Prevalence and correlates of mental distress among working adults in ethiopia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of mental distress and its correlates among working Ethiopian adults.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study of 2,180 individuals (1,316 men and 864 women) was conducted among working adults in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A structured questionnaire was used to collect information on socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics of participants. Mental distress was assessed using the self-reporting questionnaire (SRQ). Logistic regression was employed to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
RESULTS: The prevalence of mental distress in the study sample was 17.7% (25.9% in women and 12.4% in men). Younger participants (age ≤24 years) had the highest prevalence of mental distress (35.5% in women and 16.7% in men). The odds of mental distress was 2.47-fold higher among women as compared with men (OR=2.47, 95% CI 1.97-3.09). Participants reporting excellent health status had a 50% reduced odds of mental distress (OR=0.47; 95%CI: 0.38-0.59); and moderate alcohol consumption was associated with a slight increased odds of mental distress (OR=1.26; 95%CI: 1.00-1.67).
CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of mental distress was observed among working adults in Ethiopia. Our findings suggest that the workforce institutions should provide targeted prevention and intervention programs to improve the mental health state of their employees. National mental health policy that clearly outlines and addresses mental distress among working adults is also warranted.

INTRODUCTION

Globally, mental health problems account for 13% of the total burden of disease, and 31% of all years lived with disability [1]. Mental illness is both a direct cause of mortality and morbidity and a significant risk factor for adverse health outcomes. The social, economic and health impact of mental illness are far-reaching, where they are associated with excess all-cause mortality [2-4], work related disability [2, 4-6]. lower quality of life [7] and cardiovascular diseases risk [8-10]. Studies conducted in sub-Saharan Africa show that 20–30% of primary health clinic attendees present with depressive symptoms and other psychological disorders as the first or secondary reason for seeking medical care [11-13]. Furthermore, mental disorders were also shown to account for 11% of the total burden of diseases in Ethiopia [14].

Mental distress is a collection of mental problems that may not fall into standard diagnostic criteria and are characterized by symptoms of insomnia, fatigue, irritability, forgetfulness, difficulty in concentrating, and somatic complaints [15]. The self-reporting questionnaire (SRQ) is a screening instrument developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) to assess symptoms of mental distress [16]. The instrument has been widely used in community based and health care settings worldwide. Several investigators have used SRQ to evaluate the prevalence of mental distress among adults and adolescents in Ethiopia [17-20]. The first study employing SRQ was conducted by Kortmann [21] in 1988 who reported a 12% prevalence of mental distress disorders among adults in Addis Ababa. Later, other investigators, primarily assessing community- and hospital-based samples in Ethiopia reported prevalence estimates ranging from 11.7% to 23.9% [18-20, 22]. For instance, Kebede et al. reported an 11.7% prevalence of mental distress among residents of Addis Ababa in their 1994 study [18]. The majority of participants in their study (72%) were unemployed. These prevalence estimates are expected to be higher among adults who are working to earn a living and, in doing so, are confronted with various daily stresses [4]. Collectively, available studies showed that low educational attainment, female sex, older age, small family size and family history of mental illness as important risk factors of mental distress [17-20, 22]. While the magnitude of mental distress has been documented in community and hospital based samples, to the best of our knowledge, there are no published reports concerning the prevalence and correlates of mental distress among working Ethiopian adults.

In light of the increasing economic burden among urban dwellers and the scarcity of epidemiologic studies evaluating the magnitude of mental distress among the working force, we conducted this study to estimate the prevalence of mental distress and its correlates among working Ethiopian adults. Results from our study will help in developing evidence based mental health promotion and disease prevention programs that are relevant to working Ethiopians.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects for this study were recruited between December 2009 and January 2010 as part of a larger occupational cohort study of non-communicable diseases in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Details regarding data collection methods and study procedures have been previously described [23, 24]. The primary objective of the parent study was to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors associated with non-communicable diseases among working Ethiopian adults.

