| Literature DB >> 24799415 |
Jinying Zhao1, Yun Zhu, Karan Uppal, ViLinh T Tran, Tianwei Yu, Jue Lin, Tet Matsuguchi, Elizabeth Blackburn, Dean Jones, Elisa T Lee, Barbara V Howard2.
Abstract
Short telomere length, a marker of biological aging, has been associated with age-related metabolic disorders. Telomere attrition induces profound metabolic dysfunction in animal models, but no study has examined the metabolome of telomeric aging in human. Here we studied 423 apparently healthy American Indians participating in the Strong Family Heart Study. Leukocyte telomere length (LTL) was measured by qPCR. Metabolites in fasting plasma were detected by untargeted LC/MS. Associations of LTL with each metabolite and their combined effects were examined using generalized estimating equation adjusting for chronological age and other aging-related factors. Multiple testing was corrected using the q-value method (q<0.05). Of the 1,364 distinct m/z features detected, nineteen metabolites in the classes of glycerophosphoethanolamines, glycerophosphocholines, glycerolipids, bile acids, isoprenoids, fatty amides, or L-carnitine ester were significantly associated with LTL, independent of chronological age and other aging-related factors. Participants with longer (top tertile) and shorter (bottom tertile) LTL were clearly separated into distinct groups using a multi-marker score comprising of all these metabolites, suggesting that these newly detected metabolites could be novel metabolic markers of biological aging. This is the first study to interrogate the human metabolome of telomeric aging. Our results provide initial evidence for a metabolic control of LTL and may reveal previously undescribed new roles of various lipids in the aging process.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24799415 PMCID: PMC4012935 DOI: 10.18632/aging.100644
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Characteristics of the SHFS study participants according to LTL tertiles (n=423)
| T/S ratio | Tertile 1 (n=139 ) | Tertile 2 (n=144 ) | Tertile 3 (n=140 ) | P trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 0.7549±0.1281 | 0.9960±0.0511 | 1.2584±0.1783 | |
| Median | 0.7865 | 0.9988 | 1.2121 | |
| Interquartile range | 0.6684-0.8565 | 0.9521-1.0411 | 1.1339-1.3171 | |
| Age (years) | 39.50±14.33 | 33.87±12.24 | 28.37±11.16 | <0.0001 |
| Female (%) | 65.47 | 68.06 | 61.43 | 0.4787 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 34.08±7.72 | 32.56±8.36 | 32.01±9.08 | 0.0488 |
| WC (cm) | 107.46±17.83 | 103.58±19.12 | 101.44±20.08 | 0.0081 |
| Current smoker (%) | 30.93 | 40.97 | 35.71 | 0.1891 |
| Current drinker (%) | 68.35 | 65.97 | 67.14 | 0.5926 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 119.65±13.67 | 120.18±13.93 | 118.46±13.92 | 0.4777 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 76.06±9.40 | 76.47±11.15 | 75.75±12.19 | 0.8109 |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 51.19±14.32 | 50.74±15.36 | 50.46±14.57 | 0.6785 |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 101.41±30.90 | 98.12±28.13 | 93.37±27.48 | 0.0210 |
| Total triglyceride (mg/dL) | 143.67±74.09 | 149.11±92.95 | 136.51±68.94 | 0.4131 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 180.69±35.55 | 178.18±33.31 | 170.77±32.14 | 0.0146 |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dL) | 91.62±7.15 | 90.69±7.56 | 90.72±6.93 | 0.2702 |
