Literature DB >> 24803811

Clinical and histopathological correlations of fecal calprotectin release in colorectal carcinoma.

Frank Serge Lehmann1, Francesca Trapani1, Ida Fueglistaler1, Luigi Maria Terracciano1, Markus von Flüe1, Gieri Cathomas1, Andreas Zettl1, Pascal Benkert1, Daniel Oertli1, Christoph Beglinger1.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine calprotectin release before and after colorectal cancer operation and compare it to tumor and histopathological parameters.
METHODS: The study was performed on patients with diagnosed colorectal cancer admitted for operation. Calprotectin was measured in a single stool sample before and three months after the operation using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Calprotectin levels greater than or equal to 50 μg/g were considered positive. The compliance for collecting stool samples was assessed and the value of calprotectin was correlated to tumor and histopathological parameters of intra- and peri-tumoral inflammation. Surgical specimens were fixed in neutral buffered formalin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Staging was performed according to the Dukes classification system and the 7(th) edition tumor node metastasis classification system. Intra- and peri-tumoral inflammation was graded according to the Klintrup criteria. Immunohistochemical quantification was performed for MPO, CD45R0, TIA-1, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD57, and granzyme B. Statistical significance was measured using Wilcoxon signed rank test, Kruskal Wallis test and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient as appropriate.
RESULTS: Between March 2009 and May 2011, 80 patients with colorectal cancer (46 men and 34 women, with mean age of 71 ± 11.7 years old) were enrolled in the study. Twenty-six patients had rectal carcinoma, 29 had left-side tumors, 23 had right-side tumors, and 2 had bilateral carcinoma. In total, 71.2% of the patients had increased levels of calprotectin before the operation (median 205 μg/g, range 50-2405 μg/g) and experienced a significant decrease three months after the operation (46 μg/g, range 10-384 μg/g, P < 0001). The compliance for collecting stool samples was 89.5%. Patients with T3 and T4 tumors had significantly higher values than those with T1 and T2 cancers (P = 0.022). For all other tumor parameters (N, M, G, L, V, Pn) and location, no significant difference in calprotectin concentration was found. Furthermore, the calprotectin levels and histological grading of both peri- and intra-tumoral inflammation was not correlated. Additional testing with specific markers for lymphocytes and neutrophils also revealed no statistically significant correlation.
CONCLUSION: Fecal calprotectin decreases significantly after colorectal cancer operation. Its value depends exclusively on the individual T-stage, but not on other tumor or histopathological parameters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calprotectin; Colorectal cancer; Granulocytes; Inflammation; Tumor size

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24803811      PMCID: PMC4009532          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.4994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  29 in total

1.  Assessment of the neutrophil dominating protein calprotectin in feces. A methodologic study.

Authors:  A G Røseth; M K Fagerhol; E Aadland; H Schjønsby
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Antimicrobial actions of calcium binding leucocyte L1 protein, calprotectin.

Authors:  M Steinbakk; C F Naess-Andresen; E Lingaas; I Dale; P Brandtzaeg; M K Fagerhol
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-09-29       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  A new fecal calprotectin test for colorectal neoplasia. Clinical results and comparison with previous method.

Authors:  B Johne; O Kronborg; H I Tøn; J Kristinsson; P Fuglerud
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  Faecal calprotectin levels in a high risk population for colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  O Kronborg; M Ugstad; P Fuglerud; B Johne; J Hardcastle; J H Scholefield; K Vellacott; V Moshakis; J R Reynolds
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Fecal calprotectin: validation as a noninvasive measure of bowel inflammation in childhood inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  S K Bunn; W M Bisset; M J Main; E S Gray; S Olson; B E Golden
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.839

6.  Sigmoid carcinoma mimicking an intra-abdominal abscess in an 111In-labeled white blood cell scan.

Authors:  W Becker; R Schäffer; W Börner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1985

7.  The relationship between tumour site, clinicopathological characteristics and cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A G M T Powell; R Wallace; R F McKee; J H Anderson; J J Going; J Edwards; P G Horgan
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Faecal calprotectin and faecal occult blood tests in the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma and adenoma.

Authors:  J Tibble; G Sigthorsson; R Foster; R Sherwood; M Fagerhol; I Bjarnason
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Use of surrogate markers of inflammation and Rome criteria to distinguish organic from nonorganic intestinal disease.

Authors:  Jeremy A Tibble; Gudmundur Sigthorsson; Russell Foster; Ian Forgacs; Ingvar Bjarnason
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  False positive localisation of indium-111 granulocytes in colonic carcinoma.

Authors:  S H Saverymuttu; P Maltby; P Batman; A E Joseph; D Maxwell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  The role and utility of faecal markers in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Frank S Lehmann; Emanuel Burri; Christoph Beglinger
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 2.  Fecal calprotectin: its scope and utility in the management of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Shapur Ikhtaire; Mohammad Sharif Shajib; Walter Reinisch; Waliul Islam Khan
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Serum calprotectin: a new potential biomarker for thyroid papillary carcinoma.

Authors:  S Tabur; H Korkmaz; M Özkaya; U Elboğa; M Tarakçıoglu; N Aksoy; E Akarsu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-04-29

4.  The role of faecal calprotectin in diagnosis and staging of colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fiona A Ross; James H Park; David Mansouri; Emilie Combet; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan; Campbell S D Roxburgh
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  The Vampire Study: Significant elevation of faecal calprotectin in healthy volunteers after 300 ml blood ingestion mimicking upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Stephan R Vavricka; Henriette Heinrich; Simon Buetikofer; Flavia Breitenmoser; Emanuel Burri; Xiaoye Schneider-Yin; Jasmin Barman-Aksoezen; Luc Biedermann; Michael Scharl; Jonas Zeitz; Gerhard Rogler; Benjamin Misselwitz; Matthias Sauter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 6.  Role of S100 Proteins in Colorectal Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Paula Moravkova; Darina Kohoutova; Stanislav Rejchrt; Jiri Cyrany; Jan Bures
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.260

7.  Pre-diagnostic faecal calprotectin levels in patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Nathalie Blad; Richard Palmqvist; Pontus Karling
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Calprotectin: from biomarker to biological function.

Authors:  Almina Jukic; Latifa Bakiri; Erwin F Wagner; Herbert Tilg; Timon E Adolph
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 23.059

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.