| Literature DB >> 24800258 |
Ansuman Panigrahi1, Aditya Prasad Padhy1, Madhulita Panigrahi1.
Abstract
Mental health is a major public health concern worldwide. This study aimed to assess the mental health status and its correlates among married working women residing in Bhubaneswar city of Odisha, India. A cross-sectional study was undertaken in 240 households involving 240 married working women following a multistage cluster random sampling design. Using the predesigned, pretested interview schedule and self-reporting questionnaire, all relevant information was collected. Our study revealed that 32.9% of study respondents had poor mental health and only about 10% of these women had sought any kind of mental health services. Logistic regression analysis showed that 3 predictors such as favourable attitude of colleagues, sharing their own problems with husband, and spending time for yoga/meditation/exercise had significant positive impact on the mental health status of married working women. A preventive program regarding various aspects of mental health for married working women at workplace as well as community level could be a useful strategy in reducing this public health problem.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24800258 PMCID: PMC3988941 DOI: 10.1155/2014/979827
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Mental health status of married working women (N = 216).
| Variables | Number (%) |
|---|---|
| Mental health status | |
| Poor | 71 (32.9) |
| Normal | 145 (67.1) |
| Sought mental health services before | |
| Yes | 07 (9.8) |
| No | 64 (91.2) |
Sociodemographic characteristics and bivariate associations with mental health outcomes among married working women.
| Variables | Mental health status | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor (%) | Normal (%) |
| |
| Age group (in years) | |||
| 20–30 | 26 (38.8) | 41 (61.2) |
|
| 31–40 | 35 (36.5) | 61 (63.5) | |
| 41–50 | 10 (18.9) | 43 (81.1) | |
| Family type | |||
| Joint | 60 (34.3) | 115 (65.7) | 0.837, 1, 0.360 |
| Nuclear | 11 (26.8) | 30 (73.2) | |
| Caste | |||
| General | 36 (31.6) | 78 (68.4) | 0.745, 2, 0.689 |
| OBC | 26 (36.6) | 45 (63.4) | |
| SC/ST | 09 (29.0) | 22 (71.0) | |
| Educational status | |||
| Intermediate | 11 (32.4) | 23 (67.6) | 0.038, 2, 0.981 |
| Graduate | 43 (32.6) | 89 (67.4) | |
| Postgraduate | 17 (34.0) | 33 (66.0) | |
| Occupational status | |||
| Government | 27 (29.0) | 66 (71.0) | 1.092, 2, 0.579 |
| Semigovernment | 06 (35.3) | 11 (64.7) | |
| Private | 38 (35.8) | 68 (64.2) | |
| Addiction of husband to alcohol/drugs | |||
| Yes | 28 (43.1) | 37 (56.9) |
|
| No | 43 (28.5) | 108 (71.5) | |
| Monthly income | |||
| <Rs. 5,000 | 18 (43.9) | 23 (56.1) | 2.840, 2, 0.242 |
| Rs. 5,000–15,000 | 29 (29.6) | 69 (70.4) | |
| >Rs. 15,000 | 24 (31.2) | 53 (68.8) | |
| Parental status | |||
| Had child | 55 (31.2) | 121 (68.8) | 1.131, 1, 0.288 |
| Had no child | 16 (40.0) | 24 (60.0) | |
| History of previous trauma | |||
| Yes | 07 (43.8) | 09 (56.2) | 0.927, 1, 0.336 |
| No | 64 (32.0) | 136 (68.0) | |
| Presence of chronic illness among family members | |||
| Yes | 16 (48.5) | 17 (51.5) |
|
| No | 55 (30.1) | 128 (69.9) | |
Workplace and home situation and bivariate associations with mental health outcome.
| Variables | Mental health status | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor (%) | Normal (%) |
| |
| Reason for working | |||
| Financial constraint | 29 (38.2) | 47 (61.8) | 2.528, 2, 0.283 |
| Personal interest | 32 (32.7) | 66 (67.3) | |
| Husband's will | 10 (23.8) | 32 (76.2) | |
| Started career | |||
| Before marriage | 50 (35.5) | 91 (64.5) | 1.235, 1, 0.266 |
| After marriage | 21 (28.0) | 54 (72.0) | |
| Workplace atmosphere | |||
| Conducive | 40 (26.3) | 112 (73.7) |
|
| Not conducive | 18 (56.2) | 14 (43.8) | |
| Neutral | 13 (40.6) | 19 (59.4) | |
| Attitude of colleagues | |||
| Favourable | 48 (26.5) | 133 (73.5) |
|
| Unfavourable/indifferent | 23 (65.7) | 12 (34.3) | |
| Attitude of husband/in-laws | |||
| Favourable | 54 (29.8) | 127 (70.2) |
|
| Unfavourable/indifferent | 17 (48.6) | 18 (51.4) | |
| Managing household affairs satisfactorily | |||
| Almost always | 09 (25.0) | 27 (75.0) | 3.507, 3, 0.319 |
| Frequently | 20 (35.1) | 37 (64.9) | |
| Occasionally | 28 (30.4) | 64 (69.6) | |
| Rarely/never | 14 (45.2) | 17 (54.8) | |
| Family members expecting same work as nonworking women | |||
| Yes | 30 (31.9) | 64 (68.1) | 0.069, 1, 0.793 |
| No | 41 (33.6) | 81 (66.4) | |
| Misunderstanding/quarrels with husband | |||
| Yes | 10 (41.7) | 14 (58.3) | 0.947, 1, 0.331 |
| No | 61 (31.8) | 131 (68.2) | |
| Sharing own problems with husband | |||
| Yes | 55 (30.1) | 128 (69.9) |
|
| No | 16 (48.5) | 17 (51.5) | |
Family/social issues and bivariate associations with mental health outcomes.