| Fasting insulin (uU/mL) | 15.82±9.95 | 15.93±12.43 | 16.89±14.47 | 0.4734 |
| HOMA-IR | 3.64±2.46 | 3.63±2.93 | 3.78±3.18 | 0.6999 |
| eGFR | 101.44±25.17 | 103.72±22.94 | 110.39±22.31 | 0.0037 |
| Dietary protein (g/d) | 93.01±80.35 | 93.54±78.54 | 98.44±85.36 | 0.5130 |
| Dietary fat (g/d) | 123.71±97.54 | 120.09±92.38 | 127.28±103.00 | 0.7297 |
| Caloric intake (Kcal/d) | 2778.99±2046.01 | 2729.79±2052.15 | 2942.66±2154.84 | 0.4704 |
P values were estimated by GEE to account for family relatedness
Association of the detected metabolites (q-value <0.05) with leukocyte telomere length by multivariate GEE*
| Matching metabolites | Class | m/z | Retention time | Effect size (95% CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PE(O-18:0/13:0) | Glycerophosphoethanolamine | 686.501 | 439.45 | 0.48 ( 0.25, 0.71) | 9.26×10−5 |
| PE(P-16:0/12:0) | Glycerophosphoethanolamine | 642.452 | 435.46 | 0.51 ( 0.25, 0.77) | 4.92×10−4 |
| PC(O-8:0/O-8:0) | Glycerophosphocholine | 504.340 | 19.88 | 0.63 ( 0.39, 0.88) | 2.17×10−4 |
| Norchenodeoxycholic acid | Bile acids and derivatives | 401.263 | 297.93 | 0.41 ( 0.18, 0.63) | 2.71×10−4 |
| 5β-Chol-2-en-24-oic Acid | Bile acids and derivatives | 359.295 | 404.96 | 0.83 ( 0.49, 1.16) | 1.87×10−4 |
| 3α,6β,7α,12β-Tetrahydroxy-5β-cholan-24-oic Acid | Bile acids and derivatives | 425.288 | 28.14 | 0.58 ( 0.30, 0.85) | 3.10×10−4 |
| 5β-Cholestane-3α,7α,24-triol | Bile acids and derivatives | 421.365 | 508.16 | 0.65 ( 0.35, 0.94) | 3.23×10−4 |
| p-Cresol sulfate (PCS) | Toluenes | 173.029 | 20.11 | 0.56 ( 0.30, 0.82) | 1.45×10−4 |
| Dimethylallyl pyrophosphate | Isoprenoid | 247.011 | 42.92 | 0.61 ( 0.31, 0.92) | 2.48×10−4 |
| Leu-Ala-Val-Ala (LAVA) | Tetrapeptide | 373.243 | 320.09 | 0.28 ( 0.08, 0.48) | 3.19×10−4 |
| N-arachidonoyl histidine | Fatty amides | 442.309 | 345.69 | 0.68 ( 0.37, 0.98) | 1.57×10−4 |
| N-palmitoyl phenylalanine | Fatty amides | 404.318 | 518.86 | 0.72 ( 0.40, 1.05) | 2.32×10−4 |
| Hexadecanedioic acid mono-L-carnitine ester | Fatty Acid Esters | 430.314 | 575.80 | 0.64 ( 0.34, 0.95) | 3.47×10−4 |
| 0.79 ( 0.45, 1.13) | 6.54x10−5 | ||||
| MG(20:3) | Glycerolipid | 403.279 | 472.83 | −0.49 (−0.79,−0.19) | 2.87×10−4 |
| DG(18:2/14:1) | Glycerolipid | 585.443 | 556.01 | −0.33 (−0.54,−0.11) | 1.63×10−4 |
| PG(20:4) | Glycerophosphoglycerol | 533.289 | 401.75 | −0.62 (−0.90,−0.35) | 3.58×10−4 |
| (11Z)-8,18-ethanoretinal | Isoprenoid | 333.221 | 275.34 | −0.71 (−1.03,−0.39) | 1.54×10−4 |
| 5,6-epoxy-3-hydroxy-5,6-dihydro-12'-apo-β-caroten-12'-al | Isoprenoid | 405.243 | 21.45 | −0.80(−1.15, −0.45) | 3.32×10−4 |
| Corticosterone | Steroid | 347.220 | 77.58 | −0.54 (−0.76,−0.31) | 1.83×10−4 |
| −0.94 (−1.33,−0.54) | 9.57x10−5 |
Adjusted for age, sex, study center, waist circumference, LDL-c, total cholesterol and eGFR;
Percent change in LTL (T/S ratio) per 10% change in relative abundance of metabolites
Figure 1Manhattan plot (−log10 p vs metabolic feature) showing metabolites using raw p values obtained from multivariate GEE regression. Metabolites significantly associated with LTL are highlighted in red dots at the q-value level of 0.05.
Figure 2sPLS-DA plot. Participants whose LTL in the top tertile of LTL distribution and those in the bottom tertile are classified into two distinct groups using the multi-marker score comprising of all 19 metabolites significantly associated with LTL in the multivariate GEE model.