Literature DB >> 24799480

Multicenter randomized controlled trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme: EnROL.

Robin H Kennedy1, E Anne Francis2, Rose Wharton2, Jane M Blazeby2, Philip Quirke2, Nicholas P West2, Susan J Dutton2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic resection and a multimodal approach known as an enhanced recovery program (ERP) have been major changes in colorectal perioperative care that have improved clinical outcomes for colorectal cancer resection. EnROL (Enhanced Recovery Open Versus Laparoscopic) is a multicenter randomized controlled trial examining whether the benefits of laparoscopy still exist when open surgery is optimized within an ERP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults with colorectal cancer suitable for elective resection were randomly assigned at a ratio of 1:1 to laparoscopic or open surgery within an ERP, stratified by center, cancer site (colon v rectum), and age group (<66 v 66-75 v >75 years) using minimization. The primary outcome was physical fatigue at 1 month postsurgery. Secondary outcomes included hospital stay, complications, other patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and physical function. Patients and outcome assessors were blinded until 7 days postsurgery or discharge if earlier. Central independent and blinded pathologic assessment of surgical quality was undertaken.
RESULTS: A total of 204 patients (laparoscopy, n=103; open surgery, n=101) were recruited from 12 UK centers from July 2008 to April 2012. One-month physical fatigue scores were similar in both groups (mean: laparoscopy, 12.28; 95% CI, 11.37 to 13.19 v open surgery, 12.05; 95% CI, 11.14 to 12.96; adjusted mean difference, -0.23; 95% CI, -1.52 to 1.07). Median total hospital stay was significantly shorter after laparoscopic surgery (median: laparoscopy, 5; interquartile range [IQR], 4 to 9 v open surgery, 7; IQR, 5 to 11 days; P=.033). There were no differences in other secondary outcomes or in specimen quality after central pathologic review.
CONCLUSION: In patients treated by experienced surgeons within an ERP, physical fatigue and other PROs were similar in both groups, but laparoscopic surgery significantly reduced length of hospital stay.
© 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24799480     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.3694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  69 in total

Review 1.  Factors predicting outcome from enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  David E Messenger; Nathan J Curtis; Adam Jones; Emma L Jones; Neil J Smart; Nader K Francis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Impact of radiofrequency energy on intraoperative outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy for cancer in obese patients.

Authors:  Diletta Cassini; Michelangelo Miccini; Matteo Gregori; Farshad Manoochehri; Gianandrea Baldazzi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-05-04

Review 3.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery within enhanced recovery after surgery programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Cheng-Le Zhuang; Dong-Dong Huang; Fan-Feng Chen; Chong-Jun Zhou; Bei-Shi Zheng; Bi-Cheng Chen; Xian Shen; Zhen Yu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Management of nodal disease from colon cancer in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  Corrado Pedrazzani; Lelde Lauka; Simone Sforza; Andrea Ruzzenente; Filippo Nifosì; GianGaetano Delaini; Alfredo Guglielmi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Enhanced recovery pathway in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery: is there an effect of increasing ages? Results from the perioperative Italian Society Registry.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Luigi Beretta; Nicolò Pecorelli; Marianna Maspero; Umberto Casiraghi; Felice Borghi; Luca Pellegrino; Stefano Bona; Roberta Monzani; Gianluigi Ferrari; Danilo Radrizzani; Riccardo Iuliani; Carlo Bima; Marco Scatizzi; Giancarlo Missana; Marco Azzola Guicciardi; Andrea Muratore; Michele Crespi; Hedayat Bouzari; Andrea Pisani Ceretti; Ferdinando Ficari
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-06-15

Review 6.  Objective assessment of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision performance: a systematic review.

Authors:  N J Curtis; J Davids; J D Foster; N K Francis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus open approach for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; XiangHu Wu; Feng Zhu; Ming Shen; Rui Tian; ChengJian Shi; Xin Wang; GuangQin Xiao; XingJun Guo; Min Wang; RenYi Qin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  ERAS pathway for gastric cancer surgery: adherence, outcomes and prognostic factors for compliance in a Western centre.

Authors:  Pietro Maria Lombardi; Michele Mazzola; Alessandro Giani; Sara Baleri; Marianna Maspero; Paolo De Martini; Monica Gualtierotti; Giovanni Ferrari
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-05-20

9.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs for Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhengyan Li; Qingchuan Zhao; Bin Bai; Gang Ji; Yezhou Liu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Impact of laparoscopy on adherence to an enhanced recovery pathway and readiness for discharge in elective colorectal surgery: Results from the PeriOperative Italian Society registry.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Felice Borghi; Marco Scatizzi; Giancarlo Missana; Marco Azzola Guicciardi; Stefano Bona; Ferdinando Ficari; Marianna Maspero; Nicolò Pecorelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.