Data Collection and Variable Specification

Briefly, study subjects were permanent employees of the Commercial Bank of Ethiopia and teachers in public and government schools of Addis Ababa. A multistage, probabilistic stratified sampling strategy was used to identify and recruit participants. Each participant was interviewed by a trained interviewer in accordance with the WHO STEPwise approach for non-communicable diseases surveillance in developing countries [25]. The approach had three levels: (1) questionnaire to gather demographic and behavioral information, (2) simple physical measurements, and (3) biochemical tests. Some questions were added to supplement the WHO questionnaire reflect on the local context. The modified questionnaire was first written in English and then translated into Amharic by experts and was translated back in to English.

Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20)

To identify mental distress, interviews were performed using the Amharic language version of the SRQ. The SRQ is a 24-item questionnaire developed by the WHO to screen for emotional distress [16]. The original SRQ instrument was designed to screen psychotic (4 items) and non-psychotic (20 items) disorders. Because of the low sensitivity and unreliability of the 4 psychotic items, the 20 items are widely used in epidemiologic studies, hence referred as SRQ-20. The SRQ-20 was translated and validated for use in Ethiopia some two decades ago [21]. The SRQ-20 asks respondents whether, within the 4 weeks before the interview, they had experienced symptoms associated with emotional distress, such as crying, inability to enjoy life, tiredness, and suicidal thoughts. Reliability coefficient Cronbach’s α in our study for the SRQ-20 was 0.81 (0.82 among women and 0.79 among men) showing very good internal consistency of the items. The validation study conducted in Addis Ababa suggested different cut off points for general outpatient clinic attendees and urban communities. We used cut off points previously used among residents of Addis Ababa. Those who answered ‘yes’ to six questions or more on the SRQ-20 were defined as having mental distress [18].

Covariates

Alcohol consumption was classified into low (< 1 alcoholic beverage a week), moderate (1–21 alcoholic beverages a week), and high to excessive consumption (> 21 alcoholic beverages a week) according to the WHO classification [26]. Other variables were categorized as follows: age (years), gender, education (≤ high school, technical school, ≥ bachelors), smoking history (never, current, former), and current khat consumption (an evergreen plant with amphetamine-like effects commonly used as a mild stimulant for social recreation and improve work performance in Ethiopia) [27, 28] (no, yes). Participants were also asked the following question about their self-reported health status: "Would you say your health in general is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?" We compared those who reported fair or poor health with those who reported excellent, very good, or good health (here in after referred as excellent).

All subjects provided informed consent and the research protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Addis Continental Institute of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and the Human Subjects Division at the University of Washington, USA.

Data Analysis

We first examined frequency distributions of socio-demographic and behavioral characteristics of study participants. Prevalence estimates of mental distress across socioeconomic groups were calculated separately for men and women. The distribution of SRQ-20 scores among men and women, as well as the prevalence of each specific symptom were also estimated. We used multivariable logistic regression procedures to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the associations between mental distress and socio-demographic factors. Forward logistic regression modeling procedures combined with the change-in-estimate approach were used to select the final models reported in this research [29]. Variables of a priori interest (e.g., age and gender) were forced into final models. All analyses were performed using STATA 10.0 statistical software for windows (Statacorp, College Station, TX, USA). All reported p-values are two-sided and deemed statistically significant at α=0.05.

RESULTS

A summary of selected socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics of study participants is presented in Table . The majority of participants were between 25 and 34 years of age, unmarried, and to have a college diploma, bachelor’s degree, or higher education. Approximately 12% of men and less than 1% of women reported that they were heavy drinkers. Similarly, approximately 22.0% of men and less than 1.0% of women reported that they were current or former smokers. Khat chewing was reported by 14.0% of men and 0.8% of women. Approximately 37.0% of men and 44.0% of women reported having a fair or poor health status.

Table shows the prevalence of specific SRQ-20 symptoms among men and women. Overall, women had significantly higher prevalence of all mental distress symptoms compared with men. Poor digestion (36.7%) and frequent headache (33.9%) were the most common symptoms reported among women while having uncomfortable feelings in stomach (33.5%) and poor digestion (29.8%) were more common symptoms experienced by men. Having feelings of suicidal ideation was the least common symptom among women (2.6%) and men (1.9%).

