Literature DB >> 22507826

The relationship between tumour site, clinicopathological characteristics and cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer.

A G M T Powell1, R Wallace, R F McKee, J H Anderson, J J Going, J Edwards, P G Horgan.   

Abstract

AIM: It is recognised that colorectal cancer may arise from different genomic instability pathways. There is evidence to suggest that colon and rectal cancers exhibit different clinicopathological features. We examined the relationship between tumour site, clinicopathological characteristics and cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer.
METHOD: Four hundred and eleven patients who underwent surgery. Clinicopathological data including components of the Peterson index, Klintrup scores, haemoglobin and the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) were studied.
RESULTS: There were 134 (33%) right sided, 125 (30%) left sided and 152 (37%) rectal tumours. Emergency presentation (P < 0.001), anaemia (P < 0.001), higher mGPS (P < 0.001), advanced T stage (P < 0.001), poor differentiation (P < 0.001) and older age (P < 0.05) were more commonly observed in right sided cancer. The mean follow-up was 94 months (minimum 36 months) and 114 patients died of cancer. There was no difference between tumour site and survival (P = 0.427). On multivariate analysis older age (P = 0.015), lymph node ratio (P < 0.001), mGPS (P = 0.028), Peterson Index (P < 0.001) and Klintrup score (P = 0.008) were independently related to cancer-specific survival. Klintrup score was only associated with poor cancer-specific survival in rectal cancer (P = 0.009).
CONCLUSION: The study suggests that colorectal cancer is a group of heterogeneous tumours with different clinicopathological features. Despite this, there was no difference between tumour site and survival. The prognostic role of clinicopathological factors in tumours arising from different genomic instability pathways requires further study.
© 2012 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2012 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22507826     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03048.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  25 in total

1.  The modified Glasgow prognostic score for early mortality in patients with synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tomohiro Adachi; Takao Hinoi; Minoru Hattori; Hiroyuki Egi; Manabu Shimomura; Yasufumi Saito; Hiroyuki Sawada; Masashi Miguchi; Hiroaki Niitsu; Shoichiro Mukai; Takuya Yano; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Outcomes of right-sided and left-sided colon cancer after curative resection.

Authors:  Chien-Yi Yang; Min-Hsuan Yen; Kee-Thai Kiu; Yu-Ting Chen; Tung-Cheng Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Clinical impact of single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal resection for advanced colon cancer: propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Masashi Yamamoto; Mitsuhiro Asakuma; Keitaro Tanaka; Shinsuke Masubuchi; Masatsugu Ishii; Wataru Osumi; Hiroki Hamamoto; Junji Okuda; Kazuhisa Uchiyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Pathologic factors are more important than tumor location in long-term survival in colon cancer.

Authors:  L G J Leijssen; A M Dinaux; H Kunitake; L G Bordeianou; D L Berger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Clinical and histopathological correlations of fecal calprotectin release in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Frank Serge Lehmann; Francesca Trapani; Ida Fueglistaler; Luigi Maria Terracciano; Markus von Flüe; Gieri Cathomas; Andreas Zettl; Pascal Benkert; Daniel Oertli; Christoph Beglinger
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  The Worse Prognosis of Right-Sided Compared with Left-Sided Colon Cancers: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Masashi Yahagi; Koji Okabayashi; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Masashi Tsuruta; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  An appraisal of lymph node ratio in colon and rectal cancer: not one size fits all.

Authors:  M Medani; Niall Kelly; George Samaha; G Duff; Vourneen Healy; Elizabeth Mulcahy; Eoghan Condon; David Waldron; Jean Saunders; J Calvin Coffey
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  The impact of postoperative inflammation on recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Daiki Matsubara; Tomohiro Arita; Masayoshi Nakanishi; Yoshiaki Kuriu; Yasutoshi Murayama; Michihiro Kudou; Hirotaka Konishi; Shuhei Komatsu; Atsushi Shiozaki; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Different clinicopathologic features and favorable outcomes of patients with stage III left-sided colon cancer.

Authors:  Ching-Wen Huang; Hsiang-Lin Tsai; Ming-Yii Huang; Chun-Ming Huang; Yung-Sung Yeh; Cheng-Jen Ma; Jaw-Yuan Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Is the lymph node ratio superior to the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM system in prognosis of colon cancer?

Authors:  Leif Schiffmann; Anne Karen Eiken; Michael Gock; Ernst Klar
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.