| Literature DB >> 24804220 |
Janelle L Jacobs1, Robin L Marcus1, Glen Morrell2, Paul LaStayo1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Greater skeletal muscle fat infiltration occurs with age and contributes to numerous negative health outcomes. The primary purpose was to determine whether intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) can be influenced by an exercise intervention and if a greater reduction in IMAT occurs with eccentric versus traditional resistance training.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24804220 PMCID: PMC3996328 DOI: 10.1155/2014/398960
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1CONSORT flow diagram.
Participant characteristics.
| Eccentric ( | Traditional ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (F : M) | 29 : 10 | 27 : 11 | 0.74 |
| Age (years) | 76.2 (7.4) | 74.6 (6.2) | 0.32 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.1 (4.8) | 29.1 (6.2) | 0.11 |
| Gait speed (m/s) | 1.14 (0.24) | 1.10 (0.25) | 0.42 |
| Comorbidities | 5.2 (2.2) | 5.3 (2.0) | 0.82 |
Mean (±SD); BMI: Body Mass Index; comorbidities: number of self-reported comorbid conditions at baseline.
Muscle composition outcomes for eccentric and traditional resistance training groups.
| Eccentric group ( | Traditional group ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretraining | Posttraining | Nine-month follow-up | Within-group change | Pretraining | Posttraining | Nine-month follow-up | Within-group change | |
| IMAT (cm2) | 29.53 (8.3) | 29.56 (7.8) | 29.33 (8.8) |
| 32.11 (11.4) | 31.75 (10.2) | 32.41 (9.3) |
|
| Lean (cm2) | 181.8 (34.2) | 183.9 (34.1) | 181.6 (31.2) |
| 193.1 (48.7) | 193.9 (48.2) | 188.6 (46.8) |
|
Eccentric group: participants who participated in eccentric resistance training as part of multimodal exercise program; traditional group: participants who participated in traditional resistance training as part of multimodal exercise program; lean: lean tissue cross-sectional area of mid-thigh; IMAT: intermuscular adipose tissue cross-sectional area of mid-thigh.
Muscle composition outcomes for participants with high and low muscle fat fractions.
| High IMAT ( | Low IMAT ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretraining | Posttraining | Nine-month follow-up | Within-group change | Pretraining | Posttraining | Nine-month follow-up | Within-group change | |
| IMAT (cm2) | 37.75 (8.8) | 35.56 (8.8) | 36.20 (8.6) |
| 25.01 (6.7) | 26.53 (7.0) | 26.38 (6.9) |
|
| Lean (cm2) | 181.6 (36.6) | 183.2 (35.6) | 178.6 (32.4) |
| 192.1 (46.1) | 193.5 (46.1) | 190.4 (44.4) |
|
| % IMAT | 17.24 (2.2) | 16.27 (2.5) | 16.88 (2.6) |
| 11.54 (1.6) | 12.15 (2.4) | 12.26 (2.2) |
|
| BMI (kg/m2) | 30.02 (5.3) | 29.87 (5.1) | 29.46 (5.2) |
| 26.42 (5.4) | 26.42 (4.9) | 26.24 (4.9) |
|
Mean (±SD); high IMAT >14.5% IMAT, low IMAT <14.5% IMAT; IMAT: intermuscular adipose tissue cross-sectional area; lean: lean tissue cross-sectional area; %IMAT: fraction IMAT per total lean and IMAT area of the mid-thigh; BMI: Body Mass Index.