Literature DB >> 24798388

Lipid shedding from single oscillating microbubbles.

Ying Luan1, Guillaume Lajoinie2, Erik Gelderblom2, Ilya Skachkov3, Antonius F W van der Steen4, Hendrik J Vos4, Michel Versluis2, Nico De Jong4.   

Abstract

Lipid-coated microbubbles are used clinically as contrast agents for ultrasound imaging and are being developed for a variety of therapeutic applications. The lipid encapsulation and shedding of the lipids by acoustic driving of the microbubble has a crucial role in microbubble stability and in ultrasound-triggered drug delivery; however, little is known about the dynamics of lipid shedding under ultrasound excitation. Here we describe a study that optically characterized the lipid shedding behavior of individual microbubbles on a time scale of nanoseconds to microseconds. A single ultrasound burst of 20 to 1000 cycles, with a frequency of 1 MHz and an acoustic pressure varying from 50 to 425 kPa, was applied. In the first step, high-speed fluorescence imaging was performed at 150,000 frames per second to capture the instantaneous dynamics of lipid shedding. Lipid detachment was observed within the first few cycles of ultrasound. Subsequently, the detached lipids were transported by the surrounding flow field, either parallel to the focal plane (in-plane shedding) or in a trajectory perpendicular to the focal plane (out-of-plane shedding). In the second step, the onset of lipid shedding was studied as a function of the acoustic driving parameters, for example, pressure, number of cycles, bubble size and oscillation amplitude. The latter was recorded with an ultrafast framing camera running at 10 million frames per second. A threshold for lipid shedding under ultrasound excitation was found for a relative bubble oscillation amplitude >30%. Lipid shedding was found to be reproducible, indicating that the shedding event can be controlled.
Copyright © 2014 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Controlled drug delivery; Fluorescence imaging; High-speed imaging; Lipid shedding; Microbubbles; Microstreaming

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24798388     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.02.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  18 in total

Review 1.  In vitro methods to study bubble-cell interactions: Fundamentals and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Guillaume Lajoinie; Ine De Cock; Constantin C Coussios; Ine Lentacker; Séverine Le Gac; Eleanor Stride; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 2.  Ultrasound-responsive droplets for therapy: A review.

Authors:  H Lea-Banks; M A O'Reilly; K Hynynen
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Membrane blebbing as a recovery manoeuvre in site-specific sonoporation mediated by targeted microbubbles.

Authors:  Ruen Shan Leow; Jennifer M F Wan; Alfred C H Yu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Loss of gas from echogenic liposomes exposed to pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  Jason L Raymond; Ying Luan; Tao Peng; Shao-Ling Huang; David D McPherson; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Ultrasonic technologies in imaging and drug delivery.

Authors:  Yi-Ju Ho; Chih-Chung Huang; Ching-Hsiang Fan; Hao-Li Liu; Chih-Kuang Yeh
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Material Properties, Dissolution and Time Evolution of PEGylated Lipid-Shelled Microbubbles: Effects of the Polyethylene Glycol Hydrophilic Chain Configurations.

Authors:  Roozbeh H Azami; Mitra Aliabouzar; Jenna Osborn; Krishna N Kumar; Flemming Forsberg; John R Eisenbrey; Sanku Mallik; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Focal areas of increased lipid concentration on the coating of microbubbles during short tone-burst ultrasound insonification.

Authors:  Klazina Kooiman; Tom van Rooij; Bin Qin; Frits Mastik; Hendrik J Vos; Michel Versluis; Alexander L Klibanov; Nico de Jong; Flordeliza S Villanueva; Xucai Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A new safety index based on intrapulse monitoring of ultra-harmonic cavitation during ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening procedures.

Authors:  A Novell; H A S Kamimura; A Cafarelli; M Gerstenmayer; J Flament; J Valette; P Agou; A Conti; E Selingue; R Aron Badin; P Hantraye; B Larrat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Acoustic trapping of microbubbles in complex environments and controlled payload release.

Authors:  Diego Baresch; Valeria Garbin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Optimal Control of SonoVue Microbubbles to Estimate Hydrostatic Pressure.

Authors:  Amanda Q X Nio; Alessandro Faraci; Kirsten Christensen-Jeffries; Jason L Raymond; Mark J Monaghan; Daniel Fuster; Flemming Forsberg; Robert J Eckersley; Pablo Lamata
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.