Literature DB >> 24804440

P values, hypothesis testing, and model selection: it's déjà vu all over again.

Aaron M Ellison, Nicholas J Gotelli, Brian D Inouye, Donald R Strong.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24804440     DOI： 10.1890/13-1911.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN： 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

1.  Analysing chemical-induced changes in macroinvertebrate communities in aquatic mesocosm experiments: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  Eduard Szöcs; Paul J Van den Brink; Laurent Lagadic; Thierry Caquet; Marc Roucaute; Arnaud Auber; Yannick Bayona; Matthias Liess; Peter Ebke; Alessio Ippolito; Cajo J F ter Braak; Theo C M Brock; Ralf B Schäfer
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  The fickle P value generates irreproducible results.

Authors:  Lewis G Halsey; Douglas Curran-Everett; Sarah L Vowler; Gordon B Drummond
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  The multiple-comparison trap and the Raven's paradox-perils of using null hypothesis testing in environmental assessment.

Authors:  Song S Qian; Thomas F Cuffney
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Relative Importance of Individual Climatic Drivers Shaping Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Communities.

Authors:  Dan Xiang; Stavros D Veresoglou; Matthias C Rillig; Tianle Xu; Huan Li; Zhipeng Hao; Baodong Chen
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  The reign of the p-value is over: what alternative analyses could we employ to fill the power vacuum?

Authors:  Lewis G Halsey
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Woody plant secondary chemicals increase in response to abundant deer and arrival of invasive plants in suburban forests.

Authors:  Janet A Morrison; Bernadette Roche; Maren Veatch-Blohm
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 7.  Why are we not evaluating multiple competing hypotheses in ecology and evolution?

Authors:  Gustavo S Betini; Tal Avgar; John M Fryxell
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Don't let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring).

Authors:  G Matt Davies; Alan Gray
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Errors in Statistical Inference Under Model Misspecification: Evidence, Hypothesis Testing, and AIC.

Authors:  Brian Dennis; José Miguel Ponciano; Mark L Taper; Subhash R Lele
Journal:  Front Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-10-21

10.  The Importance of Testing Multiple Environmental Factors in Legume-Insect Research: Replication, Reviewers, and Rebuttal.

Authors:  Scott N Johnson; Andrew N Gherlenda; Adam Frew; James M W Ryalls
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.753
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.