| Literature DB >> 24803920 |
Marie-Christine Simard-Meilleur1, Stéphan Troyanov2, Louise Roy1, Etienne Dalaire3, Soumeya Brachemi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The appropriate observation period, rate and risk factors of complications after a percutaneous renal biopsy remain debated.Entities:
Keywords: Hematoma; Kidney biopsy; Risk factors; Timing of complications
Year: 2014 PMID: 24803920 PMCID: PMC4000304 DOI: 10.1159/000360087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nephron Extra ISSN: 1664-5529
Biopsy procedure and adequacy (n = 312)
| Left kidney, % | 81 |
| Kidney size, cm | 11±1.6 |
| Ultrasound/CT scan, % | 93/7 |
| Needle gauge 14, 16, 18, % | 14, 81, 5 |
| Number of passes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, % | 2, 39, 50, 6, 2, 1 |
| Number of glomeruli | 12 (9–22) |
| <8 glomeruli, % | 22 |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range), except where otherwise indicated. A minimum of 8 glomeruli was defined as an adequate specimen according to the Banff classification of renal allograft pathology.
Complications
| Symptomatic hematoma, % | 15 |
| Pain warranting radiologic assessment, % | 7 |
| Drop of ≥10 g/l in Hb, % | 13 |
| Macroscopic hematuria | 2 |
| Symptomatic hypotension, % | 3 |
| Macroscopic hematuria, % | 5 |
| RBC transfusion, % | 9 |
| Angio-intervention, % | 1 |
| Urinary infection, n | 1 |
With a radiological hematoma. Categories are not mutually exclusive.
Timing of complications
| <8 h | 8–12 h | 12–24 h | ≥24 h | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All patients, % | 84 | 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Inpatients, % | 72 | 3 | 15 | 10 |
| Outpatients, % | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fig. 1Symptomatic hematoma and PLT level. PLT count was missing in 1 subject. The number of individuals within each category who received PLT transfusion is given in parentheses. The normal PLT count was ≥140 × 109/l in our laboratory.
Comparison of inpatients and outpatients
| Inpatients (53%) | Outpatients (47%) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 54 ± 16 | 53 ± 15 | 0.67 |
| Female gender, % | 48 | 55 | 0.25 |
| Uncontrolled hypertension, % | 14 | 7 | 0.04 |
| Hepatic disease, % | 10 | 5 | 0.10 |
| Dialysis, % | 18 | 1 | <0.001 |
| eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m2 | 24 (10–53) | 54 (32–83) | <0.001 |
| Hb, g/l | 101 ± 18 | 125 ± 20 | <0.001 |
| PLT, ×109/l | 270 ± 116 | 222 ± 103 | 0.002 |
| INR | 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | 1.0 (1.0–1.1) | <0.001 |
| Abnormal platelet function test, % | 11 | 11 | 0.95 |
| PLT transfusion, % | 5 | 0 | 0.006 |
| FFP, % | 6 | 1 | 0.01 |
| Desmopressin, % | 43 | 22 | <0.001 |
| Symptomatic hematoma, % | 18 | 12 | 0.13 |
| Macroscopic hematuria, % | 6 | 4 | 0.55 |
| Angio-intervention, n | 3 | 0 | 0.10 |
| Transfusion, % | 17 | 1 | <0.001 |
Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range), except where otherwise indicated.
Fig. 2Symptomatic hematoma and size of biopsy needle. Needle biopsy data was missing in 6 subjects. The number of individuals within each category is given in parentheses. The median (interquartile ranges given in parentheses) number of passes is shown.
Fig. 3Biopsy needle size and number of glomeruli. Needle biopsy data was missing in 6 subjects, 23 biopsies for renal masses were excluded. The number of individuals within each category is given in parentheses. The median (interquartile ranges given in parentheses) number of passes is shown.