Elvin A Alemán1, Chamaree de Silva2, Eric M Patrick1, Karin Musier-Forsyth2, David Rueda3. 1. Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University , 5101 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States. 2. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Center for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University , 100 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States. 3. Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University , 5101 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States ; Department of Medicine, Section of Virology and Single Molecule Imaging Group, MRC Clinical Sciences Center, Imperial College , Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom ; Department of Medicine, Section of Virology and Single Molecule Imaging Group, MRC Clinical Sciences Center, Imperial College , Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Fluorescent nucleotide analogues, such as 2-aminopurine (2AP) and pyrrolo-C (PyC), have been extensively used to study nucleic acid local conformational dynamics in bulk experiments. Here we present a proof-of-principle approach using 2AP and PyC fluorescence at the single-molecule level. Our data show that ssDNA, dsDNA, or RNA containing both 2AP and PyC can be monitored using single-molecule fluorescence and a click chemistry immobilization method. We demonstrate that this approach can be used to monitor DNA and RNA in real time. This is the first reported assay using fluorescent nucleotide analogs at the single-molecule level. We anticipate that single 2AP or PyC fluorescence will have numerous applications in studies of DNA and RNA, including protein-induced base-flipping dynamics in protein-nucleic acid complexes.
Fluorescent nucleotide analogues, such as 2-aminopurine (2AP) and pyrrolo-C (PyC), have been extensively used to study nucleic acid local conformational dynamics in bulk experiments. Here we present a proof-of-principle approach using 2AP and PyC fluorescence at the single-molecule level. Our data show that ssDNA, dsDNA, or RNA containing both 2AP and PyC can be monitored using single-molecule fluorescence and a click chemistry immobilization method. We demonstrate that this approach can be used to monitor DNA and RNA in real time. This is the first reported assay using fluorescent nucleotide analogs at the single-molecule level. We anticipate that single 2AP or PyC fluorescence will have numerous applications in studies of DNA and RNA, including protein-induced base-flipping dynamics in protein-nucleic acid complexes.
For over two decades single-molecule
fluorescence (SMF) techniques have provided unique opportunities to
study the structural dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids otherwise
hidden in ensemble-averaged experiments.[1−6] Traditionally, visible-range fluorophores have been used for these
studies due to their high fluorescence quantum yield and photostability.[7] Expanding this range to the UV region would enable
the use of naturally fluorescent amino acids and nucleotide analogues
such as tryptophan, 2-aminopurine (2AP), and pyrrolo-C (PyC), thus
eliminating the need to introduce artificial labels (Scheme 1). Single-molecule experiments in the UV region
have been previously reported with cofactors, such as nicotinamide
adenine dinucleotide (NAD), flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), and
flavin mononucleotide (FMN),[2,8,9] but not with nucleotide analogues. Indeed, single-molecule imaging
of 2AP and PyC incorporated in DNA or RNA has been considered to be
essentially impossible due to their low quantum yield.[10]
Scheme 1
Unlike canonical nucleobases,
2AP fluoresces due to the presence
of an energy barrier between a ππ* excited state and the
ground state.[11] This barrier may form a
minimum well in the excited-state potential energy of 2AP that is
below the intersection point with the ground-state potential energy
surface and from where the fluorescence process can take place.[11] Here we report a new assay to measure 2AP and
PyC fluorescence at the single-molecule level. We also apply this
assay to measure the fluorescence of 2AP and PyC in single-stranded
(ss) and double-stranded (ds) DNA and RNA. 2AP has been extensively
used in bulk studies to characterize local nucleotide dynamics in
DNA, RNA, and protein complexes[12−16] because their relative fluorescence yields depend dramatically on
the environment (0.68 when solvent exposed, 0.04 to 0.18 in ssDNA
and 0.02 in dsDNA, Figure S1 in the Supporting
Information).[10,17] Although the exact mechanism
for 2AP quenching in dsDNA is still controversial,[18−20] it is widely
accepted that stacking interactions between 2AP and neighboring bases
result in fluorescence quenching.[16,21,22]Single-molecule 2AP fluorescence. (a) Prism-based, total
internal
reflection microscope with 325 nm excitation for 2AP fluorescence.
