BACKGROUND: Mammographic density represents epithelial and stromal proliferation, while insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3, growth hormone (GH), and estrogen may influence cellular proliferation. However, whether these growth factors independently, or in combination with estrogen, influence mammographic density in premenopausal women remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Growth factors were assessed in 202 ovulating premenopausal women participating in the Energy Balance and Breast Cancer Aspects-I study. Estrogen was assessed in serum, and daily in saliva, throughout a menstrual cycle. Computer-assisted mammographic density (Madena) was obtained from digitized mammograms (days 7-12 of the menstrual cycle). Associations between growth factors, estrogen, and mammographic density were studied in regression models. RESULTS: Women with a mean age of 30.7 years had a mean percent mammographic density of 29.8%. Among women in the strata (above median split) of IGF-1 (>25 nmol/l) or GH (>0.80 mlU/l), we observed that an increase in salivary 17β-estradiol was associated with a higher odds for having higher percent mammographic density (>28.5%). The odds ratios (ORs) per standard deviation increase in 17β-estradiol were 1.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-3.03] in the high IGF-1 stratum and 2.08 (95% CI 1.10-3.94) in the high GH stratum. Furthermore, women in these strata of growth factors (above median) who had an overall average 17β-estradiol above median (>16.8 pmol/l) had higher ORs for having higher percent mammographic density (>28.5%): IGF-1 4.13 (95 % CI 1.33-12.83) and GH 4.17 (95 % CI 1.41-12.28). CONCLUSION: Growth factors, in combination with cycling estrogen, were associated with percent mammographic density, and may be of potential clinical relevance.
BACKGROUND: Mammographic density represents epithelial and stromal proliferation, while insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3, growth hormone (GH), and estrogen may influence cellular proliferation. However, whether these growth factors independently, or in combination with estrogen, influence mammographic density in premenopausal women remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Growth factors were assessed in 202 ovulating premenopausal women participating in the Energy Balance and Breast Cancer Aspects-I study. Estrogen was assessed in serum, and daily in saliva, throughout a menstrual cycle. Computer-assisted mammographic density (Madena) was obtained from digitized mammograms (days 7-12 of the menstrual cycle). Associations between growth factors, estrogen, and mammographic density were studied in regression models. RESULTS:Women with a mean age of 30.7 years had a mean percent mammographic density of 29.8%. Among women in the strata (above median split) of IGF-1 (>25 nmol/l) or GH (>0.80 mlU/l), we observed that an increase in salivary 17β-estradiol was associated with a higher odds for having higher percent mammographic density (>28.5%). The odds ratios (ORs) per standard deviation increase in 17β-estradiol were 1.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-3.03] in the high IGF-1 stratum and 2.08 (95% CI 1.10-3.94) in the high GH stratum. Furthermore, women in these strata of growth factors (above median) who had an overall average 17β-estradiol above median (>16.8 pmol/l) had higher ORs for having higher percent mammographic density (>28.5%): IGF-1 4.13 (95 % CI 1.33-12.83) and GH 4.17 (95 % CI 1.41-12.28). CONCLUSION: Growth factors, in combination with cycling estrogen, were associated with percent mammographic density, and may be of potential clinical relevance.
Authors: Rafael Alvarez; Elika Ridelman; Natalie Rizk; Morgan S White; Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan; Oliver A Varban; Mark A Helvie; Randy J Seeley Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Seungyoun Jung; Frank Z Stanczyk; Brian L Egleston; Linda G Snetselaar; Victor J Stevens; John A Shepherd; Linda Van Horn; Erin S LeBlanc; Kenneth Paris; Catherine Klifa; Joanne F Dorgan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Kimberly A Bertrand; A Heather Eliassen; Susan E Hankinson; Bernard A Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi Journal: Horm Cancer Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 3.869
Authors: F N Fjeldheim; H Frydenberg; V G Flote; A McTiernan; A-S Furberg; P T Ellison; E S Barrett; T Wilsgaard; G Jasienska; G Ursin; E A Wist; I Thune Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Nasreen A Vohra; Swapnil D Kachare; Paul Vos; Bruce F Schroeder; Olga Schuth; Dylan Suttle; Timothy L Fitzgerald; Jan H Wong; Kathryn M Verbanac Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Hanne Frydenberg; Vidar G Flote; Ine M Larsson; Emily S Barrett; Anne-Sofie Furberg; Giske Ursin; Tom Wilsgaard; Peter T Ellison; Anne McTiernan; Anette Hjartåker; Grazyna Jasienska; Inger Thune Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 6.466