Eladio Rodriguez-Diaz1, Christopher Atkinson, Lisa I Jepeal, Adam Berg, Christopher S Huang, Sandra R Cerda, Michael J OʼBrien, Irving J Bigio, Francis A Farraye, Satish K Singh. 1. *Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; †Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; ‡Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; §Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts; and ‖Gastroenterology Unit, Medical Service, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 10% to 15% of individuals, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is difficult to classify as ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD). Previous work has demonstrated that probe-based elastic scattering spectroscopy (ESS) can produce spectra, informed by parameters like tissue ultrastructure and hemoglobin content, capable of differentiating pathologies. This study investigates whether ESS is an in vivo optical biomarker for the presence, activity, and type of IBD in the colon. METHODS: Pilot study, a retrospective data analysis. ESS spectra of endoscopically normal and inflamed colon were obtained from 48 patients with IBD and 46 non-IBD controls. Measurements from patients with IBD were categorized as CD or UC based on clinical diagnosis. Spectra were analyzed using high-dimensional methods. Leave-one-patient-out cross-validation was used to obtain diagnostic performance estimates. RESULTS: Patients with IBD were distinguishable from non-IBD controls with a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.91 based on readings from endoscopically normal mucosa, and 0.94 and 0.93 from inflamed mucosa. In patients with IBD, histologically normal and inflamed colon were distinguishable with per-class accuracies of 0.83 and 0.89, respectively; histologically normal from inactive inflammation with accuracies of 0.73 and 0.89, respectively; and inactive from active colitis with accuracies of 0.87 and 0.84, respectively. The diagnosis of CD versus UC was made with per-class accuracies of 0.92 and 0.87 in normal and 0.87 and 0.85 in inflamed mucosa, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ESS, a simple, low-cost clinically friendly optical biopsy modality, has the potential to enhance the endoscopic assessment of IBD and its activity in real time and may help to distinguish CD from UC.
BACKGROUND: In 10% to 15% of individuals, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is difficult to classify as ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD). Previous work has demonstrated that probe-based elastic scattering spectroscopy (ESS) can produce spectra, informed by parameters like tissue ultrastructure and hemoglobin content, capable of differentiating pathologies. This study investigates whether ESS is an in vivo optical biomarker for the presence, activity, and type of IBD in the colon. METHODS: Pilot study, a retrospective data analysis. ESS spectra of endoscopically normal and inflamed colon were obtained from 48 patients with IBD and 46 non-IBD controls. Measurements from patients with IBD were categorized as CD or UC based on clinical diagnosis. Spectra were analyzed using high-dimensional methods. Leave-one-patient-out cross-validation was used to obtain diagnostic performance estimates. RESULTS:Patients with IBD were distinguishable from non-IBD controls with a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.91 based on readings from endoscopically normal mucosa, and 0.94 and 0.93 from inflamed mucosa. In patients with IBD, histologically normal and inflamed colon were distinguishable with per-class accuracies of 0.83 and 0.89, respectively; histologically normal from inactive inflammation with accuracies of 0.73 and 0.89, respectively; and inactive from active colitis with accuracies of 0.87 and 0.84, respectively. The diagnosis of CD versus UC was made with per-class accuracies of 0.92 and 0.87 in normal and 0.87 and 0.85 in inflamed mucosa, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:ESS, a simple, low-cost clinically friendly optical biopsy modality, has the potential to enhance the endoscopic assessment of IBD and its activity in real time and may help to distinguish CD from UC.
Authors: J R Mourant; M Canpolat; C Brocker; O Esponda-Ramos; T M Johnson; A Matanock; K Stetter; J P Freyer Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Cynthia H Seow; Joanne M Stempak; Wei Xu; Hui Lan; Anne M Griffiths; Gordon R Greenberg; A Hillary Steinhart; Nir Dotan; Mark S Silverberg Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-04-21 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Maria Mylonaki; Neil B Rayment; David S Rampton; Barry N Hudspith; Jonathan Brostoff Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Anjan Dhar; Kristie S Johnson; Marco R Novelli; Stephen G Bown; Irving J Bigio; Laurence B Lovat; Stuart L Bloom Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Isaac J Pence; Dawn B Beaulieu; Sara N Horst; Xiaohong Bi; Alan J Herline; David A Schwartz; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2017-01-04 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Ben LaRiviere; N Lynn Ferguson; Katherine S Garman; Deborah A Fisher; Nan M Jokerst Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2019-10-11 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Penny Ford Carleton; Steven Schachter; John A Parrish; John M Collins; J Benjamin Crocker; Ronald F Dixon; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Kent B Lewandrowski; James E Stahl; Catherine Klapperich; Mario Cabodi; Charlotte A Gaydos; Anne M Rompalo; Yukari Manabe; Tza-Huei Wang; Richard Rothman; Chris D Geddes; Lea Widdice; Joany Jackman; Rishi A Mathura; Tiffani Bailey Lash Journal: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 3.316