2AP is linked through a long, flexible linker to surface-immobilized
DNA. (b) Fluorescence image of individual FREE-2AP molecules (bright
spots). (c) Fluorescence trajectory of FREE-2AP reveals the absence
of blinking and single-step photobleaching. (d) Histogram of photobleaching
times (tPhb).To characterize the fluorescence of 2AP at the single-molecule
level, we surface-immobilized dsDNA on a quartz microscope slide (0.013
± 0.001 molecules/μm2) in standard buffer (50
mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM Na+, 5 mM Mg2+)
using a recently developed click chemistry-based approach (Figure 1a).[23] The widely used
biotin–streptavidin immobilization approach cannot be used
here due to the fluorescence background caused by the numerous tryptophan
residues in streptavidin.[24] We linked 2AP
at the 5′ terminus of a dsDNA through a triethylene glycol
linker to mimic the behavior of free 2AP in solution (FREE-2AP). Following
excitation of 2AP at 325 nm (3 mW) using a home-built, prism-based
total internal reflection fluorescence microscope (Figure 1a), 2AP fluorescence was imaged onto a back-illuminated,
electron-multiplied CCD camera (Figure 1b).
Figure 1
Single-molecule 2AP fluorescence. (a) Prism-based, total
internal
reflection microscope with 325 nm excitation for 2AP fluorescence.
2AP is linked through a long, flexible linker to surface-immobilized
DNA. (b) Fluorescence image of individual FREE-2AP molecules (bright
spots). (c) Fluorescence trajectory of FREE-2AP reveals the absence
of blinking and single-step photobleaching. (d) Histogram of photobleaching
times (tPhb).
Characteristic single-molecule fluorescence trajectories (Figure 1c) reveal that 2AP fluoresces steadily over almost
a minute prior to photobleaching (Phb) in a single step. A photobleaching-time
analysis of 335 trajectories reveals that in the absence of an oxygen
scavenging system 2AP photobleaching times are exponentially distributed
with a lifetime τPhb = 41 ± 2 s (Figure 1d). Interestingly, <0.3% of molecules observed
exhibit any fluorescence blinking at ∼30 frames per second
acquisition time. We also find that ∼6% of the traces exhibit
two-step photobleaching and <1% exhibit three steps or more (Figure
S2 in the Supporting Information). The
number of steps indicates the number of fluorescent molecules immobilized
within a single diffraction-limited spot. When 2AP was substituted
by a nonfluorescent adenine base, we did not observe any fluorescence,
confirming that the observed fluorescence arises from 2AP.In
contrast, the single-molecule fluorescence trajectories of 2AP-incorporated
eight nucleotides from the 5′ end of the ssDNA (2AP-ssDNA,
Table S1 in the Supporting Information)
exhibit random jumps between a bright (ON) and a dark (OFF) state
(Figure 2a). Dwell-time analysis of the ON
and OFF states (112 molecules) reveals distributions with lifetimes
τON = 2.3 ± 0.3 s and τOFF =
2.1 ± 0.3 s (Figure 2b). The exact origin
of these blinking dynamics is unclear. However, on the basis of prior
bulk experiments and theoretical calculations of 2AP[21,22] as well as on the lack of fluorescence blinking of FREE-2AP, a possible
explanation is that this blinking corresponds to changes in the fluorophore’s
local environment, for example, caused by 2AP stacking and unstacking
with neighboring bases. Alternatively, the slow dynamics may simply
represent nonspecific interactions between the ssDNA and the slide
surface.[25] Although more experiments are
needed to fully characterize what induces the ON-OFF transitions,
these data show that this approach can be used to measure 2AP fluorescence
at the single-molecule level and even report on different local environments.