Fig. () summarizes the prevalence of mental distress for different SRQ-20 cut points for men and women, respectively. At the cut-off point of 6, we identified 387 cases of mental distress, yielding a prevalence of 17.7% for the total sample. The prevalence of mental distress was 25.9% in women and 12.4% in men. If lower cut-off points were used, the prevalence of mental distress would increase by at least 1.5 times at each lower threshold score.

The prevalence of mental distress across the different age groups by gender is summarized in Fig. (). Younger participants (age ≤24 years) had the highest prevalence of mental distress (35.5% in women and 16.7% in men). Women were more likely to have higher prevalence estimates compared with men across all age groups.

As shown in Table , mental distress decreased with age (p-trend <0.001). The odds of mental distress was 2.47-fold higher among women as compared with men (OR=2.47, 95% CI 1.97-3.09). After adjusting for age and gender former smokers were almost 2-times as likely (OR=1.75; 95%CI: 1.01-3.03) to report mental distress compared with non-smokers. In the multivariate adjusted model participants reporting excellent health status had a 50% reduced odds of mental distress (OR=0.47; 95%CI: 0.38-0.59); and moderate alcohol consumption was associated with a slight increased odds of mental distress (OR=1.26; 95%CI: 1.00-1.67). Similar increased odds of mental distress were observed for heavy alcohol consumption (OR=1.22; 95%CI: 0.69-2.15) although statistical significance was not achieved in part due to relatively limited sample size. Married subjects had 30% reduced odds of mental distress (OR=0.70; 95%CI: 0.50-0.97) as compared with their unmarried counterparts.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study confirm and expand the literature. First, our study findings confirm a high prevalence mental distress (17.7%). Importantly, women were more than twice as likely report mental distress as compared with men (OR=2.47; 95%CI: 1.97-3.09). As expected, women were also more likely to have higher prevalence estimates compared with men across all age groups. Our findings are consistent with prior reports in the literature [17, 18].

Our findings showing high prevalence estimates of mental distress among women compared with men are consistent with most previous studies [17, 18, 30]. Investigators have shown that mental health problems particularly depression, anxiety and somatic complaints affect women to a greater extent than men across diverse societies and social contexts [31, 32]. Pressures created by their multiple roles and responsibilities, gender discrimination and associated factors such as gender based violence; contribute to women's poor mental health [31-33]. Research has shown that women's subordinate social status is reinforced in the workplace as they are more likely to occupy insecure, low status jobs with no decision making authority [31]. In order to combat these pervasive problems, there is a need to develop and implement policies that empower working women. Working women in developing countries are reported to express their stress and depression through symptoms that closely resemble those commonly found among women in developed countries [34, 35]. A study conducted by Carta et al. [34] in rural Malawi utilizing SRQ-20 showed that social circumstances and type of employment among women influenced psychological conditions and their expression. Importantly, competitive working activities played a role in modifying lifestyle of women and hence contributing to more stress and depression expression [34]. In addition, men may have stoic attitude that limits disclosure of psychological symptoms such as crying. Future research is also needed to fully appreciate the impact of mental distress on work productivity and to elucidate how the gender differences in mental distress might influence reproductive and other health outcomes.

Our finding concerning the association between younger age and mental distress is not in agreement with some previous reports [17, 18]. For instance Alem et al. in their study among semi-urban population in Butajira found a positive association between older age and mental distress [17]. The authors speculated that older subjects were more likely to have an accumulation of stressful life events and biological changes as age progresses. Whereas, Kessler et al. in their National Comorbidity Survey in the United States, found old age to be a protective factor for all psychiatric diagnoses [36]. We hypothesize that younger study subjects in our study might have life stressors due to adjustment to the work environment during the first few years and increased economic burden compared with older subjects. This hypothesis is corroborated by a study of medical students of Addis Ababa University which documented a 32.6% prevalence of mental distress [22]. Furthermore investigators noted that high rates of common mental disorders in developing countries are attributed, in part, to living through a period of rapid social changes [37].

