Literature DB >> 24799922

Noninvasive assessment of cerebral artery stenoses from anatomic computed tomography angiography.

Xiaolong Qi1, Fangyu Zhou1, Jun Wan2, Lin Zhou3, Wei Xu1, Juan Cheng1, Yu Mao3, Wanrong Ma3, Wenbin Ji1, Changqing Yang1.   

Abstract

Trans-stenotic pressure gradient (TSPG) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) are well-validated hemodynamic indices to assess the ischemic severity of arterial stenoses. However, they have significant restrictions in practice due to invasiveness and high cost. Recently, a noninvasive assessment of FFR from computed tomography (CT) angiography has been well validated in evaluating functional coronary stenoses. We present a case of a 65-year-old woman with cerebral artery stenoses demonstrated by clinical symptoms, transcranial Doppler ultrasound and CT angiography, aiming to transplant the noninvasive functional diagnosis, for the first time, to cerebral artery stenoses and test a computational workflow of noninvasive TSPG and FFR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebral artery stenoses; fractional flow reserve; noninvasive; trans-stenotic pressure gradient

Year:  2014        PMID: 24799922      PMCID: PMC4007292          DOI: 10.5114/pwki.2014.41461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej        ISSN: 1734-9338            Impact factor:   1.426


Introduction

Trans-stenotic pressure gradient (TSPG) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) are two well-validated functional indices to assess the ischemic severity of arterial stenoses [1-3]. They have been demonstrated as a promising tool to identify patients who would likely benefit from revascularization [4-6]. However, TSPG and FFR measurement has significant restrictions in clinical practice due to its invasiveness and high cost. A novel noninvasive assessment of FFR from anatomic computed tomography (CT) angiography has been well validated in evaluating functional coronary stenoses [1-3]. The study aims to transplant the functional diagnosis, for the first time, to cerebral artery stenoses and develop a noninvasive assessment of cerebral TSPG (TSPGni) and FFR (FFRni).

Case report

A 65-year-old woman who had symptoms of cerebral ischemia was recruited and gave written informed consent. Approval was obtained from the ethical committees of Tongji Hospital, Tongji University. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound and CT angiography were performed according to a recognized protocol by two technicians who had at least 5 years’ vascular examination experience. For the TSPGni and FFRni interpretation, all CT images were imported into Medical Imaging Control Software MIMICS10.0 where the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) was reconstructed. Three dimensional virtual arteries were then exported from MIMICS10.0 as a virtual reality modeling file to the developed workflow. The inlets and outlets were defined according to the position from which the physiological data were recorded. The closed surface was “meshed” into approximately 1.2 million internal tetrahedra, in preparation for the computational fluid dynamics analysis. Measured flow data and universal central venous pressure were imported, processed, and applied to the inlet and outlet as boundary conditions, and a definition file was created that fully specified the model for the computational fluid dynamics solver ANSYS13.0. This solved the unsteady momentum Navier-Stokes and continuity equations with finite element analysis. TSPGni and FFRni were then calculated. An optimization process was used to determine the microvascular resistance for the patient and we averaged the resistance to produce a generic value applicable to the whole cohort. This approach demonstrated the most effectively predictive capability of the model with minimal personalized data. Two-dimensional models of the PCA in transverse planes were reconstructed (Figure 1A). 3D geometric models of the PCA were separated (Figure 1B). Finite element computational fluid dynamics of ANSYS11.0 was applied to mesh the models. Thereafter, a well-defined mathematical model was obtained (Figure 1C).
Figure 1

Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis of posterior cerebral artery. A – Two-dimensional model reconstruction of the transverse section through cerebral CT angiography. B – Three-dimensional geometric model was extracted from surrounding tissues. C – Geometric model was meshed with local refined tetrahedral finite element

Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis of posterior cerebral artery. A – Two-dimensional model reconstruction of the transverse section through cerebral CT angiography. B – Three-dimensional geometric model was extracted from surrounding tissues. C – Geometric model was meshed with local refined tetrahedral finite element Cerebral TSPGni and FFRni were successfully computed. The peak systolic velocity (PSV) of the PCA was 117 cm/s (left) and 92 cm/s (right). Computed tomography angiography images suggested that the level of stenoses in the PCA was 60% (left) and 15% (right). According to novel assessment, TSPGni and FFRni of the right side of the PCA were 31.6 mm Hg and 0.43. For the left side, they were 59.2 mm Hg and 0.22 (Figure 2A). The velocity distribution in the coronal plane indicated that the velocity remained equal at the proximal and distal stenoses. However, it increased significantly from 1.5 m/s to 5.0 m/s at the site of stenoses (Figure 2B). In addition, it showed that the rate of blood flow increased obviously and central speed shifted to the narrow (Figure 2C).
Figure 2

Anatomical obstruction of posterior cerebral artery with/without hemodynamic stenoses. A – CT angiography suggested mild stenoses (15%, red arrow) on the right side of the PCA and moderate stenoses (65%, blue arrow) on the left side. Cerebral TSPGni and FFRni of the right PCA were 31.6 mm Hg and 0.43; they were 59.2 mm Hg and 0.22 for the left side. B – The velocity distribution in coronal section was computed. C – There are three transverse sections around the stenoses. The increase and offset of velocity were well simulated

Anatomical obstruction of posterior cerebral artery with/without hemodynamic stenoses. A – CT angiography suggested mild stenoses (15%, red arrow) on the right side of the PCA and moderate stenoses (65%, blue arrow) on the left side. Cerebral TSPGni and FFRni of the right PCA were 31.6 mm Hg and 0.43; they were 59.2 mm Hg and 0.22 for the left side. B – The velocity distribution in coronal section was computed. C – There are three transverse sections around the stenoses. The increase and offset of velocity were well simulated

Discussion

Digital subtraction angiography is still treated as a “gold standard” to evaluate “significant” cerebral artery stenoses. However, drawbacks, such as invasiveness and lack of lesion-specific functional diagnosis, greatly limit its clinical worth [7-9]. A large number of clinical trials have proved the great value of TSPG and FFR, which are well-defined functional indices to evaluate the ischemic significance of artery stenoses [4-6]. Recently, the results of a series of international multicenter clinical trials suggested the highly diagnostic performance of a novel noninvasive FFR assessment from anatomic CT angiography (FFRCT) [1-3]. In the study concerning 159 vessels in 103 patients, the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of FFRCT were 84.3%, 87.9% and 82.2%, respectively. Area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUC) was 0.90 [2]. From the results of another study carried out in 252 stable patients from 17 centers in 5 countries, the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of FFRCT plus CT were 73%, 90% and 54%. FFRCT was associated with improved discrimination (AUC: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.75–0.86; p < 0.001) [1]. Our previous studies have successfully demonstrated a novel method computed from CT angiography to functionally evaluate the severity of vascular disease [3]. The study aims at investigating, for the first time, a noninvasive approach to evaluate functional cerebral artery stenoses by TSPGni and FFRni. The results for the left side of the PCA were 65% stenoses, PSV = 117 cm/s, TSPGni = 59.2 mm Hg, FFRni = 0.22, which suggested functional and anatomic moderate stenoses. For the right side, they were 15% stenoses, PSV = 92 cm/s, TSPGni = 31.6 mm Hg and FFRni = 0.43, respectively. From the results, the diagnostic performance of cerebral TSPGni and FFRni was generally consistent with the diagnosis of transcranial Doppler ultrasound and CT angiography.

Conclusions

This is the first study to introduce a novel noninvasive assessment of cerebral TSPGni and FFRni to evaluate “significant” cerebral artery stenoses and their hemodynamics. It is therefore believed that the novel method might be potentially useful in evaluating the functional severity of cerebral ischemia and making clinical decisions of revascularization. Although the diagnostic performance is limited due to the small sample and lack of in vivo values of TSPG and FFR, the results are encouraging and the model will now be optimized with greater patient numbers and invasive values analysis.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Current management of extracranial carotid occlusive disease.