| Variables | Mental health status | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor (%) | Normal (%) |
| |
| Experiencing any conflict | |||
| Yes | 36 (42.9) | 48 (57.1) |
|
| No | 35 (26.5) | 97 (73.5) | |
| Doing justice to both roles | |||
| Yes | 52 (30.4) | 119 (69.6) |
|
| No | 19 (42.2) | 26 (57.8) | |
| Participation in decision making process of family | |||
| Yes | 53 (29.8) | 125 (70.2) |
|
| No | 18 (47.4) | 20 (52.6) | |
| Change in attitude of contemporary men | |||
| Yes | 61 (33.7) | 120 (66.3) | 0.350, 1, 0.554 |
| No | 10 (28.6) | 25 (71.4) | |
| Belief in natural superiority of men | |||
| Yes | 30 (30.0) | 70 (70.0) | 0.695, 1, 0.404 |
| No | 41 (35.3) | 75 (64.7) | |
| Women's employment raising family/social status | |||
| Yes | 63 (32.8) | 129 (67.2) | 0.003, 1, 0.959 |
| No | 08 (33.8) | 16 (66.7) | |
| Time for attending social obligation | |||
| Yes | 34 (26.6) | 94 (73.4) |
|
| No | 37 (42.0) | 51 (58.0) | |
| Attending religious services | |||
| 0-1 time/month | 62 (32.5) | 129 (67.5) | 0.125, 1, 0.723 |
| >1 time/month | 09 (36.0) | 16 (64.0) | |
| Spending time for yoga/meditation/exercise | |||
| Nil | 63 (36.8) | 108 (63.2) |
|
| 1-2 times/week | 06 (23.1) | 20 (76.9) | |
| >2 times/week | 02 (10.5) | 17 (89.5) | |
Results of binary logistic regression predicting the odds of mental health outcomes among women respondents (N = 216).
| Independent variable | Dependent variable |
“ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mental health status (normal = 1, poor = 0) | |||
| ( | Exp ( | ||
| Age group (in years) | 0.203 | ||
| 20–30 | −0.816 | 0.442 | 0.104 |
| 31–40 | −0.765 | 0.466 | 0.101 |
| 41–50R | |||
| Addiction of husband to alcohol/drugs | |||
| Yes | −0.690 | 0.502 | 0.061 |
| NoR | |||
| Chronic illness of family members | |||
| Yes | −0.201 | 0.818 | 0.691 |
| NoR | |||
| Workplace atmosphere | 0.152 | ||
| Conducive | 0.735 | 2.086 | 0.115 |
| Not conducive | −0.054 | 0.948 | 0.933 |
| NeutralR | |||
| Attitude of colleagues | |||
| Favourable | 1.520 | 4.571 |
|
| Unfavourable/indifferentR | |||
| Attitude of husband/in-laws | |||
| Favourable | 0.809 | 2.245 | 0.086 |
| Unfavourable/indifferentR | |||
| Sharing their own problems with husband | |||
| Yes | 1.351 | 3.860 |
|
| NoR | |||
| Experiencing any conflict | |||
| Yes | −0.509 | 0.601 | 0.169 |
| NoR | |||
| Time for social obligation | |||
| Yes | 0.661 | 1.937 | 0.063 |
| NoR | |||
| Spending time for yoga/meditation/exercise |
| ||
| Nil | −1.932 | 0.145 |
|
| 1-2 times/week | 0.867 | 0.420 | 0.365 |
| >2 times/weekR | |||
| Participation in decision making process of family | |||
| Yes | 0.553 | 1.738 | 0.207 |
| NoR | |||
Note: R: reference category; β: regression coefficient (log odds ratio). Exp (β): odds ratio. The model fit statistics were as follows. Omnibus tests of model coefficients: χ 2 value of 62.342 with a “P” value of 0.000 tells that the final model as a whole fits significantly better than an empty model (model with no predictors). Hosmer and Lemeshow test: χ 2 value of 3.062 with a “P” value of 0.930 indicates that there is no significant difference between observed and predicted probabilities and thus the model fits.