Our findings are generally consistent with studies documenting positive associations between alcohol consumption and mental distress [18] although there is no consensus as to whether increased alcohol consumption precedes, or is a consequence of, mental health problems [38, 39]. Nevertheless, available evidence suggest that small reductions in alcohol consumption improves mental health [40]. In this study, we found that married participants were 30% less likely to have mental distress compared with their unmarried counterparts. This finding is not in agreement with a previous study that reported increased mental distress among married participants (OR=1.66; 95%CI: 1.39-2.00) compared with unmarried participants in rural and semi urban community based settings in Ethiopia [17]. However, Kessler et al reported marital disruption was associated with increased mental disorder [36]. We do not have a clear explanation for this. It may be that those who are married are more likely to have settled and share the burden of increasing living cost and more positive health behaviors that may contribute to reduced mental distress [41].

Some important limitations must be considered when interpreting the results of our study. First, the cross-sectional study design precludes delineation of the temporal relation between correlates and mental distress. Second, mental distress is based on self-report and thus, is subject to non-systematic errors in recall and systematic nondisclosure. Both types of errors may have led to some misclassification in our study. Finally, study findings may not be generalized to the broader Ethiopian population since our study was limited to largely well-educated, urban dwelling, employed professionals in banking and academic sectors.

Despite differences in study subject characteristics and different cut-off points used to define mental distress, our study findings are in general agreement with previous reports that documented higher prevalence estimates in Ethiopia [17, 18]. To the best of our knowledge; this is the first reported study among working Ethiopian adults.

Although any employment has been suggested to be protective against mental distress [42], results from this study indicate high prevalence of mental distress among working adults. Our study is an important contribution to research focused on guiding the prevention of mental distress among working adults in Ethiopia. Our findings suggest that the workforce institutions should provide a broad range of targeted prevention and intervention programs to improve the mental health state of their employees. The impact of mental health on productivity and its co-morbidity with other chronic and infectious diseases make mental health promotion in low-income countries a necessity—far from luxury as it is often portrayed [37, 43]. In Ethiopia, significant strides have been made over the past two decades by a handful of visionary and courageous psychiatric epidemiologists in bringing mental illness issues in to light [44, 45]. Their work, in part, has brought important changes in expanding mental health service and training in the country. Despite these laudable changes over the past few years, much remains to be done to put mental health high in the national public health policy agenda and priority. The economic and social impacts of mental health problems are detrimental at individual, societal, institutional and national level. Policy makers at all level should engage mental health experts in current and future health systems strengthening efforts.

Table 1.

Socio-Demogrpahic Characteristics of the Study Population

Characteristics	All N=2,180	Women N=864	Men N=1,316
Age (years)	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)
≤24	451 (20.7)	200 (23.2)	251 (19.1)
25-34	765 (35.1)	272 (31.5)	493 (37.5)
35-44	359 (16.5)	149 (17.2)	210 (15.9)
45-54	415 (19.0)	186 (21.5)	229 (17.4)
≥55	190 (8.7)	57 (6.6)	133 (10.1)
Education
≤ High school	637 (29.2)	355 (41.1)	282 (21.4)
≥ College education	1,543 (70.8)	509 (58.9)	1,034 (78.6)
Marital status
Single	1,110 (51.1)	354 (41.1)	756 (57.7)
Married	924 (42.5)	421 (48.8)	503 (38.4)
Other	139 (6.4)	87 (10.1)	52 (3.9)
Smoking status
Non smoker	1,886 (86.5)	857 (99.2)	1,029 (78.2)
Current smoker	195 (8.9)	6 (0.7)	189 (14.4)
Former smoker	99 (4.6)	1 (0.1)	98 (7.4)
Alcohol consumption
Non drinker	494 (22.7)	267 (30.9)	227 (17.2)
Moderate	1,528 (70.1)	594 (68.7)	934 (71.0)
Heavy	158 (7.2)	3 (0.4)	155 (11.8)
Khat chewing
No	1,987 (91.2)	856 (99.2)	1,131 (86.0)
Yes	191 (8.8)	7 (0.8)	184 (14.0)
Family size
1-2	896 (41.1)	275 (31.8)	621 (47.2)
3-5	1,017 (46.76)	468 (54.2)	549 (41.7)
≥6	267 (12.3)	121 (14.0)	146 (11.1)
Self-reported health status
Poor/Fair	873 (40.1)	382 (44.2)	491 (37.3)
Excellent	1,307 (59.9)	482 (55.8)	825 (62.7)

Table 2.