It is interesting to compare the brightness of FREE-2AP with 2AP in
ssDNA. Because the on duty cycle is ∼50%, one would expect
FREE-2AP to be significantly brighter than 2AP in ssDNA in ensemble-averaged
experiments. Indeed, the fluorescence intensity for 2AP in ssDNA is
about three times lower (Figure S1 in the Supporting
Information). In addition, a population of dark (or transiently
bright) molecules that we cannot observe in our experiment may also
contribute to decreasing the bulk intensity. These single-molecule
data raise the interesting possibility that 2AP quantum yields measured
in bulk experiments result from the time average of at least two dynamic
populations with high (bright) and low (dark) quantum yields.
Figure 2
Fluorescence
of single 2AP molecules incorporated into DNA. (a)
Three fluorescence trajectories of 2AP in ssDNA. Fluorescence intensity
jumps between a bright and a dark state. (b) Dwell-time histograms
of 2AP-ssDNA ON (τON) and OFF (τOFF) states (112 molecules). (c) Experimental setup combining 532 and
325 nm excitation for Cy3 and 2AP, respectively. (d) First, Cy3 is
excited at 532 nm and fluorescence is monitored to localize dsDNA
molecules. Next, 2AP is excited at 325 nm. (e) SM trajectories of
2AP in dsDNA reveal a small subpopulation of molecules with ON–OFF
transitions. (f) Dwell time histograms of 2AP-dsDNA ON (τON) and OFF (τOFF) states (182 molecules).
To characterize the fluorescence properties of 2AP in dsDNA, we
annealed a 15-nucleotide complementary oligonucleotide to 2AP-ssDNA.
To confirm hybridization, we labeled the complementary strand with
3′-Cy3 (Cy3cDNA, Figure 2c, Table S1
in the Supporting Information). The surface-immobilized
dsDNAs were first localized by exciting Cy3 with a 532 nm laser, and
we monitored its fluorescence until photobleaching (∼40 s)
(Figure 2d). Next, we switched to a 325 nm
laser to monitor 2AP fluorescence (Figure 2d). Of the >200 dsDNA molecules observed, 89 ± 2% exhibited
no 2AP fluorescence, as expected. Surprisingly, a small population
molecules (11 ± 2%) behaved similarly to the ssDNA, with random
jumps between ON and OFF states (Figure 2e),
even though the complementary strand was present (as evidenced by
Cy3 fluorescence). Interestingly, the presence of multiple populations
is consistent with prior bulk fluorescence lifetime measurements of
2AP in nucleic acids, which also revealed a small population (∼10%)
of 2AP molecules with a fluorescence lifetime comparable to free 2AP.[26] A dwell time analysis (182 molecules) reveals
that the lifetimes for this minor population (τON = 1.6 ± 0.1 s and τOFF = 1.2 ± 0.1 s,
Figure 2f) are similar to those of ssDNA (Figure 2a). Several factors may contribute to this blinking
behavior, such as 2AP stacking and unstacking with neighboring bases,
the influence of a strong π-stack of 6 GC base pairs neighboring
the 2AP (Table S1 in the Supporting Information),[27] or even nonspecific interactions
with the slide surface. Nonetheless, the observation that single 2AP
molecules blink when incorporated into ssDNA or dsDNA suggests that
this approach may be used to monitor local nucleotide dynamics in
real time. Future experiments with different sequences and 2AP in
different locations and in variable ionic strength buffers will help
elucidate the molecular origin of this blinking behavior.Fluorescence
of single 2AP molecules incorporated into DNA. (a)
Three fluorescence trajectories of 2AP in ssDNA. Fluorescence intensity
jumps between a bright and a dark state. (b) Dwell-time histograms
of 2AP-ssDNA ON (τON) and OFF (τOFF) states (112 molecules). (c) Experimental setup combining 532 and
325 nm excitation for Cy3 and 2AP, respectively. (d) First, Cy3 is
excited at 532 nm and fluorescence is monitored to localize dsDNA
molecules. Next, 2AP is excited at 325 nm. (e) SM trajectories of
2AP in dsDNA reveal a small subpopulation of molecules with ON–OFF
