improving statistical practice. (2) Don't confuse P values or deltaAIC with binary declarations. An argument against one is not necessarily an argument against the other. (3) Be careful interpreting a P value or deltaAIC as strength of evidence. That interpretation cannot be made formal and the connection between P, deltaAIC, and evidence must be recalibrated for each new problem. (4) Plot. Check models. Plot. Check assumptions. Plot.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24804447     DOI: 10.1890/13-1112.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  4 in total

1.  The fickle P value generates irreproducible results.

Authors:  Lewis G Halsey; Douglas Curran-Everett; Sarah L Vowler; Gordon B Drummond
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  The reign of the p-value is over: what alternative analyses could we employ to fill the power vacuum?

Authors:  Lewis G Halsey
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research.

Authors:  Valentin Amrhein; Fränzi Korner-Nievergelt; Tobias Roth
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  An autoregressive logistic model to predict the reciprocal effects of oviductal fluid components on in vitro spermophagy by neutrophils in cattle.

Authors:  Rasoul Kowsar; Behrooz Keshtegar; Mohamed A Marey; Akio Miyamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.