Authors:  Gina M S Howell; Michel S Makaroun; Rabih A Chaer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Noninvasive assessment of transstenotic pressure gradients in porcine renal artery stenoses by using vastly undersampled phase-contrast MR angiography.

Authors:  Thorsten A Bley; Kevin M Johnson; Christopher J François; Scott B Reeder; Mark L Schiebler; Benjamin R Landgraf; Daniel Consigny; Thomas M Grist; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study.

Authors:  Bon-Kwon Koo; Andrejs Erglis; Joon-Hyung Doh; David V Daniels; Sanda Jegere; Hyo-Soo Kim; Allison Dunning; Tony DeFrance; Alexandra Lansky; Jonathan Leipsic; James K Min
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Assessment of renal artery stenosis severity by pressure gradient measurements.

Authors:  Bernard De Bruyne; Ganesh Manoharan; Nico H J Pijls; Katia Verhamme; Juraj Madaric; Jozef Bartunek; Marc Vanderheyden; Guy R Heyndrickx
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee.

Authors:  Donald Lloyd-Jones; Robert Adams; Mercedes Carnethon; Giovanni De Simone; T Bruce Ferguson; Katherine Flegal; Earl Ford; Karen Furie; Alan Go; Kurt Greenlund; Nancy Haase; Susan Hailpern; Michael Ho; Virginia Howard; Brett Kissela; Steven Kittner; Daniel Lackland; Lynda Lisabeth; Ariane Marelli; Mary McDermott; James Meigs; Dariush Mozaffarian; Graham Nichol; Christopher O'Donnell; Veronique Roger; Wayne Rosamond; Ralph Sacco; Paul Sorlie; Randall Stafford; Julia Steinberger; Thomas Thom; Sylvia Wasserthiel-Smoller; Nathan Wong; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Yuling Hong
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography.

Authors:  James K Min; Jonathon Leipsic; Michael J Pencina; Daniel S Berman; Bon-Kwon Koo; Carlos van Mieghem; Andrejs Erglis; Fay Y Lin; Allison M Dunning; Patricia Apruzzese; Matthew J Budoff; Jason H Cole; Farouc A Jaffer; Martin B Leon; Jennifer Malpeso; G B John Mancini; Seung-Jung Park; Robert S Schwartz; Leslee J Shaw; Laura Mauri
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  A novel noninvasive method for measuring fractional flow reserve through three-dimensional modeling.

Authors:  Xiaolong Qi; Huijie Lv; Fangyu Zhou; Jiangmin Zhao; Jiahong Xu; Li Xiang; Fei Wang; Qing Zhan; Jinfa Jiang; Junjie Xiao
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.318

8.  Invasive and non-invasive fractional flow reserve index in validation of hemodynamic severity of intracoronary lesions.

Authors:  Jarosław Wasilewski; Kryspin Mirota; Michał Hawranek; Lech Poloński
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 1.426

  8 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Physiome approach for the analysis of vascular flow reserve in the heart and brain.

Authors:  Kyung Eun Lee; Ah-Jin Ryu; Eun-Seok Shin; Eun Bo Shim
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.657

2.  Functional assessment of cerebral artery stenosis: A pilot study based on computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Zhengzheng Yan; Yuehua Pu; Wen-Shin Shiu; Jianhuang Wu; Rongliang Chen; Xinyi Leng; Haiqiang Qin; Xin Liu; Baixue Jia; Ligang Song; Yilong Wang; Zhongrong Miao; Yongjun Wang; Liping Liu; Xiao-Chuan Cai
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 3.  Functional Assessment of Intermediate Vascular Disease.

Authors:  Teodora Yaneva-Sirakova; Ivanichka Serbezova; Dobrin Vassilev
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.