Literature DB >> 24798632

Routine histological sampling of doughnuts post oncologic anterior resection is not necessary.

Celene Wei-Qi Ng1, Bettina Lieske, Ker-Kan Tan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A stapled end-to-end colo-rectal anastomosis is increasingly adopted following a proctectomy for various colorectal conditions. The ensuing doughnuts of colonic tissue created from the stapling device have been routinely sent for histological analysis. However, its efficacy remains debatable. This study aims to determine if there is a role in sending colonic doughnuts for histological examination following a stapled end-to-end colo-rectal anastomosis following proctectomy for colorectal cancers.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all histological reports of the doughnuts from patients who underwent a proctectomy followed by a stapled end-to-end colo-rectal anastomosis for colorectal cancer in the National University Hospital, Singapore, from 2004-2010 was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 336 patients who underwent a stapled end-to-end anastomosis following proctectomy for colorectal cancer from 2004-2010 had available histological reports. The specimen margins and colonic doughnuts were all negative for malignancy. Clinical decisions were not altered based on doughnut histology results. A total cost of USD$61,017.60 was incurred for the histological processing of these doughnuts.
CONCLUSION: There appears to be no additional oncological or cost benefits in sending doughnuts after a stapled end-to-end colo-rectal anastomosis following proctectomy for colorectal cancers except in selected clinico-pathological conditions whereby the risk of a positive margin is deemed higher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24798632     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-014-1886-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  11 in total

1.  Should 'doughnut' histology be routinely performed following anterior resection for rectal cancer?

Authors:  W J Speake; J F Abercrombie
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Is routine histological reporting of doughnuts justified after anterior resection for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  A M Pullyblank; C Kirwan; H S Rigby; A R Dixon
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Histological examination of circular stapled 'doughnuts': questionable routine practice?

Authors:  A Morgan; P M Dawson; J J Smith
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.392

Review 4.  Techniques for colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  Yik Hong Ho; Mohamed Ahmed Tawfik Ashour
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Stapling instruments for intestinal anastomosis in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  B J Moran
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Stapled vs hand-sutured ileoanal anastomosis in restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  P Luukkonen; H Järvinen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-04

7.  Reappraisal of the 5 centimetre rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum: a study of distal intramural spread and of patients' survival.

Authors:  N S Williams; M F Dixon; D Johnston
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 8.  Consensus statement of definitions for anorectal physiology and rectal cancer: report of the Tripartite Consensus Conference on Definitions for Anorectal Physiology and Rectal Cancer, Washington, D.C., May 1, 1999.

Authors:  A C Lowry; C L Simmang; P Boulos; K C Farmer; P J Finan; N Hyman; M Killingback; D Z Lubowski; R Moore; C Penfold; P Savoca; R Stitz; J J Tjandra
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Is there any justification for the routine examination of bowel resection margins in colorectal adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  S S Cross; A D Bull; J H Smith
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer.

Authors:  I J Adam; M O Mohamdee; I G Martin; N Scott; P J Finan; D Johnston; M F Dixon; P Quirke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-09-10       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  Direct intraoperative assessment of total mesorectal excision specimens by expert pathologists in patients with very low rectal cancer prevents unnecessary abdominoperineal resections.

Authors:  Andreas Rickenbacher; Jennifer Watson; Karoline Horisberger; Antonia Töpfer; Achim Weber; Hermann Kessler; Matthias Turina
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Routine pathologic evaluation of circular stapler anastomotic rings is not useful after resection for colorectal cancer: retrospective study and systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  James R Holden; Pam McIntosh; Garrett G R J Johnson; Jason Park; David J Hochman; Ashley Vergis; Benson Yip; Ramzi M Helewa; Eric Hyun
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-09-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.