transitions. (f) Dwell time histograms of 2AP-dsDNA ON (τON) and OFF (τOFF) states (182 molecules).We also performed single-molecule
experiments with 2AP across an
abasic site on dsDNA (aDNA, Table S1 in the Supporting
Information). In 10 mM MgCl2, two characteristic
behaviors are observed in the resulting time trajectories. The majority
of molecules (79%) exhibit rapid transitions between ON and OFF states
(Figure 3a), comparable to those observed with
2AP on ssDNA. A dwell-time analysis shows that the blinking rate constants
for this population (kON = 0.6 s–1, kOFF = 0.3 s–1, Figure
S3 in the Supporting Information) are similar
to those of 2AP-ssDNA. A minor population (∼21%), exhibits
constant fluorescence with single-step photobleaching (Figure 3b), similar to FREE-2AP. On the basis of the FREE-2AP
and ssDNA data, it is possible that these two populations correspond
to two distinct 2AP conformations or interactions with the DNA. It
has been previously shown that binding of divalent cations to 2-aminopurine
(2AP) opposite to an abasic site induces a conformational change that
increases 2AP accessibility to solvent.[28,29] To test whether
the minor population corresponds to solvent-exposed 2AP, we increased
the [Mg2+] to 20 and 50 mM. The data show that, as expected,
the static fraction increases to 35 and 49% (Figure 3c), respectively, while the rate constants of the blinking
population remain unchanged (Figure S3 in the Supporting Information). These results are consistent with
the assignment that the static population corresponds to solvent-exposed
2AP (similar to FREE-2AP), whereas the blinking population exhibits
a local environment similar to ssDNA (such as an abasic nucleotide).
Figure 3
Single-molecule
fluorescence of 2AP across an abasic site in dsDNA.
Two populations are observed: (a) a major population exhibits ON–OFF
(blinking) fluorescence transitions and (b) a minor population exhibits
static fluorescence with single-step photobleaching. (c) Static population
fraction increases with Mg2+ ion concentration.
Single-molecule
fluorescence of 2AP across an abasic site in dsDNA.
Two populations are observed: (a) a major population exhibits ON–OFF
(blinking) fluorescence transitions and (b) a minor population exhibits
static fluorescence with single-step photobleaching. (c) Static population
fraction increases with Mg2+ ion concentration.Next, we examined whether 2AP SMF can be used to
study the formation
of DNA–protein complexes (Figure S4a in the Supporting Information). The restriction enzyme PspGI (a gift from Dr. A. Bhagwat, Wayne State University) binds the
canonical sequence 5′-CCAGG in dsDNA and flips out the middle
adenosine and its complementary thymine.[30] We substituted this adenine by 2AP and monitored its fluorescence
in the absence and presence of 250 nM PspGI. In presence
of the enzyme, 4% of molecules exhibit a very long-lived ON state
(Figure S4b in the Supporting Information), which is never observed in the absence of the enzyme or in experiments
with only enzyme. It is possible that the low fraction of molecules
in this long-lived bright state may reflect the weak binding affinity
of PspGI (Kd = 0.5 μM).[31] Unfortunately, higher PspGI
concentrations result in a significant tryptophan fluorescence background
signal impeding these experiments. Nevertheless, the observation of
a long-lived bright state, in principle, suggests that 2AP flipping
by the enzyme may be directly monitored with this assay, and we will
explore this possibility in future experiments.A second fluorescent
nucleotide analog PyC was also tested as a
single-molecule probe. PyC was incorporated into a tRNAPro molecule[32] by substituting the base at
position C74 with the fluorescent analog (Figure 4a). The tRNAPro construct is composed of a synthetic
16-mer RNA oligonucleotide with an internal PyC and a 5′-azide
for surface immobilization[23] annealed to
a transcribed 5′-RNA 57-mer (Figure 4a).
