J Vincent Filoteo1, Erick J Paul2, F Gregory Ashby3, Guido K W Frank4, Sebastien Helie5, Roxanne Rockwell6, Amanda Bischoff-Grethe6, Christina Wierenga6, Walter H Kaye6. 1. Psychology and Research Service, Veterans Administration San Diego Healthcare System. 2. Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 3. Department of Psychology, University of California Santa Barbara. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. 5. Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University. 6. Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine set shifting in a group of women previously diagnosed with anorexia nervosa who are now weight-restored (AN-WR) and then apply a biologically based computational model (Competition between Verbal and Implicit Systems [COVIS]) to simulate the pattern of category learning and set shifting performances observed. METHOD: Nineteen AN-WR women and 35 control women (CW) were administered an explicit category learning task that required rule acquisition and then a set shift following a rule change. COVIS was first fit to the behavioral results of the controls and then parameters of the model theoretically relevant to AN were altered to mimic the behavioral results. RESULTS: Relative to CW, the AN-WR group displayed steeper learning curves (i.e., hyper learning) before the rule shift, but greater difficulty in learning the new categories after the rule shift (i.e., a deficit in set shifting). Hyper learning and set shifting deficits in the AN-WR group were not associated and differentially correlated with clinical measures. Hyper learning in the AN-WR group was simulated by increasing the model parameter that represents sensitivity to negative feedback (δ parameter), whereas the deficit in set shifting was simulated by altering the parameters that represent changes in rule selection and flexibility (λ and γ parameters, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These simulations suggest that multiple factors can impact category learning and set shifting in AN-WR individuals (e.g., alterations in sensitivity to negative feedback, rule selection deficits, and inflexibility) and provide an important starting point to further investigate this pervasive deficit in adult AN. (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: To examine set shifting in a group of women previously diagnosed with anorexia nervosa who are now weight-restored (AN-WR) and then apply a biologically based computational model (Competition between Verbal and Implicit Systems [COVIS]) to simulate the pattern of category learning and set shifting performances observed. METHOD: Nineteen AN-WR women and 35 control women (CW) were administered an explicit category learning task that required rule acquisition and then a set shift following a rule change. COVIS was first fit to the behavioral results of the controls and then parameters of the model theoretically relevant to AN were altered to mimic the behavioral results. RESULTS: Relative to CW, the AN-WR group displayed steeper learning curves (i.e., hyper learning) before the rule shift, but greater difficulty in learning the new categories after the rule shift (i.e., a deficit in set shifting). Hyper learning and set shifting deficits in the AN-WR group were not associated and differentially correlated with clinical measures. Hyper learning in the AN-WR group was simulated by increasing the model parameter that represents sensitivity to negative feedback (δ parameter), whereas the deficit in set shifting was simulated by altering the parameters that represent changes in rule selection and flexibility (λ and γ parameters, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These simulations suggest that multiple factors can impact category learning and set shifting in AN-WR individuals (e.g., alterations in sensitivity to negative feedback, rule selection deficits, and inflexibility) and provide an important starting point to further investigate this pervasive deficit in adult AN. (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.
Authors: Rhonda M Merwin; C Alix Timko; Ashley A Moskovich; Krista Konrad Ingle; Cynthia M Bulik; Nancy L Zucker Journal: Eat Disord Date: 2011 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Leah M Jappe; Guido K W Frank; Megan E Shott; Michael D H Rollin; Tamara Pryor; Jennifer O Hagman; Tony T Yang; Elizabeth Davis Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Anne-Katharina Fladung; Georg Grön; Karl Grammer; Bärbel Herrnberger; Edgar Schilly; Sabine Grasteit; Robert Christian Wolf; Henrik Walter; Jörn von Wietersheim Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Kate Tchanturia; Amy Harrison; Helen Davies; Marion Roberts; Anna Oldershaw; Michiko Nakazato; Daniel Stahl; Robin Morris; Ulrike Schmidt; Janet Treasure Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christina E Wierenga; Erin Reilly; Amanda Bischoff-Grethe; Walter H Kaye; Gregory G Brown Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2021-11-29 Impact factor: 3.114
Authors: Christina E Wierenga; Amanda Bischoff-Grethe; Grace Rasmusson; Ursula F Bailer; Laura A Berner; Thomas T Liu; Walter H Kaye Journal: Front Nutr Date: 2017-07-19