Literature DB >> 24798126

Deriving coronary artery calcium scores from CT coronary angiography: a proposed algorithm for evaluating stable chest pain.

Christopher W Pavitt1, Katie Harron, Alistair C Lindsay, Robin Ray, Sayeh Zielke, Daniel Gordon, Michael B Rubens, Simon P Padley, Edward D Nicol.   

Abstract

We validate a method of calcium scoring on CT coronary angiography (CTCA) and propose an algorithm for the assessment of patients with stable chest pain. 503 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and CTCA were included. A 0.1 cm2 region of interest was used to determine the mean contrast density on CTCA images either in the left main stem (LM) or right coronary artery. Axial 3 mm CTCA images were scored for calcium using conventional software with a modified threshold: mean LM contrast density (HU) + 2SD. A conversion factor (CF) for predicting CACS from raw CTCA scores (rCTCAS) was determined using a multivariable regression model adjusted for model over-optimism (1,000 bootstrap samples). Accuracy of this method was determined using weighted kappa for NICE recommended CACS groupings (0, 1-400, >400) and Bland-Altman analysis for absolute score. With the CF applied: CACS = (1.183 × rCTCAS) + (0.002 × rCTCAS × threshold), there was excellent agreement between methods for absolute score (mean difference 5.44 [95% limits of agreement -207.0 to 217.8]). The method discriminated between high (>400) and low risk (<400) calcium scores with a sensitivity and specificity of 85 and 99%, and a PPV and NPV of 92 and 98%, respectively, and led to a significant reduction in radiation exposure (6.9 [5.1-10.2] vs. 5.2 [6.3-8.7] mSv; p < 0.0001). Our proposed method allows a comprehensive assessment of coronary artery pathology through the use of an individualised, semi-automated approach. If incorporated into stable chest pain guidelines the need for further functional testing or invasive angiography could be determined from CTCA alone, supporting a change to the current guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24798126     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0439-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  20 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  A method for coronary artery calcium scoring using contrast-enhanced computed tomography.

Authors:  James M Otton; Jacob T Lønborg; David Boshell; Michael Feneley; Andrew Hayen; Neville Sammel; Ken Sesel; Lourens Bester; Jane McCrohon
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2011-11-20

3.  Comparison of sequential and helical scanning for radiation dose and image quality: results of the Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiation Dose Estimates of Cardiac CT Angiography (PROTECTION) I Study.

Authors:  Bernhard Bischoff; Franziska Hein; Tanja Meyer; Markus Krebs; Martin Hadamitzky; Stefan Martinoff; Albert Schömig; Jörg Hausleiter
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings results from the International Multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery disease.

Authors:  James K Min; Allison Dunning; Fay Y Lin; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Matthew J Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Victor Cheng; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Augustin Delago; Martin Hadamitzky; Joerg Hausleiter; Philipp Kaufmann; Erica Maffei; Gilbert Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Todd Villines; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  The absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive coronary artery disease or the need for revascularization in patients referred for conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  Ilan Gottlieb; Julie M Miller; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Marc Dewey; Melvin E Clouse; Leonardo Sara; Hiroyuki Niinuma; David E Bush; Narinder Paul; Andrea L Vavere; John Texter; Jeffery Brinker; João A C Lima; Carlos E Rochitte
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  A S Agatston; W R Janowitz; F J Hildner; N R Zusmer; M Viamonte; R Detrano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Coronary artery calcium scoring does not add prognostic value to standard 64-section CT angiography protocol in low-risk patients suspected of having coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Sung Woo Kwon; Young Jin Kim; Jaemin Shim; Ji Min Sung; Mi Eun Han; Dong Won Kang; Ji-Ye Kim; Byoung Wook Choi; Hyuk-Jae Chang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Scan length adjustment of CT coronary angiography using the calcium scoring scan: effect on radiation dose.

Authors:  Sebastian Leschka; Chan-Hi Kim; Stephan Baumueller; Paul Stolzmann; Hans Scheffel; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  What is the role of calcium scoring in the age of coronary computed tomographic angiography?

Authors:  Parag H Joshi; Michael J Blaha; Roger S Blumenthal; Ron Blankstein; Khurram Nasir
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Randomized comparison of 64-slice single- and dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Stephan Achenbach; Ulrike Ropers; Axel Kuettner; Katharina Anders; Tobias Pflederer; Sei Komatsu; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Dieter Ropers
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  Coronary Artery Disease Risk Factors, Coronary Artery Calcification and Coronary Bypass Surgery.

Authors:  Fatih Rifat Ulusoy; Mustafa Yolcu; Emrah Ipek; Ali Fuat Korkmaz; Mehmet Yavuz Gurler; Murat Gulbaran
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-05-01

2.  To fly as a pilot after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Thomas Syburra; Ed Nicol; Stuart Mitchell; Denis Bron; Ulrich Rosendahl; John Pepper
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  The HASTE Protocol: a standardised CT Coronary Angiography service operated from a District General Hospital.

Authors:  Iain Thomas Parsons; Clare Bannister; John Badelek; Mark Ingram; Emma Wood; Alex Horton; Michael Hickman; Edward Leatham
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2018-07-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.