Figure 4
Single-molecule fluorescence of PyC in tRNAPro. (a)
PyC-labeled tRNAPro is composed of a synthetic 3′-16-mer
(red) annealed to a transcribed 5′-57-mer (black). The 16-mer
strand includes PyC (C74) and 5′-N3 for surface
immobilization. (b) Fluorescence image of the surface-immobilized
16-mer strands. Each bright spot corresponds to an individual PyC-labeled
16-mer. (c) SM trajectory for a single PyC-16-mer molecule and (d)
for an annealed/folded PyC-tRNAPro.
Single-molecule fluorescence of PyC in tRNAPro. (a)
PyC-labeled tRNAPro is composed of a synthetic 3′-16-mer
(red) annealed to a transcribed 5′-57-mer (black). The 16-mer
strand includes PyC (C74) and 5′-N3 for surface
immobilization. (b) Fluorescence image of the surface-immobilized
16-mer strands. Each bright spot corresponds to an individual PyC-labeled
16-mer. (c) SM trajectory for a single PyC-16-mer molecule and (d)
for an annealed/folded PyC-tRNAPro.The 16-mer alone reveals steady PyC fluorescence with only
6% of
all trajectories exhibiting any blinking (Figure 4b,c), similar to FREE-2AP. It is interesting to note that
unlike 2AP in ssDNA PyC is not quenched in this 16-mer oligo. However,
the quenching mechanism of PyC remains largely unexplored, and it
may differ significantly from 2AP.[33] In
contrast, most trajectories (∼60%) obtained with the annealed
PyC-tRNAPro construct exhibit blinking dynamics (Figure 2d and Figure S5 in the Supporting
Information). Analysis of 100 fluorescent trajectories reveals
an average of ∼2 fluorescent bursts per trajectory with an
average duration of ∼5.5 s per burst. The fraction of time
during which the signal is above background is ∼4.5%. It is
possible that in the fully annealed tRNAPro PyC forms transient
stacking interactions with neighboring bases,[32] leading to this blinking. But PyC may also be affected by other
factors such as nonspecific interactions with the surface. Future
experiments will address this issue directly.In summary, we
have shown that the fluorescent nucleotide analogs
2AP and PyC can be monitored at the single-molecule level and used
to probe different local environments in DNA and RNA. Using 2AP single-molecule
fluorescence, we show that 2AP in 2AP-ssDNA and -dsDNA jumps between
bright and dark states, which may enable monitoring base-flipping
dynamics in free nucleic acids or in complexes with proteins, such
as PspGI. Similarly, PyC exhibits steady fluorescence
in a short 16-mer, but its blinking increases when incorporated into
tRNAPro. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents
the first demonstration of nucleotide analog fluorescence at the single-molecule
level. Future experiments will elucidate the molecular origin of the
observed blinking, enabling the study of local nucleotide base flipping
dynamics in DNA and RNA and protein–nucleic acid complexes
at the single-molecule level. Further gains in experimental sensitivity
will likely arise from the development of cameras with enhanced sensitivities
in the ultraviolet region of the electromagnetic spectrum as well
as the synthesis of novel fluorescent base analogs with higher quantum
yields or with emission wavelengths in the visible range.
Authors: Oscar J G Somsen; Linda B Keukens; M Niels de Keijzer; Arie van Hoek; Herbert van Amerongen Journal: Chemphyschem Date: 2005-08-12 Impact factor: 3.102
Authors: Jeff D Ballin; Shashank Bharill; Elizabeth J Fialcowitz-White; Ignacy Gryczynski; Zygmunt Gryczynski; Gerald M Wilson Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2007-11-13 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: David Nobis; Rachel S Fisher; Mats Simmermacher; Patrycja A Hopkins; Yitzhak Tor; Anita C Jones; Steven W Magennis Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Anders Foller Larsen; Blaise Dumat; Moa S Wranne; Christopher P Lawson; Søren Preus; Mattias Bood; Henrik Gradén; L Marcus Wilhelmsson; Morten Grøtli Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: George N Samaan; Mckenzie K Wyllie; Julian M Cizmic; Lisa-Maria Needham; David Nobis; Katrina Ngo; Susan Andersen; Steven W Magennis; Steven F Lee; Byron W Purse Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2020-12-28 Impact factor: 9.825