Distribution of Positive Answers on each of SRQ-20 Items

SRQ-20 Item	Women N=864	Men N=1,316	P-Value
Frequent headaches	292 (33.9)	232 (17.8)	<0.001
Poor appetite	198 (23.1)	231 (17.7)	0.002
Sleeping badly	180 (20.9)	231 (17.7)	0.06
Easily startled	261 (30.3)	143 (10.9)	<0.001
Hands shake	81 (9.4)	110 (8.4)	0.421
Nervous, tense or worried	220 (25.6)	204 (15.6)	<0.001
Poor digestion	315 (36.7)	389 (29.8)	0.001
Having trouble thinking clearly	94 (10.9)	111 (8.5)	0.058
Feeling sadness	204 (23.8)	218 (16.7)	<0.001
Crying in unusual way	101 (11.8)	41 (3.1)	<0.001
Daily work suffering	133 (15.5)	192 (14.7)	0.616
Difficulty in reaching decision	244 (28.4)	289 (22.2)	0.001
Problem in engaging in day to day activities	75 (8.7)	90 (6.9)	0.120
Unable to play useful part in life	97 (11.3)	122 (9.4)	0.146
Lost interest in things	109 (12.7)	108 (8.3)	0.001
Feeling worthless	41 (4.8)	37 (2.8)	0.017
Having suicidal ideation	22 (2.6)	25(1.9)	0.316
Feeling tired all the time	146 (16.9)	144 (11.0)	<0.001
Uncomfortable feelings in stomach	255 (29.6)	436 (33.5)	0.063
Easily tired	196 (22.8)	185 (14.2)	<0.001

Table 3.

Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for Mental Distress

Characteristic	Unadjusted OR (95%CI)	Age and Gender Adjusted OR (95%CI)	Multivariate *Adjusted OR (95%CI)
Age (years)
≤24	Reference
25-34	0.69 (0.53-0.92)
35-44	0.46 (0.31-0.67)
45-54	0.45 (0.31-0.64)
≥55	0.49 (0.31-0.78)
Gender
Men	Reference
Women	2.47 (1.97-3.09)
Education
≤ High school	Reference	Reference
≥ College education	0.69 (0.55-0.88)	0.88 (0.69-1.13)
Smoking status
Non smoker	Reference	Reference
Current smoker	0.44 (0.27-0.73)	0.88 (0.52-1.49)
Former smoker	0.97 (0.57-1.64)	1.75 (1.01-3.03)
Khat chewing
No	Reference	Reference
Yes	0.74 (0.49-1.13)	1.11 (0.71-1.73)
Family size
1-2	Reference	Reference
3-5	1.15 (0.91-1.46)	1.08 (0.84-1.39)
≥6	1.40 (1.00-1.98)	1.31 (0.91-1.87)
Marital status
Single	Reference	Reference	Reference
Married	0.60 (0.46-0.76)	0.67 (0.48-0.92)	0.70 (0.50-0.97)
Other	1.15 (0.75-1.75)	1.21 (0.73-2.01)	1.29 (0.77-2.19)
Alcohol consumption
Non drinker	Reference	Reference	Reference
Moderate	1.08 (0.83-1.42)	1.32 (1.01-1.74)	1.26 (1.00-1.67)
Heavy	0.74 (0.44-1.23)	1.39 (0.81-2.39)	1.22 (0.69-2.15)
Self-reported health status
Poor/Fair	Reference	Reference	Reference
Excellent	0.47 (0.38-0.59)	0.47 (0.38-0.59)	0.47 (0.37-0.59)

Each odds ratio is adjusted for age, gender, occupation and all other covariates listed in the table using forward logistic regression