Literature DB >> 24799280

Perioperative management for pancreatoduodenectomy following severe acute pancreatitis in patients with periampullary cancer: our experience with six consecutive cases.

Sadaki Asari1, Ippei Matsumoto, Tetsuo Ajiki, Makoto Shinzeki, Tadahiro Goto, Takumi Fukumoto, Yonson Ku.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We rarely have an opportunity to perform pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) following the onset of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) for patients with periampullary cancer. The perioperative risks and optimal timing of subsequent PD have, therefore, remained unclear.
METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2012, we performed PD in six patients with SAP. We reviewed these six cases, and compared the perioperative risks of morbidity and mortality with those of 81 concurrent PD patients matched for primary cancer without preoperative SAP.
RESULTS: The six patients were classified as having SAP based on the Japanese criteria developed in 2008. The SAP in five patients was caused by ERCP procedures. The median interval from SAP onset to the operation was 111 days. The rate of Grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula formation in the SAP patients was significantly higher than that of the 81 control patients (83 vs. 26 %, P < 0.001). In addition, the median postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the six SAP patients relative to that of the control patients (40 vs. 30 days, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: An interval of at least 3 months after surgery may be needed to decrease the inflammation of the peripancreas region after SAP. Therefore, unnecessary and low-yield ERCP procedures should be avoided in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24799280     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-0900-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  23 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions.

Authors:  Willy Arung; Michel Meurisse; Olivier Detry
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  The Prevention, recognition and treatment of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Authors:  Nison Badalov; Scott Tenner; John Baillie
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2009-03-09

3.  Nutritional risk index as an independent predictive factor for the development of surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hiroji Shinkawa; Shigekazu Takemura; Takahiro Uenishi; Masayuki Sakae; Kazunori Ohata; Yorihisa Urata; Kazuhisa Kaneda; Akinori Nozawa; Shoji Kubo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy: prospective multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Patrick Pessaux; Alain Sauvanet; Christophe Mariette; François Paye; Fabrice Muscari; Antonio Sa Cunha; Bernard Sastre; Jean-Pierre Arnaud
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Prophylactic pancreatic stent placement and post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T Mazaki; H Masuda; T Takayama
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula.

Authors:  John W Lin; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Taylor S Riall; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Evaluation of a new bipolar coagulation forceps in a thermal damage assessment.

Authors:  Ebonia W Elliott-Lewis; Alexander M Mason; Daniel L Barrow
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis.

Authors:  E J Balthazar; D L Robinson; A J Megibow; J H Ranson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas.

Authors:  Niels A van der Gaag; Erik A J Rauws; Casper H J van Eijck; Marco J Bruno; Erwin van der Harst; Frank J G M Kubben; Josephus J G M Gerritsen; Jan Willem Greve; Michael F Gerhards; Ignace H J T de Hingh; Jean H Klinkenbijl; Chung Y Nio; Steve M M de Castro; Olivier R C Busch; Thomas M van Gulik; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT.

Authors:  E J Balthazar; J H Ranson; D P Naidich; A J Megibow; R Caccavale; M M Cooper
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

1.  Clinical impact of preoperative acute pancreatitis in patients who undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors.

Authors:  Yong-Hua Chen; Si-Ming Xie; Hao Zhang; Chun-Lu Tan; Neng-Wen Ke; Gang Mai; Xu-Bao Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Preoperative independent prognostic factors in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following curative resection: the neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios.

Authors:  Sadaki Asari; Ippei Matsumoto; Hirochika Toyama; Makoto Shinzeki; Tadahiro Goto; Jun Ishida; Tetsuo Ajiki; Takumi Fukumoto; Yonson Ku
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Recurrence and survival after surgery for pancreatic cancer with or without acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Qian Feng; Cheng Li; Sheng Zhang; Chun-Lu Tan; Gang Mai; Xu-Bao Liu; Yong-Hua Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Does Preoperative Acute Pancreatitis Inevitably Delay Pancreatoduodenectomy in Patients with Periampullary Tumors?

Authors:  So Jeong Yoon; Okjoo Lee; Ji Hye Jung; Sang Hyun Shin; Jin Seok Heo; In Woong Han
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.